RESUMEN
Abstract: Assisted reproduction techniques (ARTs) have given rise to novel, non-traditional family models. Still, among the various applications and approaches of 'medically assisted procreation' (MAP), the most divisive one undoubtedly is 'gestational surrogacy' (GS), also in light of the rising number of couples who have chosen it over the past twenty years. Another major implication of ARTs is the creation of intentional (or intended) parenthood in addition to genetic one: the genetic parent's partner is thus defined as the intentional (or second) parent, who by free choice, shares the family project with the genetic parent, even without any biological tie with the child. Hence, the intended parent takes on the same rights and responsibilities towards the child as the biological one. Several countries, including Italy, have enacted norms to discourage cross-border surrogacy, deeming it harmful to the dignity of women and children. Recently, however, the Italian government has decided intensify the fight against this practice: the Chamber of Deputies (Italy's lower chamber of parliament) has passed a law which punishes couples that resort to surrogacy even if the agreement and the birth take place abroad. Therefore, surrogacy would become a so-called universal crime. In light of the fact that criminalization is a serious and highly consequential step, which may have life-changing consequences for the intended parents, the aim of this paper is to assess whether this may be an effective instrument for regulating the interests at stake and, therefore, whether it would be desirable for other countries to follow such a model. Ultimately, it is worth remarking that for those who seek to achieve parenthood, such a desire is among the most profound aspects of a person's existential realization. When due to a delicate balance of ethics standards and potentially conflicting rights, lawmakers inter-vene, an authoritarian approach is unlikely to be beneficial. Offering real alternatives to surrogacy in an organic and pragmatic fashion (i.e. expediting adoption procedures, favoring motherhood at a younger age, when infertility issues are less likely to have set in) may be the best way to disincentivize fertility traveling and make sure the rights, hopes and aspirations of all the parties involved are upheld properly.
Asunto(s)
Madres Sustitutas , Humanos , Madres Sustitutas/legislación & jurisprudencia , Italia , Femenino , Técnicas Reproductivas Asistidas/ética , Técnicas Reproductivas Asistidas/legislación & jurisprudencia , Embarazo , Discusiones Bioéticas/legislación & jurisprudencia , Turismo Médico/legislación & jurisprudencia , Turismo Médico/ética , Padres , Crimen/legislación & jurisprudencia , NiñoRESUMEN
Objective: Infertility remains a global challenge, with assisted reproductive technology (ART) progressively gaining relevance in developing countries, including Ghana. However, associated ethico-legal challenges have not received the needed policy attention. This study explored the legal and ethical challenges of ART practice in Ghana. Design: The study employed an exploratory phenomenological approach to examine ART in Ghana, focusing on ethics and law governing this practice. Participants: Respondents were ART practitioners, managers, facility owners, representatives of surrogacy/gamete donor agencies, and regulatory body representatives. Methods: A semi-structured interview guide was used to collect data.The in-depth interviews were audiotaped, and responses transcribed for analysis through coding, followed by generation of themes and sub-themes, supported with direct quotes. Results: It emerged that there are no ethical and legal frameworks for ART practice in Ghana, and this adversely affects ART practice. Ethical challenges identified border on informed consent, clients' privacy and clinical data protection, gamete donation issues, multiple gestations, single parenting, and social and religious issues. The legal challenges identified include the non-existence of a legal regime for regulating ART practice and the absence of a professional body with clear-cut guidelines on ART practice. In the absence of legal and ethical frameworks in Ghana, practitioners intimated they do comply with internationally accepted principles and general ethics in medical practice. Conclusion: There are no regulations on ART in Ghana. Legal and ethical guidelines are essential to the provision of safe and successful ART practices to protect providers and users. Governmental efforts to regulate Ghana need to be prioritized. Funding: This study had no external funding support. It was funded privately from researchers' contributions.
Asunto(s)
Técnicas Reproductivas Asistidas , Humanos , Ghana , Técnicas Reproductivas Asistidas/ética , Técnicas Reproductivas Asistidas/legislación & jurisprudencia , Femenino , Consentimiento Informado/legislación & jurisprudencia , Consentimiento Informado/ética , Masculino , Entrevistas como Asunto , Embarazo , Infertilidad/terapia , Investigación CualitativaRESUMEN
This section considers the recent resurgence of regulatory interest in the field of assisted reproductive technology (ART) practices focusing on the new legislative framework in the Australian Capital Territory (ACT). It provides an overview of the Australian regulatory framework in this field and considers how the new legislation in the ACT sits alongside this framework. A detailed overview of the key provisions of the ACT legislation is provided, before considering whether the legislation goes far enough in addressing some of the more controversial issues in the field of ART.
