Superficial Branch of the Radial Nerve Versus Sural Nerve Grafting After Traumatic Adult Brachial Plexus Injury.

The purpose of this study was to compare two sources of nerve graft for brachial plexus reconstruction: the denervated superficial branch of the radial nerve (SBRN) and the sural nerve. Ninety-seven patients who underwent brachial plexus reconstruction with denervated SBRN nerve (24 patients with 24 grafts) or with sural nerve grafting (73 patients with 83 nerve grafts) were included. The two groups were compared with respect to postoperative muscle reinnervation, disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand (DASH) scores. In the SBRN group, only four (17%) of the nerve grafts provided grade III or higher muscle function. In the sural nerve group, 31 (37%) of the nerve grafts provided grade III or higher muscle function. Smoking had a negative impact on muscle recovery. Denervated SBRN grafts are associated with inferior outcomes when compared with sural nerve grafts in the treatment of traumatic adult brachial plexus injuries. (Journal of Surgical Orthopaedic Advances 33(2):080-083, 2024).

Systematic review of humeral shaft fracture (OTA/AO 12) complicated with iatrogenic radial nerve injury.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the iatrogenic radial nerve injury (iRNI) rate of different implant (plate vs. intramedullary nail) and surgical approaches during humeral shaft fracture surgery. METHODS: The online PubMed database was used to search for articles describing iRNI after humeral fracture with a publication date from Jan 2000 to October 2023. The following types of articles were selected: (1) case series associating with adult humeral shaft fracture, preoperative radial nerve continuity, non-pathological fracture and non-periprosthetic fracture; (2) involving humeral shaft (OTA/AO 12) fractures. Articles where we were unable to judge surgical approach or fracture pattern (OTA/AO 12) were excluded. The data were analyzed by SPSS 27.0 and Chi-square test was performed to identify incidence of iRNI associated with different implant and surgical approaches. RESULTS: Fifty-four articles with 5063 cases were included, with 3510 cases of the plate, 830 cases of intramedullary nail and 723 cases of uncertain internal fixation. The incidences of iRNI with plate and intramedullary nail were 5.95% (209/3510) and 2.77% (23/830) (p < 0.05). And iRNI incidences of different surgical approaches were 3.7% (3/82) for deltopectoral approach, 5.74% (76/1323) for anterolateral approach, 13.54% (26/192) for lateral approach and 6.68% (50/749) for posterior approach. The iRNI rates were 0.00% (0/33) for anteromedial MIPO, 2.67% (10/374) for anterolateral MIPO and 5.40% (2/37) for posterior MIPO (p > 0.05). The iRNI rates were 2.87% (21/732) for anterograde intramedullary nail and 2.04% (2/98) for retrograde intramedullary nail (p > 0.05). In humeral bone nonunion surgery, the rate of iRNI was 15.00% (9/60) for anterolateral approach, 16.7% (2/12) for lateral approach and 18.2% (6/33) for posterior approach (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Intramedullary nailing is the preferred method of internal fixation for humeral shaft fractures that has the lowest rate of iRNI. Compared with anterolateral and posterior approaches, the lateral surgical approach had a higher incidence of iRNI. The rate of iRNI in MIPO was lower than that in open reduction and internal fixation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.

Superficial thrombophlebitis in the forearm leading to entrapment of the radial nerve branch: a first case report and literature review.

This article reports a case of a female patient admitted with swelling and subcutaneous mass in the right forearm, initially suspected to be multiple nerve fibroma. However, through preoperative imaging and surgery, the final diagnosis confirmed superficial thrombophlebitis. This condition resulted in entrapment of the radial nerve branch, leading to noticeable nerve entrapment and radiating pain. The surgery involved the excision of inflammatory tissue and thrombus, ligation of the cephalic vein, and complete release of the radial nerve branch. Postoperative pathology confirmed the presence of Superficial Thrombophlebitis. Through this case, we emphasize the importance of comprehensive utilization of clinical, imaging, and surgical interventions for more accurate diagnosis and treatment. This is the first clinical report of radial nerve branch entrapment due to superficial thrombophlebitis.

In cases of humeral diaphyseal fractures, is lateral approach surgery without radial nerve exploration as effective and safe as conventional surgery?

