Is CT or MRI the optimal imaging investigation for the diagnosis of large vestibular aqueduct syndrome and large endolymphatic sac anomaly?

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: We explored whether there was a difference between measurements obtained with CT and MRI for the diagnosis of large vestibular aqueduct syndrome or large endolymphatic sac anomaly, and whether this influenced diagnosis on the basis of previously published threshold values (Valvassori and Cincinnati). We also investigated whether isolated dilated extra-osseous endolymphatic sac occurred on MRI. Secondary objectives were to compare inter-observer reproducibility for the measurements, and to investigate any mismatch between the diagnoses using the different criteria. MATERIALS/METHODS: Subjects diagnosed with large vestibular aqueduct syndrome or large endolymphatic sac anomalies were retrospectively analysed. For subjects with both CT and MRI available (n = 58), two independent observers measured the midpoint and operculum widths. For subjects with MRI (± CT) available (n = 84), extra-osseous sac widths were also measured. Results There was no significant difference between the width measurements obtained with CT versus MRI. CT alone diagnosed large vestibular aqueduct syndrome or large endolymphatic sac anomalies in 2/58 (Valvassori) and 4/58 (Cincinnati), whilst MRI alone diagnosed them in 2/58 (Valvassori). There was 93% CT/MRI diagnostic agreement using both criteria. Only 1/84 demonstrated isolated extra-osseous endolymphatic sac dilatation. The MRI-based LVAS/LESA diagnosis was less dependent on which criteria were used. Midpoint measurements are more reproducible between observers and between CT/MR imaging modalities. CONCLUSION: Supplementing MRI with CT results in additional diagnoses using either criterion, however, there is no net increased diagnostic sensitivity for CT versus MRI when applying the Valvassori criteria. Isolated enlargement of the extra-osseous endolymphatic sac is rare.

Magnetic resonance imaging features of large endolymphatic sac compartments: audiological and clinical correlates.

OBJECTIVES: (1) To study the prevalence and characteristics of large endolymphatic sac internal compartments on thin-section T2- and T2*-weighted magnetic resonance imaging, and to relate these to other large endolymphatic sac magnetic resonance imaging features, and (2) to correlate the compartment imaging features, endolymphatic sac size and labyrinthine anomalies with the patients' clinical and audiological data. METHOD: Magnetic resonance imaging studies for 38 patients with large endolymphatic sac anomalies were retrospectively reviewed in a tertiary referral centre. Endolymphatic sac compartment presence, morphology and imaging signal were assessed. Endolymphatic sac size and labyrinthine anomalies were also recorded. Endolymphatic sac compartments and other imaging features were correlated with clinical and audiological data. RESULTS: Compartments were present in 57 per cent of the imaged endolymphatic sacs, but their presence alone did not correlate with other imaging features or clinical data. The endolymphatic sac : internal auditory meatus signal ratio was associated with a history of sudden or fluctuating hearing loss. Hearing loss correlated with opercular and extraosseous endolymphatic sac size measurements. A larger midpoint intraosseous endolymphatic sac size was associated with clear fluid loss at cochlear implantation. CONCLUSION: The magnetic resonance imaging characteristics of large endolymphatic sac compartments have been defined. The endolymphatic sac size and distal compartment signal should be recorded, as these provide prognostic information and assist the planning of appropriate interventions.

Vestibular signs and symptoms of volumetric abnormalities of the vestibular aqueduct.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to identify a pattern of signs, symptoms and neuroradiological findings which would assist investigation of vestibular function (especially otolith function) in a group of adult patients with anatomical alterations of the endolymphatic aqueduct and sac. METHODS: Fifteen subjects affected by volumetric abnormalities of the vestibular aqueduct were selected from a cohort of patients referred to a tertiary referral neurotological centre between 1 January 2004 and 30 June 2006. All patients underwent accurate clinical history-taking and were evaluated using a standardised set of bedside and instrumental neurotological tests (i.e. audiometry, auditory brainstem response and vestibular evoked myogenic potentials). After these tests, each patient underwent computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in order to accurately evaluate the middle ear, labyrinthine capsule and internal auditory canals. These evaluations confirmed clinical suspicion of volumetric abnormalities of the vestibular aqueduct and endolymphatic sac. RESULTS: All the patients with a defined volumetric alteration in the region of the vestibular aqueduct and endolympatic sac reported a typical pattern of symptoms and signs. The most obvious and frequent symptoms in these patients were migraine-related vertigo (using the Neuhauser criteria, 10 of 15, 66.6 per cent), 'motion sickness' (12 of 15, 80 per cent), oscillopsia (nine of 15, 60 per cent) and dizziness (14 of 15, 93.3 per cent). Clinical examination results for the selected patients allowed some useful speculative conclusions. During neurotological evaluation, two instrumental methodologies were especially useful diagnostically: vestibular evoked myogenic potentials of the neck, and the mastoid vibration test at 100 Hz. CONCLUSIONS: Dysfunction of the vestibular aqueduct is suggested by symptomatology characterised by: migraine-related vertigo, unstable or recurring oscillopsia, lowering of the vestibular evoked myogenic potential threshold, hypoacusis, anamnestic report of motion sickness, and nystagmus induced by mastoid vibration and head-shaking. Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging are needed in order to confirm clinical suspicions.

The large vestibular aqueduct--case report and review of the literature.

