Diuresis renography in equivocal urinary tract obstruction. A historical perspective.

Obstructive nephropathy may be suspected for the incidental detection of dilated renal collecting system at ultrasonography, CT or MRI. A dilated renal collecting dilation (calyco-pelvis or ureteres) might be related 1) to an anatomical variant of the excretory tract without obstruction and, therefore, without consequence on renal function, or 2) to an obstruction/stenosis of the urinary tract that may cause a damage of kidney function. In the present review we annotated the various methods proposed for Diuresis Renography (DR) used with the purpose to make early diagnosis of obstructive nephropathy. First, the F + 20 method (i.e. furosemide 40 mg injected IV 20 min after radiotracer injection) in seated position (sp) (F + 20(sp)) was reported to distinguish between an anatomical dilation from an anatomical obstruction of the urinary tract. It was also suggested to perform DR with the patient in supine or prone position in order to minimize possible furosemide-induced hypotension and patient's movements during exam. Other DR methods were proposed administering furosemide EV to the patient in supine position at different times: F-15 (furosemide injected IV 15 min prior to radiotracer), F0 (furosemide injected contemporary to radiotracer), F + 20 (furosemide injected 20 min after the radiotracer), F-20 and Well Tempered (other than F + 20 this modality requires saline infusion for all duration of the test plus bladder catheterization). Unfortunately, in all the above described DR methods with patientin supine position, despite the furosemide administration, a sensitive slowing down of urinary outflow could be related to the supine position itself of the patient during the examination. Lastly, there are reports of a new DR method based on furosemide IV injection 10 min after radiotracer with the patient in seated position, F+10(sp). This method allows a better timing between hydration (400 mL of water) at 5 min, and the injection of relatively low dose of furosemide (20 mg), thus avoiding side effects as diuretic-induced hypotension and favouring bladder filling, therefore ameliorating patient compliance and reducing equivocal responses.

The Whitaker test.

PURPOSE: The Whitaker test was conceived and developed by Roger H. Whitaker (May 25, 1939) while he was a resident at Cambridge University in the late 1960s and early 1970s. The test combines a urodynamic study with antegrade pyelography to measure the pressure differential between the renal pelvis and the bladder. The test can differentiate between patients with residual or recurrent obstruction and those with dilatation secondary to permanent changes in the musculature. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We present the history of the Whitaker test and its place in modern practice. RESULTS: It is useful in evaluating patients with questionable ureteropelvic or ureterovesical junction obstruction and primary defects in the ureteral musculature. It can also be used to determine when percutaneous nephrostomy tubes can be safely discontinued in postoperative patients. CONCLUSION: The merit of the Whitaker test in comparison to other less invasive tests, specifically diuretic renography, is the subject of much debate. However, such debate erroneously presupposes that the tests are directly comparable, which they are not. The correct use for the Whitaker test is to assesses potential upper tract obstruction in equivocal cases and should only be utilized when equivocal results are obtained by other less invasive tests, obstruction is suspected in a poorly functioning kidney, a negative renogram with colic, intermittent obstruction, and percutaneous access already exists and the cause of dilatation needs investigating.

Exciting times: towards a totally minimally invasive paediatric urology service.

Following on from the first paediatric laparoscopic nephrectomy in 1992, the growth of minimally invasive ablative and reconstructive procedures in paediatric urology has been dramatic. This article reviews the literature related to laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty, optimising posterior urethral valve ablation and intravesical laparoscopic ureteric reimplantation.

Obstrucción del tramo urinario superior. Revisión años 80 / Obstruction of the upper urinary tract. State of the art of the 80´s

El Dr. Solé –Balcells ha tomado apuntes sistemáticamente durante toda su larga carrera como urólogo, convirtiéndolos en lecciones o en documentos de revisión y estudio. Perfectamente ordenadas y muy completas, estas notas raramente han sido publicadas. Recuperamos aquí un manuscrito original redactado en los años 1980 sobre uno de sus temas prediclectos: la uropatía obstructiva. El texto mantiene la vigencia en cuanto a la urodinámica de la obstrucción ureteral y, al mismo tiempo, es un documento histórico que refleja el quehacer urológico hace 25 años. Se trata de un repaso breve e intenso de la fisiopatología ureteral, con apuntes sorprendentes como la “super-sonda” peristáltica de la urografía o la descripción de medios neurofisiológicos de exploración ureteral como la EMG y el manómetro intraluminal

No disponible

[History of ureteropelvic junction obstruction repair (pyeloplasty). From Trendelenburg (1886) to the present]. / Die Geschichte der operativen Behandlung der Harnleiterabgangsstenose (Pyeloplastik). Von Trendelenburg (1886) bis zur Gegenwart.

The first reconstructive procedure for ureteropelvic junction (UPJ) obstruction was performed by Trendelenburg in 1886. The important milestones in the reconstruction of UPJ are discussed and all available historical papers and reports since 1886 are reviewed. Kuster published the first successful dismembered pyeloplasty 5 years later, but his technique was prone to strictures. In 1892, the application of the Heineke-Mickulicz principle by Fenger resulted in bulking and kinking with obstruction. Plication of the renal pelvis, first introduced by Israel in 1896, was modified by Kelly in 1906. After the principle of the Finney pyloroplasty, von Lichtenberg designed his pyeloplasty in 1921, best suited to cases of high implantation of the ureter. Foley modified flap techniques, first introduced by Schwyzer in 1923 after the application of the Durante pyloroplasty principle, successfully to Y-V pyeloplasty in 1937. Culp and de-Weerd introduced the spiral flap in 1951. Scardino and Prince reported about the vertical flap in 1953. Patel published the extra-long spiral flap technique in 1982. In order to decrease the likelihood of stricture, Nesbit, in 1949, modified Kuster's procedure by utilizing an elliptic anastomosis. In the same year, Anderson and Hynes, published their technique. With the advent of endourology, several minimally invasive procedures were applied: antegrade or retrograde endopyelotomy, balloon dilation, and laparoscopic pyeloplasty. The concept of full-thickness incision of the narrow segment followed by prolonged stenting was first described in 1903 by Albarran and was popularized by Davis in 1943. Several basic principles must be applied in order to ensure successful repair: the resultant anastomosis should be widely patent, performed in a watertight fashion without tension. Endopyelotomy represents an alternative to open surgery.