BACKGROUND: This study compares the efficacy and safety of lateral approach surgery with and without radial nerve dissection in treating humeral diaphyseal fractures. It assesses clinical, radiological, and complication outcomes, providing a description of the surgical methods and perioperative benefits. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed data from 71 patients admitted between May 2015 and December 2022 who underwent lateral approach surgery for humeral diaphyseal fractures. Group 1, consisting of 34 patients without radial nerve dissection, and Group 2, comprising 37 patients with radial nerve dissection, were compared. Parameters such as age, gender, fracture side (right/left), fracture type, follow-up time, surgical duration, blood loss, radiological and clinical evaluations (including Shoulder-Elbow range of motion [ROM] and Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score [Q-DASH]), and complications were examined. Surgical techniques and outcomes were documented. RESULTS: Both groups exhibited comparable distributions in age, gender, fracture types, and follow-up times (p>0.05). Group 1 demonstrated significantly lower surgical duration and blood loss compared to Group 2 (p<0.05 for both). Clinical assessment revealed satisfactory shoulder and elbow ROM within functional limits for all patients, with no instances of infection. Q-DASH scores were similar between groups. Postoperative radial nerve palsy occurred in one patient in Group 1 and three patients in Group 2, with all cases resolving uneventfully during outpatient follow-ups. Radiological assessment confirmed uneventful union in all patients. CONCLUSION: Lateral approach surgery without radial nerve dissection for humeral diaphyseal fractures offers comparable effectiveness and safety to conventional surgery, with potential perioperative advantages such as reduced operation time and blood loss.

Diagnosis and treatment approach of delayed presentation of anterior branch axillary nerve injury following shoulder dislocation: case report.

In this case report, a unique instance of delayed isolated anterior branch axillary nerve injury following shoulder dislocation is highlighted. The patient, a 55-year-old manual laborer, presented with severe deltoid wasting and reduced power 18 months postdislocation, necessitating a specialized treatment approach. The use of axillary nerve neurolysis and an innovative upper trapezius to anterior deltoid transfer via a subacromial path posterior to the clavicle, facilitated by an autologous semitendinosus graft, resulted in significant improvement with 160 degrees of abduction and Grade 4+ power Medical Research Council grading (MRC) at the 5-year follow-up.

Superficial branch of the radial nerve regularly contains fibers from the lateral antebrachial cutaneous nerve: A role in neuroma treatment.

BACKGROUND: Many surgical strategies aim to treat the symptomatic neuroma of the superficial branch of the radial nerve (SBRN). It is still difficult to treat despite many attempts to reveal a reason for surgical treatment failure. The lateral antebrachial cutaneous nerve (LACN) is known to overlap and communicate with SBRN. Our study aims to determine the frequency of spreading of LACN fibers into SBRN branches through a microscopic dissection to predict where and how often LACN fibers may be involved in SBRN neuroma. METHODS: Eighty-seven cadaveric forearms were thoroughly dissected. The path of LACN fibers through the SBRN branching was ascertained using microscopic dissection. Distances between the interstyloid line and entry of LACN fibers into the SBRN and emerging and bifurcation points of the SBRN were measured. RESULTS: The LACN fibers joined the SBRN at a mean distance of 1.7 ± 2.5 cm proximal to the interstyloid line. The SBRN contained fibers from the LACN in 62% of cases. Most commonly, there were LACN fibers within the SBRN's third branch (59%), but they were also observed within the first branch, the second branch, and their common trunk (21%, 9.2%, and 22%, respectively). The lowest rate of the LACN fibers was found within the SBRN trunk (6.9%). CONCLUSION: The SBRN contains LACN fibers in almost 2/3 of the cases, therefore, the denervation of both nerves might be required to treat the neuroma. However, the method must be considered based on the particular clinical situation.

Timing of surgery in peripheral nerve injury of the upper extremity.

Peripheral nerve injuries present a complex clinical challenge, requiring a nuanced approach in surgical management. The consequences of injury vary, with sometimes severe disability, and a risk of lifelong pain for the individual. For late management, the choice of surgical techniques available range from neurolysis and nerve grafting to tendon and nerve transfers. The choice of technique utilized demands an in-depth understanding of the anatomy, patient demographics and the time elapsed since injury for optimized outcomes. This paper focuses on injuries to the radial, median and ulnar nerves, outlining the authors' approach to these injuries.Level of evidence: IV.