Patients with a large vestibular aqueduct (LVA) suffer from a loss of hearing in childhood at an early onset. An acute loss of hearing can be precipitated by minor head trauma. Until now there seems to be no sufficient therapy for stopping the progression of a loss of hearing. It has been shown that a cochlear implantation is a worthwhile procedure if the patient is almost deaf. We report the case of a patient with a bilateral LVA. A loss of hearing was confirmed at the age of 16 months. Exposure to loud noise triggered an acute progression of the hearing loss. At the age of 18 years, LVA was confirmed radiologically, revealing an enlarged endolymphatic duct and sac in MRI scans and an enlarged vestibular aqueduct in the CT scan. We successfully performed a cochlear implant (MED-EL, Combi 40+ flex). Proceeding from this case report, the paper reviews the literature on LVA.

Can a fixed measure serve as a pertinent diagnostic criterion for large vestibular aqueduct in children?

BACKGROUND: A vestibular aqueduct midpoint width greater than 1.50 mm is currently considered to be pathognomonic for a large vestibular aqueduct syndrome. OBJECTIVE: To analyse the diameter of the vestibular aqueduct in children as a function of age and consequently to determine if a fixed measure could serve as a pertinent diagnostic criterion. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective study of 200 high-resolution CT scans of the ear in 100 patients aged 0-16 years and from various paediatric medical departments. On each CT scan, the lateral semicircular canal diameter, the vestibular aqueduct midpoint width between the external aperture and common crus, and the vestibular aqueduct external aperture diameter were measured. Spearman's rank test and the Mann-Whitney correlation test were used for an integrated statistical analysis. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant variability in vestibular aqueduct diameter as a function of age or sex of patients. CONCLUSION: A CT scan threshold value, fixed and independent of age and sex, is thus legitimate for the diagnosis of vestibular aqueduct dilatation.

Imaging and clinical findings in large endolymphatic duct and sac syndrome.

OBJECTIVE: Large endolymphatic duct and sac syndrome (LEDS) is known as the most common kind of inner ear malformations, which is radiologically detectable. Nevertheless, nowadays many questions are not fully cleared and LEDS is relatively unknown among general radiologists. The aim of this study was to evaluate the incidence of LEDS in the own patient population and to present our experiences regarding imaging findings, clinical presentation and follow up. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Based on a complete recording of all patients, sent from ENT department to radiology, we identified all radiological diagnosed cases of inner ear malformations including LEDS and all patients in whom an inner ear malformation was clinically suspected. The retrospective study included clinical records, HR-CT and MRI performed between 1994 and 2002. RESULTS: Among 169 patients (338 ear), 17 of patients (median age: 12 years) and 28 ears, respectively, had enlarged endolymphatic structures. In 10 patients - 6% - (15 ears), no other abnormalities were detected, called isolated LEDS, seven patients showed additional inner ear abnormalities. One patient showed a labyrinthine hemorrhage after sudden hearing loss. Audiometric data revealed sensorineural hearing loss in 22 ears, deafness in 5 ears and normal hearing in 1 case of 28 ears. In 10 (67%) of 15 ears with isolated LEDS, the hearing loss was downward-fluctuating progressive. Twelve patients (eight with isolated LEDS) had partly repeated sudden hearing losses. A trigger for worsening of hearing was found in five patients. A correlation between the severity of morphological changes on imaging and the degree of hearing disturbances could not be detected. Only four young patients underwent a radiological examination within the first or second year after onset of hearing loss. Three patients received a cochlear implant. CONCLUSIONS: LEDS might be the cause of progressive hearing loss and repeated acute hearing losses in children and young adults. Imaging plays an important role in making the diagnosis.

Distal renal tubular acidosis associated with large vestibular aqueduct and sensorineural hearing loss.

CONCLUSIONS: Hearing loss and equilibrium dysfunction have different etiologies in patients with large vestibular aqueduct syndrome. We suggest that all children with distal renal tubular acidosis (dRTA) should be subjected to an equilibrium study and audiological evaluation, as well as to a CT or MRI scan. OBJECTIVE: dRTA has been described in association with sensorineural hearing loss, but there are no reported cases that have been examined in detail using audiological and equilibrium studies. We report here a case of progressive sensorineural hearing loss with a large vestibular aqueduct and dRTA, and the results of audiological and equilibrium studies. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A 31-year-old female presented with hearing loss, tinnitus and vertigo. She had been treated with oral sodium citrate, potassium citrate and potassium chloride supplementation because of dRTA since the age of 1 month. RESULTS: The pure-tone audiogram of the patient was off the scale for the right ear and showed progressive sensorineural hearing loss for the left ear. Ice-water caloric testing showed canal paresis on the left side. Temporal bone CT and inner ear MRI revealed a large vestibular aqueduct and a large endolymphatic sac on both sides.

Enlarged endolymphatic duct and sac syndrome: relationship between MR findings and genotype of mutation in Pendred syndrome gene.

Pendred syndrome (PDS) is characterized by profound deafness in childhood, positive perchlorate challenge, and goiter. PDS is often associated with enlarged endolymphatic duct and sac (EEDS), and recently, PDS gene mutations have been reported even in those patients with EEDS without classic Pendred syndrome. In a previous report, the number of mutant alleles was correlated with the degree of subclinical thyroid abnormality, but not with hearing loss, in patients with missense mutation H723R. It also has been reported that the hearing loss in EEDS was not correlated with the EEDS volume, cochlear modiolar area, or signal intensity of the endolymphatic sac. We evaluated the correlations between the number of mutant alleles and these parameters in patients with EEDS to investigate the mechanisms underlying this condition. The study group was comprised of 16 Japanese patients with EEDS diagnosed by MR imaging. The H723R mutation was homozygous in six patients and heterozygous in six patients, with no mutation found in four patients. The modiolar area, EEDS volume, and signal intensity ratio (sac signal/cerebrospinal fluid signal) were not significantly correlated with the number of mutant alleles. PDS gene mutations may not be the only cause of EEDS, and the mechanisms underlying EEDS remain unclear.