Asunto(s)
Técnicas Reproductivas Asistidas , Técnicas Reproductivas Asistidas/legislación & jurisprudencia , Humanos , Australia , Regulación GubernamentalRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To investigate the abortion views and reproductive concerns of current in vitro fertilization patients after the US Supreme Court Dobbs v. Jackson decision, which overturned the Roe v. Wade decision guaranteeing abortion access. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional survey of English-speaking patients undergoing in vitro fertilization from January to November 2022 at a large academic institution in a state with restricted abortion care. Participants completed a 43-question electronic survey which measured feelings about abortion, future fertility treatments, and embryo disposition both quantitatively and qualitatively. RESULTS: Of 543 eligible patients, 267 (49%) consented to participate when called and were sent the survey. Of those, 180 (67%) completed it, resulting in a total completion rate of 33%. The majority believe abortion should be legal in the case of birth defects (90.8%) or rape or incest (90.3%). A significant proportion (91.4%) expressed concerns about abortion being illegal in the state that they receive infertility care. They reported some concern about making embryos (89.6%), controlling what happens to them (95.4%), and discarding them (94.4%). Patients wrote about their concerns with pursuing fertility treatments, fear of not having access to needed medical care, and the desire to remain close to states with less restrictive abortion laws. CONCLUSIONS: The evolving political landscape surrounding access to reproductive care has created significant concerns regarding legal regulation of these treatments and the disposition of embryos. By understanding patients' concerns, health care providers can more effectively advocate for the protection of fertility treatments and patients' autonomy in embryo disposition.
Asunto(s)
Aborto Inducido , Fertilización In Vitro , Humanos , Femenino , Adulto , Fertilización In Vitro/psicología , Fertilización In Vitro/legislación & jurisprudencia , Embarazo , Aborto Inducido/legislación & jurisprudencia , Aborto Inducido/psicología , Estados Unidos , Estudios Transversales , Destinación del Embrión/psicología , Técnicas Reproductivas Asistidas/psicología , Técnicas Reproductivas Asistidas/legislación & jurisprudencia , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Infertilidad/terapia , Infertilidad/psicología , MasculinoRESUMEN
Assisted reproductive technology (ART) has emerged in recent years as a point of significant innovation in the medical field but is also controversial from a bioethical and legal standpoint. In the Italian context, this matter is regulated by Law 40/2004, which specifically requires that informed consent should be obtained from both members of a couple before proceeding with any ART procedure. This consent is deemed irrevocable at the moment of egg fertilization. Recently, a ruling by the Italian Constitutional Court on this matter elicited controversy. The decision permitted embryo transfer even in a case of parental separation, notwithstanding the father's explicit opposition. The Court emphasized the priority of the woman's psychophysical health over the man's, highlighting the traumatic consequences of interrupting the undertaken path. As a result, both the man's right to self-determination regarding the decision to become a father and the need for informed consent at every stage of medical procedures have been downplayed. Moreover, the extensive utilization of procedures like embryo cryopreservation, with associated parental implications, particularly concerning the time frame and the actuality of informed consent, is posing challenges to the initial application framework of Law 40/2004. The objective of this Commentary is to scrutinize and discuss the issues mentioned above.
Asunto(s)
Padre , Consentimiento Informado , Técnicas Reproductivas Asistidas , Humanos , Italia , Femenino , Padre/legislación & jurisprudencia , Técnicas Reproductivas Asistidas/legislación & jurisprudencia , Masculino , Consentimiento Informado/legislación & jurisprudencia , Madres/psicología , Transferencia de EmbriónRESUMEN
Fertility decline is a complex phenomenon resulting from converging social and cultural changes that are governed through politics. As it has been discussed in many studies, the European's low fertility rate goes hand in hand with the trend of maternity postponement. Although in many European countries over the last decades reproduction is envisaged as an individual choice that can be made at older ages, having a child after a certain age can be impossible -either "naturally" or using assisted reproductive technology-depending on the medical and legislative possibilities and limits of the country in which people live. In the extremely diverse European reproscape, reproductive legislations have forced but also allowed many people to seek reproductive treatments outside their home countries. Spain is a leading destination in Europe for cross border reproductive travel and, of the foreigners it receives, the French are the largest group. Despite having a history of strong pro-natalist policies, France has been one of the strictest European countries regarding access to medically assisted procreation. Until 2022, only heterosexual couples in which women were under 43 years of age could access treatments. Despite the recent opening of access to "all women", including single women and same-sex female couples, women over 43 years of age were once again excluded from the new legal framework and therefore remain condemned to travel abroad to access reproductive treatments. In this article, we analyze the experience of French women over 40 who cross the Spanish border to access reproductive treatments in order to fulfill their desire to have children. Through ethnographic data emerging from six years of participant observation and in-depth interviews with 15 women, we explore why they remain excluded from the French system of reproductive governance and the obstacles they face during their reproductive journey.