Current concepts of surgical approach for radial nerve entrapment around the elbow.

Radial nerve entrapment is an uncommon diagnosis. The entrapment can occur at any location within the course of the nerve distribution, but the most frequent location of entrapment occurs around the elbow and involves the posterior interosseous nerve. Several potential sites of radial nerve entrapment around the elbow are identified: the capsular tissue of the radiocapitellar joint; hypertrophic crossing branches of leash of henry; the leading proximal tendinous and medial edge of extensor carpi radialis brevis; the arcade of Frohse and distal border of the supinator between its two heads. The arcade of Frohse is the most common site of compression. The aim of this manuscript is to describe the common surgical methods to approach the radial nerve entrapments around the elbow and define the preferred surgical approach based on the site of compression.

Clinical efficacy analysis of minimally invasive intramedullary nailing in the treatment of humeral shaft fractures combined with radial nerve injury.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to research the therapeutic effectiveness of radial nerve damage paired with a humeral shaft fracture and intramedullary nailing. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective research was performed on the medical records of 58 individuals who had humeral shaft fractures and radial nerve injuries. The admission period was between June 1, 2020, and June 31, 2022. All study subjects that satisfied the requirements for inclusion were separated, using the random number table approach, into two groups: one for internal fixation (group N), which included 29 cases, and one for minimally invasive procedures (group W), which included 29 patients. Group W received minimally invasive intramedullary nail treatment, and group N received internal fixation with compression plates. The changes in the clinical effects, surgery-related indicators, joint function, nerve function, and levels of stress indicators of the two groups of treatment were analyzed. The changes in adverse reactions and satisfaction of patients were compared. RESULTS: The effective rate of group W was 89.66% (26/29), and that of group N was 72.41% (21/29). Although group W's effective rate was higher than group N's, there was no discernible disparity between the two groups (p>0.05). Surgical blood loss and incision length were much smaller in group W than in group N, and overall operation duration and length of stay were considerably shorter in group W than in group N (p<0.05). The excellent and good rate of elbow joint function in group W was 93.10% (27/29), whereas the excellent and good rate of group N was 65.52% (19/29). The excellent and good rate of elbow joint function in group W was considerably greater than that of group N (p<0.05). In group W, the excellent and good rate of shoulder joint was 96.55% (28/29), and that in group N was 68.97% (20/29), and group W had a considerably greater probability of excellent shoulder joint function than group N (p<0.05); the excellent and good rate of neurological function was 82.76% (24/29) in group W and 58.62% (17/29) in group N, and group W had much greater rates of excellent and good neurological function than group N (p<0.05). prostaglandin E-2 (PGE2), C-reactive protein (CRP) and Substance P (SP) levels in the W group and the N group were substantially higher after the surgery than they were prior to it (p<0.05), and in the W group, the aforementioned stress markers were much lower than they were in the N group (p<0.05). Group W experienced a 3.45% (1/29) rate of adverse events, while group N saw a 24.14% (7/29) incidence. The incidence of adverse responses was substantially lower in group W than in group N (p<0.05). The contentment rate of group W was 93.10% (27/29), and that of group N was 72.41% (21/29). Group W had a much greater contentment percentage than group N (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Minimally invasive intramedullary nailing is a successful therapeutic approach for humeral shaft fractures with radial nerve damage, which may successfully enhance patients' shoulder and elbow joint function and nerve function, reduce patients' stress response, and has the characteristics of minimal adverse responses and high contentment, which is worthy of popularization and deployment.

Anatomical considerations for nerve transfer in axillary nerve injury.

This study investigated the anatomical details of the axillary and radial nerves in 50 upper limbs from 29 adult formalin-embalmed cadavers, and ten fresh upper limbs. The focus was on understanding the course, division, and ramifications of these nerves to improve treatment of shoulder dysfunction caused by axillary nerve damage. The axillary nerve divided anteriorly and posteriorly before passing the quadrangular space in all specimens, with specific distances to the first ramifications. It was found that the deltoid muscle's clavicular and acromial parts were always innervated by the anterior division of the axillary nerve, whereas the spinous part was variably innervated. The longest and thickest branches of the radial nerve to the triceps muscles were identified, with no statistically significant differences in fiber numbers among triceps branches. The study concludes that nerve transfer to the anterior division of the axillary nerve can restore the deltoid muscle in about 86% of shoulders, and the teres minor muscle can be restored by nerve transfer to the posterior division. The medial head branch and long head branch of radial nerve were identified as the best donor options.

