Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
BMC Ophthalmol ; 23(1): 355, 2023 Aug 14.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37574556

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: We present the management and follow-up of a case of uveal effusion syndrome (UES). CASE PRESENTATION: We study the relevant recent literature reports and review the aetiology, clinical classification, pathogenesis, diagnostic characteristics, treatment methods, and prognosis of this disease. When we encounter UES patients clinically, we can classify them according to their clinical characteristics and adopt different treatment plans for different types. The retina of this patient reattached 5 months after receiving eight periocular injections of triamcinolone acetonide (TA). CONCLUSIONS: For type III UES patients, local hormone therapy can be applied, and follow-up should be done to optimize the clinical outcome.


Asunto(s)
Síndrome de Efusión Uveal , Humanos , Estudios de Seguimiento , Síndrome de Efusión Uveal/tratamiento farmacológico , Triamcinolona Acetonida/uso terapéutico , Glucocorticoides/uso terapéutico , Retina
2.
Retin Cases Brief Rep ; 15(4): 339-343, 2021 Jul 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30614924

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: To describe the use of topical mitomycin-C in sclerostomy revision for recalcitrant idiopathic uveal effusion syndrome. METHODS: A 50-year-old healthy man presented with painless, gradual vision loss in the right eye. He underwent multimodal retinal imaging with wide-field fundus photography, spectral domain optical coherence tomography, and B-scan and A-scan ultrasonography. He was found to have idiopathic (non-nanophthalmic) uveal effusion syndrome with choroidal and serous retinal detachments in the right eye and a peripheral choroidal detachment in the left eye. Central vision became threatened in the right eye. Medical treatment with oral corticosteroids and surgical treatment with choroidal drainage through sclerostomies and sclerostomy revision were administered. RESULTS: Initial treatment with systemic corticosteroids was ineffective. Subsequent choroidal drainage through sclerostomies only partially resolved the effusion. Later sclerostomy revision with application of topical mitomycin-C led to complete resolution with anatomical stability maintained after at least 42 months of follow-up. CONCLUSION: Successful use of topical mitomycin-C in sclerostomy revision has not previously been reported in idiopathic (non-nanophthalmic) uveal effusion syndrome. We propose that topical mitomycin-C may be considered as a potential therapeutic adjunct in the treatment of refractory idiopathic uveal effusion syndrome before further sclerostomy procedures are attempted in additional quadrants of the eye.


Asunto(s)
Mitomicina , Esclerostomía , Síndrome de Efusión Uveal , Administración Tópica , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mitomicina/administración & dosificación , Resultado del Tratamiento , Síndrome de Efusión Uveal/tratamiento farmacológico , Síndrome de Efusión Uveal/cirugía
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA