RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: The impact of pregnancy on the development of pouchitis in women who have undergone total proctocolectomy with ileal pouch anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis is poorly understood. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of women with ulcerative colitis who underwent total proctocolectomy with ileal pouch anal anastomosis and subsequently became pregnant at Mount Sinai Hospital. The primary outcome was acute pouchitis during pregnancy or the postpartum period defined as symptoms of increased stool frequency and urgency treated with antibiotics. RESULTS: A total of 44 women with 63 pregnancies and complete data were identified. Acute pouchitis occurred in 14 pregnancies (22.2%) in 12 women and in the postpartum period of 10 pregnancies (15.9%) in 9 women. Acute pouchitis occurred more frequently in women with a history of acute pouchitis immediately before, during, or after pregnancy. DISCUSSION: Acute pouchitis was common during pregnancy and the postpartum period, likely due to microbial shifts. Although not statistically significant, these results provide insight into the impact of pregnancy on the risk of pouchitis and establish the framework for preconception counseling that focuses on prevention and management of pouchitis during pregnancy.
Asunto(s)
Colitis Ulcerosa , Periodo Posparto , Reservoritis , Complicaciones del Embarazo , Proctocolectomía Restauradora , Humanos , Femenino , Reservoritis/etiología , Reservoritis/epidemiología , Reservoritis/diagnóstico , Embarazo , Estudios Retrospectivos , Adulto , Colitis Ulcerosa/cirugía , Proctocolectomía Restauradora/efectos adversos , Enfermedad Aguda , Complicaciones del Embarazo/etiología , Complicaciones del Embarazo/epidemiología , Factores de Riesgo , Adulto Joven , Reservorios Cólicos/efectos adversos , Antibacterianos/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
Despite the decreased rates in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) colectomies due to high advances in therapeutic options, a significant number of patients still require proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPPA) for ulcerative colitis (UC). Pouchitis is the most common complication in these patients, where up to 60% develop one episode of pouchitis in the first two years after UC surgery with IPAA with severe negative impact on their quality of life. Acute cases usually respond well to antibiotics, but 15% of patients will still develop a refractory disease that requires the initiation of advanced immunosuppressive therapies. For chronic idiopathic pouchitis, current recommendations suggest using the same therapeutic options as for IBD in terms of biologics and small molecules. However, the available data are limited regarding the effectiveness of different biologics or small molecules for the management of this condition, and all evidences arise from case series and small studies. Vedolizumab is the only biologic agent that has received approval for the treatment of adult patients with moderately to severely active chronic refractory pouchitis. Despite the fact that IBD treatment is rapidly evolving with the development of novel molecules, the presence of pouchitis represents an exclusion criterion in these trials. Recommendations for the approach of these conditions range from low to very low certainty of evidence, resulting from small randomized controlled trials and case series studies. The current review focuses on the therapeutic management of idiopathic pouchitis.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino , Reservoritis , Proctocolectomía Restauradora , Humanos , Reservoritis/tratamiento farmacológico , Reservoritis/etiología , Reservoritis/diagnóstico , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino/cirugía , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino/complicaciones , Enfermedad Crónica , Proctocolectomía Restauradora/efectos adversos , Proctocolectomía Restauradora/métodos , Enfermedad Aguda , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/uso terapéutico , Colitis Ulcerosa/cirugía , Colitis Ulcerosa/complicaciones , Colitis Ulcerosa/tratamiento farmacológico , Antibacterianos/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic immune-mediated disease that affects the entire colon and rectum with a relapsing and remitting course, causing lifelong morbidity. When medical treatment is ineffective, especially in cases of massive gastrointestinal bleeding, perforation, toxic megacolon, or carcinogenesis, surgery becomes the last line of defense to cure UC. Total colorectal resection and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) offer the best chance for long-term treatment. Pouchitis is the most common and troublesome postoperative complication. In this investigation, microsurgery is employed to create an ileal pouch model in experimental rats via IPAA surgery. Subsequently, a sustained rat model of pouchitis is established by inducing inflammation of the ileal pouch with dextran sulfate sodium (DSS). The successful establishment of rat pouchitis is validated through analysis of postoperative general status, weight, food and water intake, fecal data, as well as pouch tissue pathology, immunohistochemistry, and inflammatory factor analysis. This experimental animal model of pouchitis provides a foundation for studying the pathogenesis and treatment of the condition.
Asunto(s)
Reservorios Cólicos , Sulfato de Dextran , Modelos Animales de Enfermedad , Reservoritis , Proctocolectomía Restauradora , Animales , Reservoritis/etiología , Ratas , Proctocolectomía Restauradora/métodos , Proctocolectomía Restauradora/efectos adversos , Reservorios Cólicos/efectos adversos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Masculino , Anastomosis Quirúrgica/métodos , Anastomosis Quirúrgica/efectos adversosRESUMEN
Pouchitis is the most common long-term complication following ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) in patients with ulcerative colitis. Although several agents, including probiotics, steroids, and immunomodulators, have been used, the treatment of pouchitis remains challenging. Owing to the proven efficacy of biological therapy in inflammatory bowel disease, there is now growing evidence suggesting the potential benefits of biological therapy in refractory pouchitis. Here, we report the case of a 64-year-old woman with pouchitis due to ulcerative colitis who was successfully treated with ustekinumab (UST). The patient developed ulcerative pancolitis at the age of 35. Total colectomy and IPAA with J-pouch anastomosis were performed when the patient was 47 years old. Ileotomy closure was performed 6 months later. Postoperatively, the patient developed steroid-dependent pouchitis. Three years later, she developed steroid-induced diabetes. The patient has been taking 3mg of steroid for 20 years;therefore, her lifetime total steroid dose was 21g. The patient had over 20 episodes of bloody diarrhea a day. The last pouchoscopy in 20XX-9 revealed inflammatory stenosis with deep ulcerations of the afferent limb just before the ileoanal pouch junction. In July 20XX, when we took over her treatment, the policy of treatment was to withdraw her from steroids. Pouchoscopy revealed a widened but still tight afferent limb through which the scope could easily pass, and the ileoanal pouch still showed erosive ileitis without ulcers. Thiopurine administration and steroid tapering were initiated. Steroid tapering increased the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR). As ESR increased, her arthritis exacerbated. Six months after the end of steroid administration, the patient consented to UST treatment. On April 20XX+1, the patient received her first 260-mg UST infusion. At this point, she experienced 14-15 episodes of muddy bloody stools. She had no abdominal pain;however, she experienced shoulder pain. Gradually, UST affected both pouchitis and arthritis. UST treatment was continued at 90mg subcutaneously every 12 weeks without abdominal pain recurrence. Eight months after the first UST infusion, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs were no longer necessary for shoulder pain. Follow-up pouchoscopy performed 14 months after UST optimization revealed a normal afferent limb without ulcerations in either segment. Pouchitis remission was maintained for over 2 years.
Asunto(s)
Artritis , Colitis Ulcerosa , Reservorios Cólicos , Reservoritis , Proctocolectomía Restauradora , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Artritis/complicaciones , Artritis/cirugía , Colitis Ulcerosa/tratamiento farmacológico , Colitis Ulcerosa/cirugía , Colitis Ulcerosa/complicaciones , Reservoritis/tratamiento farmacológico , Reservoritis/etiología , Proctocolectomía Restauradora/efectos adversos , Dolor de Hombro/complicaciones , Dolor de Hombro/cirugía , Esteroides/efectos adversos , Ustekinumab/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
Pouchitis is defined as inflammation of the ileal pouch created during a restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Although the incidence of this inflammatory condition is high, the exact etiology often remains unclear and the management challenging. In this review, we summarize the clinical presentation, pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management of this common complication.
Asunto(s)
Reservoritis , Proctocolectomía Restauradora , Reservoritis/diagnóstico , Reservoritis/etiología , Reservoritis/terapia , Humanos , Proctocolectomía Restauradora/efectos adversos , Proctocolectomía Restauradora/métodos , Reservorios Cólicos/efectos adversos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/diagnóstico , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/terapia , Colitis Ulcerosa/cirugía , Colitis Ulcerosa/diagnósticoRESUMEN
Pouchitis is an acute or chronic inflammatory disease of the ileal reservoir. It is common after restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis, and treatment of chronic antibiotic-refractory pouchitis has proven challenging. Most cases of acute pouchitis evolve into chronic pouchitis. The aetiology of acute pouchitis is likely to be partly related to the gut microbiota, whereas the pathophysiology of chronic pouchitis involves abnormal interactions between genetic disposition, faecal stasis, the gut microbiota, dysregulated host immunity, surgical techniques, ischaemia and mesentery-related factors. Pouchoscopy with biopsy is the most valuable modality for diagnosis, disease monitoring, assessment of treatment response, dysplasia surveillance and delivery of endoscopic therapy. Triggering or risk factors, such as Clostridioides difficile infection and use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, should be modified or eradicated. In terms of treatment, acute pouchitis usually responds to oral antibiotics, whereas chronic antibiotic-refractory pouchitis often requires induction and maintenance therapy with integrin, interleukin or tumour necrosis factor inhibitors. Chronic pouchitis with ischaemic features, fistulae or abscesses can be treated with hyperbaric oxygen therapy.
