Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Microscopic and Endoscopic Transsphenoidal Surgery Versus Medical Therapy in the Management of Microprolactinoma in the United States.

BACKGROUND: Although prolactinomas are treated effectively with dopamine agonists, some have proposed curative surgical resection for select cases of microprolactinomas to avoid life-long medical therapy. We performed a cost-effectiveness analysis comparing transsphenoidal surgery (either microsurgical or endoscopic) and medical therapy (either bromocriptine or cabergoline) with decision analysis modeling. METHODS: A 2-armed decision tree was created with TreeAge Pro Suite 2012 to compare upfront transsphenoidal surgery versus medical therapy. The economic perspective was that of the health care third-party payer. On the basis of a literature review, we assigned plausible distributions for costs and utilities to each potential outcome, taking into account medical and surgical costs and complications. Base-case analysis, sensitivity analysis, and Monte Carlo simulations were performed to determine the cost-effectiveness of each strategy at 5-year and 10-year time horizons. RESULTS: In the base-case scenario, microscopic transsphenoidal surgery was the most cost-effective option at 5 years from the time of diagnosis; however, by the 10-year time horizon, endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery became the most cost-effective option. At both time horizons, medical therapy (both bromocriptine and cabergoline) were found to be more costly and less effective than transsphenoidal surgery (i.e., the medical arm was dominated by the surgical arm in this model). Two-way sensitivity analysis demonstrated that endoscopic resection would be the most cost-effective strategy if the cure rate from endoscopic surgery was greater than 90% and the complication rate was less than 1%. Monte Carlo simulation was performed for endoscopic surgery versus microscopic surgery at both time horizons. This analysis produced an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $80,235 per quality-adjusted life years at 5 years and $40,737 per quality-adjusted life years at 10 years, implying that with increasing time intervals, endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery is the more cost-effective treatment strategy. CONCLUSIONS: On the basis of the results of our model, transsphenoidal surgical resection of microprolactinomas, either microsurgical or endoscopic, appears to be more cost-effective than life-long medical therapy in young patients with life expectancy greater than 10 years. We caution that surgical resection for microprolactinomas be performed only in select cases by experienced pituitary surgeons at high-volume centers with high biochemical cure rates and low complication rates.

[Cost-effectiveness analysis of two therapeutic methods for prolactinoma].

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the therapeutic responses to transsphenoidal surgery and medical therapy in terms of normalization of prolactin (PRL), mortality, morbidity and the cost-effectiveness of PRL normalization in order to establish an individualized therapeutic protocol for the patients with prolactinoma. METHODS: A retrospective study was undertaken of a consecutive series of patients with prolactinoma who were followed for at least 1 year after transsphenoidal surgery or medical treatment. The clinical characteristics and the long-term outcomes (normalization of PRL, morbidity or mortality) were assessed. Utilizing the principle of medical economics and data from the two types of treatment, we worked out a Markov chain and calculated the lowest cost of two kinds of therapeutic protocols. RESULTS: (1) The success rate of normalizing serum PRL through surgical treatment in microadenoma was 85% (22/26), and that of medical treatment was 95% (19/20). There was no statistical difference between the two therapies (P > 0.05). The success rate of normalizing serum PRL through surgical treatment in macroadenoma was 45% (19/42), and that of medical treatment was 5/5. There was a statistical difference between the two therapies (P < 0.05). (2) According to the Markov model, it would cost a microprolactinoma patient 25,129.25 yuan to normalize serum PRL by surgical treatment. This is comparable to the cost of medical treatment which would be 24,943.99 yuan. Whereas for a macroprolactinoma patient surgery would cost 35,208.20 yuan and medical treatment would cost 25,344.38 yuan. CONCLUSIONS: Medical therapy is superior to surgical treatment in regard to complication rate and cost-effectiveness for macro- and extra big prolactinomas. Transsphenoidal surgery remains an option for patients with microadenomas. Markov model is an effective way to predict the treatment cost for patients with hyperprolactinoma at different ages and with different causes.

Management of incidental pituitary microadenomas: a cost-effectiveness analysis.

The objective of this study was to compare the cost-effectiveness of four management strategies for a patient with an incidentally discovered asymptomatic pituitary microadenoma. A decision analytic Markov model was used to determine the incremental cost-effectiveness of four clinical management strategies: 1) expectant management, 2) PRL screening, 3) an endocrine screening panel (PRL, insulin-like growth factor I, and 1-mg dexamethasone suppression test), and 4) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) follow-up. The model incorporated the natural history of incidental microadenomas, test characteristics, pharmacological and surgical treatment outcomes, patient's quality of life, discounting, and the costs of hormone testing, bromocriptine, MRIs, hospitalization for surgery, and physician services. PRL screening, endocrine screening panel, and MRI follow-up all provided slightly greater quality-adjusted survival than expectant management, but the costs increased disproportionately more than the benefits. The incremental cost per quality-adjusted life year for PRL screening is $1,428, and that for the endocrine screening panel is $69,495. These results are most sensitive to patient anxiety about the microadenoma; increased anxiety shifts the recommended strategy to the endocrine screening panel. We conclude that in patients with an incidental asymptomatic pituitary microadenoma, a single PRL test may be the most cost-effective management strategy.