Rare Median Nerve and Digital Nerve Tumor Resection and Distal Nerve Transfers: A Report of 2 Cases.

CASES: We present 2 cases of median nerve reconstruction using distal nerve transfers after resection of unusual benign median nerve tumors. Critical sensation was restored in case 1 by transferring the fourth common digital nerve to first web digital nerves. Thumb opposition was regained by transferring the abductor digiti minimi ulnar motor nerve branch to the recurrent median motor nerve branch. Critical sensation was restored in case 2 by transferring the long finger ulnar digital nerve to the index finger radial digital nerve. CONCLUSION: Distal nerve transfers, even with short grafts, are reliable median nerve deficit treatments, sparing the need for larger autologous nerve grafts and late tendon opponensplasties.

Neuropathic pain of the superficial branch of the radial nerve - Factors influencing surgical outcome and patient satisfaction.

BACKGROUND: Due to its partially superficial course, the superficial branch of the radial nerve is vulnerable to injury by trauma or surgery, potentially leading to painful neuroma. Surgical treatment is difficult. Among other factors, smoking and duration of pain before revision surgery have been suggested as risk factors for persistent pain after surgical revision, without concrete evidence. The aim of this study was therefore to identify factors influencing the outcome of revision surgery in SBRN neuropathic pain in our department. METHODS: All 51 patients receiving revision surgery of the superficial branch of the radial nerve for neuropathic pain from 2010 to 2020 were contacted; 19 agreed to return for assessment. A medical chart review was performed to collect patient-, pain- and treatment-specific factors. Outcomes were recorded. In an outpatient consultation, clinical follow-up was performed and patients filled out the DASH, MHQ and painDETECT questionnaires. RESULTS: After revision surgery, all patients experienced persistent pain. On multivariate logistic regression evaluating the risk of persistent pain, only smoking emerged as an independent risk factor. Age, gender, dominant side, location, time between trigger and surgery or diagnosis did not emerge as risk factors. No predictor for successful return to work could be identified. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of painful neuroma of the superficial branch of the radial nerve is a challenge. Patients with neuropathic pain should be coached toward smoking cessation before neuroma surgery. Surgery can show benefit even after long symptom duration. No correlations between study clinical variables or test results and return to work could be identified, suggesting that other factors play a role in return to work.

Rehabilitation Following a Triceps Branch to Axillary Motor Nerve Transfer-A Pragmatic Therapy Guide.

Peripheral motor nerve transfer surgery is a technique that may be used to restore motor function to paralyzed muscles. Motor nerve transfer involves harvesting an expendable motor nerve branch, and transfer to the motor branch of the denervated target muscle, using microsurgical coaptation. To date, a standardized rehabilitation protocol does not exist. The 6 stages of rehabilitation after motor nerve transfer surgery were outlined by colleagues in the Birmingham Peripheral Nerve Injury service in 2019. This article aims to provide a practical therapy perspective on the rehabilitation stages of motor nerve transfer surgery outlined in that paper, focusing on the radial to axillary nerve transfer. Timeframes for each stage along with exercise prescription and rationale are provided.

Anatomy of the Superficial Radial Nerve and Its Target Nerves for Targeted Muscle Reinnervation: An Anatomical Cadaver Study.

BACKGROUND: Targeted muscle reinnervation (TMR) is a surgical procedure for treating symptomatic neuroma, in which the neuroma is removed and the proximal nerve stump is coapted to a donor motor branch innervating a nearby muscle. This study aimed to identify optimal motor targets for TMR of the superficial radial nerve (SRN). METHODS: Seven cadaveric upper limbs were dissected to describe the course of the SRN in the forearm and motor nerve supply-number, length, diameter, and entry points in muscle of motor branches-for potential recipient muscles. RESULTS: The radial nerve provided three (three of six) motor branches, two (two of six) motor branches, or one (one of six) motor branch to the brachioradialis muscle, entering the muscle 21.7 ± 17.9 to 10.8 ± 15 mm proximal to the lateral epicondyle. One (one of seven), two (three of seven), three (two of seven), or four (one of seven) motor branches innervated the extensor carpi radialis longus muscle, with entry points 13.9 ± 16.2 to 26.3 ± 14.9 mm distal from the lateral epicondyle. In all specimens, the posterior interosseous nerve gave off one motor branch to the extensor carpi radialis brevis, which divided into two or three secondary branches. The distal anterior interosseus nerve was assessed as a potential recipient for TMR coaptation and had a freely transferable length of 56.4 ± 12.7 mm. CONCLUSIONS: When considering TMR for neuromas of the SRN in the distal third of the forearm and hand, the distal anterior interosseus nerve is a suitable donor target. For neuromas of the SRN in the proximal two-thirds of the forearm, the motor branches to the extensor carpi radialis longus, extensor carpi radialis brevis, and brachioradialis are potential donor targets.