Asunto(s)
Reservoritis , Proctocolectomía Restauradora , Reservoritis/terapia , Reservoritis/etiología , Reservoritis/diagnóstico , Reservoritis/fisiopatología , Humanos , Proctocolectomía Restauradora/efectos adversos , Microbioma Gastrointestinal , Enfermedad Crónica , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Factores de Riesgo , Enfermedad AgudaAsunto(s)
Reservorios Cólicos , Reservoritis , Proctocolectomía Restauradora , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Humanos , Reservoritis/etiología , Reservoritis/prevención & control , Reservorios Cólicos/efectos adversos , Proctocolectomía Restauradora/efectos adversos , Proctocolectomía Restauradora/métodos , Metaanálisis como Asunto , Anastomosis Quirúrgica/efectos adversos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Revisiones Sistemáticas como AsuntoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Radiographic imaging of the abdomen and pelvis plays an important role in the diagnosis and management of ileal pouch disorders with modalities including CT, MRI, contrasted pouchography, and defecography. OBJECTIVES: To perform a systematic review of the literature and describe applications of cross-sectional imaging, pouchography, defecography, and ultrasonography. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Google Scholar, and Cochrane database. STUDY SELECTION: Relevant articles on endoscopy in ileal pouches published between January 2003 and June 2023 in English were included on the basis of Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. INTERVENTION: Main abdominal and pelvic imaging modalities and their applications in the diagnosis of ileal pouch disorders were included. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Accuracy in characterization of ileal pouch disorders. RESULTS: CT is the test of choice for the evaluation of acute anastomotic leaks, perforation, and abscess(es). MRI of the pelvis is suitable for the assessment of chronic anastomotic leaks and their associated fistulas and sinus tracts, as well as for the penetrating phenotype of Crohn's disease of the pouch. CT enterography and magnetic resonance enterography are useful in assessing intraluminal, intramural, and extraluminal disease processes of the pouch and prepouch ileum. Water-soluble contrast pouchography is particularly useful for evaluating acute or chronic anastomotic leaks and outlines the shape and configuration of the pouch. Defecography is the key modality to evaluate structural and functional pouch inlet and outlet obstructions. Ultrasonography can be performed to assess the pouch in experienced IBD centers. LIMITATIONS: This is a qualitative, not quantitative, review of mainly case series and case reports. CONCLUSIONS: Abdominopelvic imaging, along with clinical and endoscopic evaluation, is imperative for accurately assessing structural, inflammatory, functional, and neoplastic disorders. See video from symposium .
Asunto(s)
Reservorios Cólicos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Humanos , Reservorios Cólicos/efectos adversos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Proctocolectomía Restauradora/efectos adversos , Proctocolectomía Restauradora/métodos , Defecografía/métodos , Ultrasonografía/métodos , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/métodos , Reservoritis/diagnóstico por imagen , Reservoritis/diagnóstico , Reservoritis/etiología , Fuga Anastomótica/diagnóstico por imagen , Fuga Anastomótica/etiología , Fuga Anastomótica/diagnóstico , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedad de Crohn/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedad de Crohn/cirugíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Restorative proctocolectomy and IPAA have become the surgical procedure of choice in pediatric patients with medically refractory colitis or familial adenomatous polyposis. OBJECTIVE: This systematic review aims to assess the diagnosis and treatment of pouch disorders in pediatric patients who undergo IPAA. DATA SOURCES: A literature search was performed using MEDLINE, Google Scholar, and Embase for all publications describing outcomes of pediatric IPAA. STUDY SELECTION: Studies between January 1, 2000, and September 7, 2022, published in English were included. Studies were excluded on the basis of title, abstract, and full-length review. INTERVENTIONS: IPAA. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Pouch disorders described include anastomotic leaks, pouch strictures, pouch failure, pouchitis, cuffitis, and de novo Crohn's disease of the pouch. RESULTS: Thirty-three studies were included in this review, all of which were retrospective in nature. The outcomes of 2643 pediatric patients were included in the 33 studies. LIMITATIONS: Management is largely informed by clinical practices in adult patients with scant data on treatment efficacy in children. CONCLUSIONS: The reported incidence of disorders of the pouch in children varies widely and is likely attributable to differences in definitions and follow-up periods across studies. Pouchitis was the most frequently described outcome. The overall rate of pouch failure in children is relatively low, with de novo Crohn's disease of the pouch being the most significant risk factor. Multicenter prospective studies are needed in the pediatric population to accurately identify risk factors, standardize the assessment of pouch complications, and determine effective treatment strategies. See video from the symposium .
Asunto(s)
Reservoritis , Proctocolectomía Restauradora , Humanos , Proctocolectomía Restauradora/efectos adversos , Proctocolectomía Restauradora/métodos , Niño , Reservoritis/diagnóstico , Reservoritis/terapia , Reservoritis/etiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/diagnóstico , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Reservorios Cólicos/efectos adversos , Colitis Ulcerosa/cirugía , Colitis Ulcerosa/diagnóstico , Colitis Ulcerosa/terapia , Poliposis Adenomatosa del Colon/cirugía , Poliposis Adenomatosa del Colon/diagnóstico , Fuga Anastomótica/diagnóstico , Fuga Anastomótica/etiología , Fuga Anastomótica/epidemiología , Fuga Anastomótica/terapia , Enfermedad de Crohn/diagnóstico , Enfermedad de Crohn/cirugía , Enfermedad de Crohn/terapia , Enfermedad de Crohn/complicacionesRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Restorative proctocolectomy with IPAA improves the quality of life in patients with ulcerative colitis by the removal of diseased large bowel and preservation of the natural route of defecation. Although the surgery may improve preexisting extraintestinal manifestations in the joints, skin, and eyes, extraintestinal manifestations, particularly primary sclerosing cholangitis, can persist after colectomy. OBJECTIVES: A systematic review of diagnosis and treatment of liver, joint, skin, and eye manifestations in patients with restorative proctocolectomy and IPAA for ulcerative colitis. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Google Scholar, and Cochrane database. STUDY SELECTION: Relevant articles on primary sclerosing cholangitis and extraintestinal manifestations in ileal pouches published between January 2001 and July 2023 in English were included on the basis of Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. INTERVENTION: Diagnosis and treatment of primary sclerosing cholangitis and extraintestinal manifestations in patients with restorative proctocolectomy and IPAA were included. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Association between primary sclerosing cholangitis, extraintestinal manifestations, and inflammatory disorders of the pouch and their management. RESULTS: Primary sclerosing cholangitis and extraintestinal manifestations are associated with pouchitis, particularly chronic pouchitis. Primary sclerosing cholangitis is associated with chronic pouchitis, enteritis, and possible pouch neoplasia. However, the disease severity and course of primary sclerosing cholangitis and pouchitis do not appear to be parallel. Despite the fact that oral vancomycin or budesonide have been used to treat primary sclerosing cholangitis-associated pouchitis, their impact on the disease course of primary sclerosing cholangitis is not known. Biological therapy for chronic inflammatory disorders of the pouch may also be beneficial for the concurrent extraintestinal manifestations of the joints, skin, and eyes. However, studies on the correlation between the severity of inflammatory pouch disorders and the severity of joint, skin, and eye diseases are lacking. LIMITATIONS: This is a qualitative, not quantitative, review of case series and case reports. CONCLUSIONS: Primary sclerosing cholangitis and extraintestinal manifestations of the joints, skin, and eyes appear to be associated with inflammatory disorders of the ileal pouch. Although the treatment of pouchitis does not seem to affect the disease course of primary sclerosing cholangitis, effective therapy of inflammatory pouch disorders, particularly with biologics, likely benefits concurrent disorders of the joints, skin, and eyes. See video from the symposium .
Asunto(s)
Colangitis Esclerosante , Colitis Ulcerosa , Reservoritis , Proctocolectomía Restauradora , Colangitis Esclerosante/complicaciones , Colangitis Esclerosante/cirugía , Humanos , Proctocolectomía Restauradora/efectos adversos , Proctocolectomía Restauradora/métodos , Reservoritis/etiología , Reservoritis/terapia , Reservoritis/diagnóstico , Colitis Ulcerosa/complicaciones , Colitis Ulcerosa/cirugía , Reservorios Cólicos/efectos adversos , Oftalmopatías/etiología , Enfermedades de la Piel/etiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: IPAA is often required for patients with ulcerative colitis or familial adenomatous polyposis after colectomy. This procedure reduces but does not completely eliminate the risk of neoplasia. OBJECTIVE: This study focuses on the histopathology of neoplasia in the ileal pouch, rectal cuff, and anal transition zone. DATA SOURCES: We performed a MEDLINE search for English-language studies published between 1981 and 2022 using the PubMed search engine. The terms "ileal pouch-anal anastomosis," "pouchitis," "pouch dysplasia," "pouch lymphoma," "pouch squamous cell carcinoma," "pouch adenocarcinoma," "pouch neoplasia," "dysplasia of rectal cuff," and "colitis-associated dysplasia" were used. STUDY SELECTION: Human studies of neoplasia occurring in the pouch and para-pouch were selected, and the full text was reviewed. Comparisons were made within and across studies, with key concepts selected for inclusion in this article. CONCLUSIONS: Neoplasia in the pouch is a rare complication in patients with IPAA. Annual endoscopic surveillance is recommended for familial adenomatous polyposis patients and ulcerative colitis patients with a history of prior dysplasia or carcinoma. In familial adenomatous polyposis, dysplastic polyps of the pouch are visible and readily amenable to endoscopic removal; however, glandular dysplasia in the setting of ulcerative colitis may be invisible on endoscopy. Therefore, random biopsies and adequate tissue sampling of the pouch and rectal cuff are recommended in this setting. The histological diagnosis of IBD-associated dysplasia can be challenging and should be confirmed by at least 1 expert GI pathologist. See video from the symposium.