Comparison of nerve versus tendon transfer for radial nerve palsy.

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to investigate the choice of intervention time and operation mode between nerve and tendon transfer for the treatment of radial nerve palsy (RNP). METHODS: 46 RNP patients underwent nerve transfer (n = 22) and tendon transfer (n = 24). The intraoperative blood loss, main incision length, operation duration, and length of hospital stay and follow-up period of patients in these two groups were recorded and compared. The range of motion (ROM) of the elbow, wrist, fingers, and thumb, the hand grip and pinch strength, the Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) and the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) scores were measured and compared preoperatively and postoperatively between the two groups. RESULTS: The ROM of thumb and the hand grip strength of patients in the nerve transfer group were greater than that in the tendon transfer (P < 0.05). Both of the two groups indicated significant improvements in the ROM of elbow, wrist, finger, thumb and the hand grip and pinch strength (P < 0.05) postoperatively. The DASH scores decreased significantly at 6 months (P < 0.05) and 12 months (P < 0.05) after surgery in both groups, while the postoperative SF-36 scores significantly increased (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in postoperative DASH and SF-36 scores between the two groups (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: In summary, both nerve and tendon transfer techniques are effective treatments for RNP. Nerve transfer is particularly advantageous for early RNP, while tendon transfer is suitable for patients with radial nerve injury more than one year.

A Fresh Cadaver Study on the Innervation of Brachioradialis and Extensor Carpi Radialis Longus Muscles.

PURPOSE: Distal nerve transfers have revolutionized peripheral nerve surgery by allowing the transfer of healthy motor nerves to paralyzed ones without causing additional morbidity. Radial nerve branches to the brachialis (Ba), brachioradialis (Br), and extensor carpi radialis longus (ECRL) muscles have not been investigated in fresh cadavers. METHODS: The radial nerve and its branches were dissected in 34 upper limbs from 17 fresh cadavers. Measurements were taken to determine the number, origin, length, and diameter of the branches. Myelinated fiber counts were obtained through histological analysis. RESULTS: The first branch of the radial nerve at the elbow was to the Ba muscle, followed by the branches to the Br and ECRL muscles. The Ba and Br muscles consistently received single innervation. The ECRL muscle showed varying innervation patterns, with one, two, or three branches. The branches to the Br muscles originated from the anterior side of the radial nerve, whereas the branches to the Ba and ECRL muscles originated from the posterior side. The average myelinated fiber counts favored the nerve to Br muscle over that to the ECRL muscle, with counts of 542 versus 350 and 568 versus 302 observed in hematoxylin and eosin and neurofilament staining, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides detailed anatomical insights into the motor branches of the radial nerve to the Ba, Br, and ECRL muscles. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Understanding the anatomy of the radial nerve branches at the elbow is of utmost importance when devising a reconstructive strategy for upper limb paralysis. These findings can guide surgeons in selecting appropriate donor or recipient nerves for nerve transfer in cases of high tetraplegia and lower-type brachial plexus injuries.

Anterior transposition of the radial nerve to achieve primary suture for its reconstruction: Anatomical feasibility study.