Asunto(s)
Poliposis Adenomatosa del Colon , Reservorios Cólicos , Proctocolectomía Restauradora , Humanos , Poliposis Adenomatosa del Colon/patología , Poliposis Adenomatosa del Colon/cirugía , Poliposis Adenomatosa del Colon/complicaciones , Reservorios Cólicos/efectos adversos , Reservorios Cólicos/patología , Proctocolectomía Restauradora/efectos adversos , Colitis Ulcerosa/patología , Colitis Ulcerosa/complicaciones , Colitis Ulcerosa/cirugía , Reservoritis/patología , Reservoritis/etiología , Reservoritis/diagnóstico , Adenocarcinoma/patología , Adenocarcinoma/etiología , Adenocarcinoma/cirugía , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino/patología , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino/complicacionesRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Structural and inflammatory adverse sequelae are common after restorative proctocolectomy and IPAA. On rare occasions, neoplasia can occur in patients with ileal pouches. Pouchoscopy plays a key role in the diagnosis, differential diagnosis, disease monitoring, assessment of treatment response, surveillance, and delivery of therapy. OBJECTIVE: A systematic review of the literature was performed, and principles and techniques of pouchoscopy were described. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Google Scholar, and Cochrane databases. STUDY SELECTION: Relevant articles on endoscopy in ileal pouches published between January 2000 and May 2023 were included based on Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. INTERVENTION: Diagnostic, surveillance, and therapeutic endoscopy in ileal pouch disorders were included. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Accurate characterization of the ileal pouch in healthy or diseased states. RESULTS: The main anatomic structures of a J- or S-pouch are the stoma closure site, prepouch ileum, inlet, tip of the "J," pouch body, anastomosis, cuff, and anal transition zone. Each anatomic location can be prone to the development of structural, inflammatory, or neoplastic disorders. For example, ulcers and strictures are common at the stoma closure site, inlet, and anastomosis. Leaks are commonly detected at the tip of the "J" and anastomosis. Characterization of the anastomotic distribution of inflammation is critical for the differential diagnosis of subtypes of pouchitis and other inflammatory disorders of the pouch. Neoplastic lesions, albeit rare, mainly occur at the cuff, anal transition zone, or anastomosis. LIMITATIONS: This is a qualitative, not quantitative, review of mainly case series. CONCLUSIONS: Most structural, inflammatory, and neoplastic disorders can be reliably diagnosed with a careful pouchoscopy. The endoscopist and other clinicians taking care of pouch patients should be familiar with the anatomy of the ileal pouch and be able to recognize common abnormalities. See video from symposium.
Asunto(s)
Reservorios Cólicos , Reservoritis , Proctocolectomía Restauradora , Humanos , Reservorios Cólicos/efectos adversos , Proctocolectomía Restauradora/efectos adversos , Proctocolectomía Restauradora/métodos , Reservoritis/etiología , Reservoritis/diagnóstico , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/diagnóstico , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Endoscopía Gastrointestinal/métodos , Íleon/cirugía , Íleon/patologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Clinical, nonspecific pouchitis is common after restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis, but its cause is unknown. A possible lack of protection for the ileal mucosa in its role as a reservoir for colonic-type bacteria may be the missing piece in defining the causes of pouchitis. OBJECTIVE: The study aimed to review the causes of pouchitis and introduce the hypothesis that inadequate mucus protection in the pouch, combined with a predisposition to abnormal inflammation, is the most common cause of nonspecific pouchitis. DATA SOURCES: Review of PubMed and MEDLINE for articles discussing pouchitis and intestinal mucus. STUDY SELECTION: Studies published from 1960 to 2023. The main search terms were "pouchitis," and "intestinal mucus," whereas Boolean operators were used with multiple other terms to refine the search. Duplicates and case reports were excluded. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Current theories about the cause of pouchitis, descriptions of the role of mucus in the physiology of intestinal protection, and evidence of the effects of lack of mucus on mucosal inflammation. RESULTS: The crossreference of "intestinal mucus" with "pouchitis" produced 9 references, none of which discussed the role of mucus in the development of pouchitis. Crossing "intestinal mucus" with "pouch" resulted in 32 articles, combining "pouchitis" with "barrier function" yielded 37 articles, and "pouchitis" with "permeability" yielded only 8 articles. No article discussed the mucus coat as a barrier to bacterial invasion of the epithelium or mentioned inadequate mucus as a factor in pouchitis. However, an ileal pouch produces a colonic environment in the small bowel, and the ileum lacks the mucus protection needed for this sort of environment. This predisposes pouch mucosa to bacterial invasion and chronic microscopic inflammation that may promote clinical pouchitis in patients prone to an autoimmune response. LIMITATIONS: No prior studies address inadequate mucus protection and the origin of proctitis. There is no objective way of measuring the autoimmune tendency in patients with ulcerative colitis. CONCLUSIONS: Studies of intestinal mucus in the ileal pouch and its association with pouchitis are warranted.
Asunto(s)
Colitis Ulcerosa , Reservorios Cólicos , Reservoritis , Proctocolectomía Restauradora , Humanos , Reservoritis/etiología , Reservoritis/prevención & control , Colitis Ulcerosa/cirugía , Colitis Ulcerosa/complicaciones , Proctocolectomía Restauradora/efectos adversos , Proctocolectomía Restauradora/métodos , Íleon/cirugía , Reservorios Cólicos/efectos adversos , Mucosa Intestinal/cirugía , Inflamación/complicacionesRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to assess the efficacy and safety of faecal microbiota transplantation [FMT] in the treatment of chronic pouchitis. METHODS: A PRISMA-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted using the following databases and clinical trial registers: Medline, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews [CENTRAL], clinical trials.gov, ScienceDirect, and VHL [virtual health library]. The primary outcome was clinical response/remission in patients treated with FMT. Secondary outcomes included safety profile, quality of life, and changes in the gut microbiome. RESULTS: Seven observational cohort studies/case series and two randomised, controlled trials with a total of 103 patients were included. The route, preparation, and quantity of FMT administered varied among the included studies. Clinical response rate of 42.6% with a remission rate of 29.8% was estimated in our cohort following FMT therapy. Minor, self-limiting, adverse events were reported, and the treatment was well tolerated with good short- and long-term safety profiles. Successful FMT engraftment in recipients varied and, on average, microbial richness and diversity was lower in patients with pouchitis. In some instances, shifts with specific changes towards abundance of species, suggestive of a 'healthier' pouch microbiota, were observed following treatment with FMT. CONCLUSION: The evidence for FMT in the treatment of chronic pouchitis is sparse, which limits any recommendations being made for its use in clinical practice. Current evidence from low-quality studies suggests a variable clinical response and remission rate, but the treatment is well tolerated, with a good safety profile. This review emphasises the need for rationally designed, well-powered, randomised, placebo-controlled trials to understand the efficacy of FMT for the treatment of pouchitis.
Asunto(s)
Microbioma Gastrointestinal , Reservoritis , Humanos , Trasplante de Microbiota Fecal/efectos adversos , Reservoritis/terapia , Reservoritis/etiología , Calidad de Vida , Inducción de Remisión , Resultado del Tratamiento , Heces , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como AsuntoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Our understanding of the epidemiology of inflammatory conditions of the pouch and effectiveness of treatment is largely based on selected populations. We created a state-level registry to evaluate the incidence of pouchitis and the effectiveness of treatments used in an initial episode of pouchitis. METHODS: In a state-level retrospective cohort of all patients undergoing proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) for ulcerative colitis between January 1, 2018, and December 31, 2020, we evaluated the incidence of pouchitis and compared the proportion of patients developing recurrent pouchitis and chronic antibiotic-dependent pouchitis according to initial antibiotic therapy. RESULTS: A total of 177 patients underwent surgery with 49 (28%) developing pouchitis within the 12 months after the final stage of IPAA. Patients with extraintestinal manifestations of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) were significantly more likely to develop pouchitis within the first 12 months after IPAA (adjusted odds ratio 2.45, 95% confidence interval 1.03-5.81) after adjusting for family history of IBD (adjusted odds ratio 3.50, 95% 1.50-8.18). When comparing the proportion of patients who developed recurrent pouchitis or chronic antibiotic-dependent pouchitis with those who experienced an isolated episode of pouchitis, there were no significant differences among the initial antibiotic regimens used. DISCUSSION: In a state-level examination of outcomes after IPAA for ulcerative colitis, patients with extraintestinal manifestations of IBD were more likely to develop pouchitis; however, the initial antibiotic regimen chosen did not seem to affect long-term outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Colitis Ulcerosa , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino , Reservoritis , Humanos , Reservoritis/epidemiología , Reservoritis/etiología , Colitis Ulcerosa/epidemiología , Colitis Ulcerosa/cirugía , Colitis Ulcerosa/complicaciones , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino/epidemiología , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino/cirugía , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino/complicaciones , Antibacterianos/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Pouchitis is the most common complication after restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis. This American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) guideline is intended to support practitioners in the management of pouchitis and inflammatory pouch disorders. METHODS: A multidisciplinary panel of content experts and guideline methodologists used the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation framework to prioritize clinical questions, identify patient-centered outcomes, conduct an evidence synthesis, and develop recommendations for the prevention and treatment of pouchitis, Crohn's-like disease of the pouch, and cuffitis. RESULTS: The AGA guideline panel made 9 conditional recommendations. In patients with ulcerative colitis who have undergone ileal pouch-anal anastomosis and experience intermittent symptoms of pouchitis, the AGA suggests using antibiotics for the treatment of pouchitis. In patients who experience recurrent episodes of pouchitis that respond to antibiotics, the AGA suggests using probiotics for the prevention of recurrent pouchitis. In patients who experience recurrent pouchitis that responds to antibiotics but relapses shortly after stopping antibiotics (also known as "chronic antibiotic-dependent pouchitis"), the AGA suggests using chronic antibiotic therapy to prevent recurrent pouchitis; however, in patients who are intolerant to antibiotics or who are concerned about the risks of long-term antibiotic therapy, the AGA suggests using advanced immunosuppressive therapies (eg, biologics and/or oral small molecule drugs) approved for treatment of inflammatory bowel disease. In patients who experience recurrent pouchitis with inadequate response to antibiotics (also known as "chronic antibiotic-refractory pouchitis"), the AGA suggests using advanced immunosuppressive therapies; corticosteroids can also be considered in these patients. In patients who develop symptoms due to Crohn's-like disease of the pouch, the AGA suggests using corticosteroids and advanced immunosuppressive therapies. In patients who experience symptoms due to cuffitis, the AGA suggests using therapies that have been approved for the treatment of ulcerative colitis, starting with topical mesalamine or topical corticosteroids. The panel also proposed key implementation considerations for optimal management of pouchitis and Crohn's-like disease of the pouch and identified several knowledge gaps and areas for future research. CONCLUSIONS: This guideline provides a comprehensive, patient-centered approach to the management of patients with pouchitis and other inflammatory conditions of the pouch.