INTRODUCTION: Radial nerve palsy after humeral shaft fractures is often associated with formation of a neuroma in continuity. The current standard of treatment is neuroma resection and nerve grafting with contentious results. Anterior transposition of the radial nerve may reduce the length of its path, allowing reconstruction by primary suture. The aim of this study was to determine the maximum length of radial nerve defect that can be treated by the anterior transposition to allow primary suture to be performed. METHODS: We use 10 arms from five fresh cadavers. The radial nerve was dissected in the lateral inter-muscular septum and along the anterior aspect of the forearm. The radial nerve was transected at the level of the spiral groove and both stumps were than transposed anterior to the medial inter-muscular septum. The length of tension-free overlap that could be achieved was measured. RESULTS: The average length of the overlap at zero degrees of elbow flexion was 10.00 ± 1.84 mm. Theoretically, this will allow a defect of 20 ± 3.69 mm SD to be treated by primary suture. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that anterior transposition can be used for radial nerve defects up to 2 cm; however, dissection of both stumps proved to be challenging.

Advantages of simultaneous radial nerve and tendon reconstruction - a case report.

Transection of the radial nerve is frequently associated with humeral shaft fractures that are part of a very complex upper extremity injury. In the presented case, a 19-year-old man with a 10-cm radial nerve defect with a need for nerve grafting to recover complete sensory and motor deficit of the radial nerve. In our case, at the same time we provided the tendon transfer of musculus (m.) pronator teres to m. extensor carpi radialis brevis, m. flexor carpi ulnaris to m. extensor digitorum communis, m. palmaris longus to m. extensor pollicis longus, and long sural nerve graft because of an extensive zone of the injury. The assumption was that if these two procedures are performed in one surgery, it will accelerate overall recovery, restore the functionality of the upper limb more quickly, and thus enable a faster recovery.

Axillary to Radial Nerve Transfer for Recovery of Elbow Extension After Spinal Cord Injury.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Cervical spinal cord injuries (SCI) result in severe loss of function and independence. Nerve transfers have become a powerful method for restoring upper extremity function, the most critical missing function desired by this patient population. Recovery of active elbow extension allows for expansion of one's workspace to reach for objects and stabilizes control at the elbow joint. Without triceps function, a patient with a cervical SCI is rendered entirely helpless when in the supine position. Our objective was to provide a concise description of the transfer of branches of the axillary nerve (AN) to the long head of the triceps branch of the radial nerve (RN) for restoration of elbow extension after cervical SCI. METHODS: An anterior, axillary approach is used for the transfer of the nerve branches of the AN (which may include branches to the teres minor, posterior deltoid, or even middle deltoid) to the long head of the triceps branch of the RN. Preoperative assessment and intraoperative stimulation are demonstrated to direct optimal selection of axillary branch donors. RESULTS: The axillary approach provides full access to all branches of the AN in optimal proximity to triceps branches of the RN and allows for tension-free coaptation to achieve successful recovery of elbow extension. Final outcomes may not be achieved for 18 months. Of our last 20 patients with greater than 12-month follow-up, 13 have achieved antigravity strength in elbow extension, 4 are demonstrating ongoing progression, and 3 are definitive failures by 18 months. CONCLUSION: The axillary to RN transfer is an important intervention for recovery of elbow extension after cervical SCI, which significantly improves quality of life in this patient population. Further large population outcomes studies are necessary to further establish efficacy and increase awareness of these procedures.

[Secondary surgical procedures following motor nerve injuries]. / Sekundäre operative Verfahren bei Verletzungen motorischer Nerven.

BACKGROUND: The functional deficits that develop after a peripheral nerve injury mean a considerable reduction in the quality of life for the affected patients. However, interventions on the injured nerve are not always possible or effective. In this case, secondary procedures, e.g. tendon transfers, are a feasible option for functional reconstruction. OBJECTIVES: An overview of the most common secondary surgical procedures for functional reconstruction after peripheral nerve injuries. METHODS: Presentation and discussion of the most common secondary surgical procedures with emphasis on tendon transfers. Illustration of the primary functions that need to be reconstructed depending on the respective nerve lesion. RESULTS: The basic principle of secondary surgical procedures after nerve injuries is the transposition of a healthy tendomuscular unit to replace a lost function following a loss of muscle or tendon or if an intervention on the nerve is not promising. For example, by transferring flexor forearm muscles, wrist, finger and thumb extension can be reconstructed after radial nerve injury. By transposing the tibialis posterior muscle, dorsiflexion in the talocrural joint can be restored to enable the affected patient to walk safely without an orthosis. CONCLUSIONS: Secondary surgical procedures are a valuable option for functional reconstruction after nerve injury.