Asunto(s)
Colitis Ulcerosa , Enfermedad de Crohn , Reservoritis , Proctocolectomía Restauradora , Humanos , Reservoritis/diagnóstico , Reservoritis/tratamiento farmacológico , Reservoritis/etiología , Colitis Ulcerosa/diagnóstico , Colitis Ulcerosa/cirugía , Colitis Ulcerosa/complicaciones , Proctocolectomía Restauradora/efectos adversos , Enfermedad de Crohn/diagnóstico , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , CorticoesteroidesRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: This systematic review explored different medications and methods for prevention and treatment of pouchitis after restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA). METHODS: PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched for randomized clinical trials that assessed prevention or treatment of pouchitis. The systematic review was reported in line with updated 2020 PRISMA guidelines. Risk of bias in the trials included was assessed using the ROB-2 tool and certainty of evidence was assessed using GRADE. The main outcomes were the incidence of new pouchitis episodes in the preventative studies and resolution or improvement of active pouchitis in the treatment studies. RESULTS: Fifteen randomized trials were included. A meta-analysis of 7 trials on probiotics revealed significantly lower odds of pouchitis with the use of probiotics (RR: 0.26, 95% CI: 0.16-0.42, I2 = 20%, p < 0.001) and similar odds of adverse effects to placebo (RR: 2.43, 95% CI: 0.11-55.9, I2 = 0, p = 0.579). One trial investigated the prophylactic role of allopurinol in preventing pouchitis and found a comparable incidence of pouchitis in the two groups (31% vs 28%; p = 0.73). Seven trials assessed different treatments for active pouchitis. One recorded the resolution of pouchitis in all patients treated with ciprofloxacin versus 67% treated with metronidazole. Both budesonide enema and oral metronidazole were associated with similar significant improvement in pouchitis (58.3% vs 50%, p = 0.67). Rifaximin, adalimumab, fecal microbiota transplantation, and bismuth carbomer foam enema were not effective in treating pouchitis. CONCLUSIONS: Probiotics are effective in preventing pouchitis after IPAA. Antibiotics, including ciprofloxacin and metronidazole, are likely effective in treating active pouchitis.
Asunto(s)
Colitis Ulcerosa , Reservoritis , Proctocolectomía Restauradora , Humanos , Reservoritis/etiología , Reservoritis/prevención & control , Metronidazol/efectos adversos , Colitis Ulcerosa/cirugía , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Proctocolectomía Restauradora/efectos adversos , Ciprofloxacina/uso terapéutico , Anastomosis Quirúrgica/efectos adversosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To compare the effect of liver transplantation (LT) on ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) outcomes in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis and inflammatory bowel disease (PSC-IBD). BACKGROUND: Patients with PSC-IBD may require both IPAA for colitis and LT for PSC. METHODS: Patients with PSC-IBD from out institutional pouch registry (1985-2022) were divided according to LT status and timing of LT (before and after IPAA) and their outcomes analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 160 patients were included: 112 (70%) nontransplanted at last follow-up; 48 (30%) transplanted, of which 23 (14%) before IPAA and 25 (16%) after. Nontransplanted patients at IPAA had more laparoscopic procedures [37 (46%) vs 8 (18%), P =0.002] and less blood loss (median 250 vs 400 mL, P =0.006). Morbidity and mortality at 90 days were similar. Chronic pouchitis was higher in transplanted compared with nontransplanted patients [32 (67%) vs 51 (45.5%), P =0.03], but nontransplanted patients had a higher rate of chronic antibiotic refractory pouchitis. Overall survival was similar, but nontransplanted patients had more PSC-related deaths (12.5% vs 2%, P =0.002). Pouch survival at 10 years was 90% for nontransplanted patients and 100% for transplanted patients (log-rank P =0.052). Timing of LT had no impact on chronic pouchitis, pouch failure, or overall survival. PSC recurrence was 6% at 10 years. For transplanted patients, graft survival was similar regardless of IPAA timing. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with PSC-IBD and IPAA, LT is linked to an increased pouchitis rate but does not affect overall and pouch survival. Timing of LT does not influence short-term and long-term pouch outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Colangitis Esclerosante , Colitis Ulcerosa , Reservorios Cólicos , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino , Trasplante de Hígado , Reservoritis , Proctocolectomía Restauradora , Humanos , Reservoritis/etiología , Reservoritis/cirugía , Colangitis Esclerosante/complicaciones , Colangitis Esclerosante/cirugía , Reservorios Cólicos/efectos adversos , Colitis Ulcerosa/cirugía , Proctocolectomía Restauradora/efectos adversos , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino/complicaciones , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino/cirugía , Anastomosis Quirúrgica/efectos adversosRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: There is minimal evidence regarding the comparative effectiveness of individual antibiotics in the treatment of pouchitis. We sought to evaluate the comparative effectiveness of ciprofloxacin monotherapy, metronidazole monotherapy, and combination therapy (ciprofloxacin and metronidazole) in the treatment of an initial episode of pouchitis after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis (UC). METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study in TriNetX, a global federated research network of electronic health records. Primary outcomes were failure of initial antibiotic therapy and the development of recurrent pouchitis in the first 12 months after an initial episode of pouchitis. One-to-one propensity score matching was performed for age, sex, race, primary sclerosing cholangitis, nicotine dependence, obesity, and previous exposure to tumor necrosis factor inhibitors between the cohorts. RESULTS: Among 271 patients who developed pouchitis (mean age at ileal pouch-anal anastomosis 35.8 years, male sex 57%) and were treated with ciprofloxacin, metronidazole, or combination therapy, 190 (70%) developed recurrent pouchitis. After propensity score matching, there was no significant difference in the odds of early relapse or nonresponse with ciprofloxacin compared with metronidazole monotherapy (adjusted odds ratio 0.56, 95% confidence interval 0.23-1.34) or when either monotherapy was compared with combination therapy. There was also no significant difference in odds of recurrent pouchitis when comparing patients treated with ciprofloxacin with metronidazole monotherapy (adjusted odds ratio 0.86, 95% confidence interval 0.40-1.84) or either monotherapy with combination therapy. DISCUSSION: In this retrospective cohort study, we demonstrated no significant difference in the real-world effectiveness of ciprofloxacin, metronidazole, or combination therapy for the initial episode of pouchitis.
Asunto(s)
Colitis Ulcerosa , Reservoritis , Proctocolectomía Restauradora , Humanos , Masculino , Metronidazol/uso terapéutico , Ciprofloxacina/uso terapéutico , Reservoritis/tratamiento farmacológico , Reservoritis/etiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Proctocolectomía Restauradora/efectos adversos , Colitis Ulcerosa/tratamiento farmacológicoRESUMEN
Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (RP/IPAA) is the procedure of choice for patients with ulcerative colitis (UC), some patients with colonic Crohn's disease (CD), and those with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP); albeit, owing to its complexity, it should be performed by experienced professionals. RP/IPAA is the recommended surgical treatment for UC when the standard medical therapy is ineffective. This procedure has been demonstrated to provide patients with a good quality of life, such as in FAP patients with extensive disease in the rectum. The CD has been associated with higher rates of perianal involvement and disease recurrence, but some patients with CD limited to the large intestine and minimal perianal or ileal disease may also be considered for this operation. First, all patients undergo a detailed preoperative evaluation that includes a review of previous imaging, pathology, and colonoscopy findings, a perianal examination, an evaluation of the anorectal functions, mechanical bowel preparation, and prophylaxis against deep venous thrombosis and infectious complications. A staged approach is the most commonly preferred technique for RP/IPAA, which can be performed in 2 or 3 stages. The IPAA can be performed by laparoscopic, robotic, or open approach. The type of approach is determined based on the patient's condition, medication used, elective or emergency setting, and the surgeon's expertise level. A successful IPAA requires tension-free pouch anastomosis. The most common IPAA pouch types are the J or S pouches; alternatively, an H pouch may be created, which is mainly used in redo pouches. In experienced centers, > 95% of the patients become stoma-free in 10 years. IPAA is a complex procedure, and the complications after pouch surgery are pouchitis, pelvic sepsis, pouch failure, or anastomotic stricture. The majority of long-term complications can be prevented in such cases with a comprehensive preoperative evaluation and through the use of appropriate surgical techniques and postoperative care conducted at experienced centers. The techniques for performing RP/IPAA with their long-term outcomes have been reviewed in this article.