Asunto(s)
Técnicas Reproductivas Asistidas , Humanos , Técnicas Reproductivas Asistidas/estadística & datos numéricos , Técnicas Reproductivas Asistidas/legislación & jurisprudencia , Técnicas Reproductivas Asistidas/tendencias , Femenino , España , Adulto , Francia , Turismo Médico/tendencias , Persona de Mediana Edad , Investigación CualitativaRESUMEN
The desire for parenthood among infertile individuals is often fulfilled by resorting to the ever-evolving Assisted Reproductive Techniques (ART). Since the birth of Durga, India's first baby born using ART in 1981, the lucrative fertility industry has grown exponentially in our country. The Government of India passed the Assisted Reproductive Technology (Regulatory) Act in 2021 to provide regulatory support to these services. The legislation offers clarity on various aspects of ART, including measures to safeguard children born through these procedures. The effective implementation of the ART Act is crucial to ensure that ART services become affordable, ethical, and socially acceptable in India. This article aims to discuss the controversies with ART services and issues that could compromise the wellbeing of children, while highlighting the provisions provided under the Act to address these.
Asunto(s)
Técnicas Reproductivas Asistidas , Humanos , Técnicas Reproductivas Asistidas/legislación & jurisprudencia , India , Femenino , Embarazo , NiñoRESUMEN
Abstract: The law (No.40/2004) stipulates that consent to Medically Assisted Procreation (MAP) remains irrevocable post ovum fertilization. Cryo-preservation introduces complexities, enabling embryo implantation requests after a couple's separation and the dissolution of the original parenthood plan. Constitutional Court Ruling No.161 in 2023 affirmed that the prohibition of revoking consent to MAP aligns with the Italian Constitution and the jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights. This delicate equilibrium of conflicting interests upholds human freedom, allowing consent revocation prior to ovocyte fertilization. Permitting revocation until implantation could inflict more significant harm: the infertile woman can in fact miss the opportunity to become a mother, impacting her psychophysical well-being and freedom of self-determination. Moreover, the embryo loses the chance to live, remaining in cryopreservation, which violates its dignity. Addressing this issue requires thorough communication by medical profession-als to inform couples about the limitations on consent revocation. An element of objectivity in terms of standards and evidence-based guidelines, from which norms must originate, is of utmost importance. Relying on broadly shared rules, especially at the international level, is vital in light of the unremitting scientific advances in MAP, as in other areas of medicine, which will open up new opportunities for which current legal/regulatory frameworks are inadequate.
Asunto(s)
Técnicas Reproductivas Asistidas , Humanos , Técnicas Reproductivas Asistidas/legislación & jurisprudencia , Técnicas Reproductivas Asistidas/ética , Italia , Femenino , Masculino , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/legislación & jurisprudencia , Criopreservación , Consentimiento Paterno/legislación & jurisprudencia , Consentimiento Informado/legislación & jurisprudenciaRESUMEN
This comprehensive review examines the multifaceted landscape of surrogacy, a revolutionary treatment for infertility. The study examines historical origins, shifting trends, medical considerations, psychological implications, legal complexities, international variations, and ethical dilemmas surrounding surrogacy. With the advent of assisted reproductive technology, gestational surrogacy allows intended parents a genetic connection to their child. Medical facets encompass indications for gestational surrogacy, drawing attention to maternal health risks and infertility factors. Evidence indicates that medical outcomes are comparable to conventional pregnancies, suggesting a viable reproductive solution for intended parents. Due to the complex nature of surrogacy psychological and emotional vulnerability is inevitable; yet studies underscore positive psychological well-being and satisfaction among gestational carriers (GCs), intended parents (IPs) and children. Surrogacy also has many religious dimensions, as each religion has its own perspective on the distinctive process of creating life and its outcomes, such as, the determination of the child's mother according to their beliefs. Legal considerations emerge as a fundamental aspect, with differing regulations globally. The review emphasizes the significance of comprehensive agreements to safeguard the rights and responsibilities of surrogates and IPs. The unique surrogacy laws in Israel serve as a noteworthy example, reflecting a progressive approach that provides a promising template to establish crucial international guidelines on surrogacy. The absence of international consensus necessitates attention from the global community to address key concerns, including the well-being of GCs, legal recognition for IPs, and the child's best interests, with the goal of establishing a universal standard of care in the field.
Asunto(s)
Técnicas Reproductivas Asistidas , Madres Sustitutas , Humanos , Madres Sustitutas/legislación & jurisprudencia , Femenino , Embarazo , Técnicas Reproductivas Asistidas/ética , Técnicas Reproductivas Asistidas/legislación & jurisprudencia , Infertilidad/terapia , Padres/psicología , IsraelRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this narrative review paper was to review the state and development of the field of donor gametes in Kazakhstan, compare its legislative and technical capabilities with other countries and identify key steps towards the establishment of a unified register of donor gametes in the Republic. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The narrative review paper conducted an analysis of scientific publications and legal documents to examine the implementation of Assisted Reproductive Technologies (ART), focusing on Donor Sexual Gametes (DSG), globally. It utilized medical publications from 2019 to 2023, legal acts, and recommendations from global health organizations to analyze eligibility criteria, legal regulations, and the social aspects of ART across different regions. RESULTS: In Kazakhstan, ART is regulated by legislation, with DSG procedures governed by age limits, medical screening, and restrictions on the number of children born from donated gametes. Worldwide, practices vary, but there is growing interest in establishing a unified register of reproductive donor material to enhance transparency and accountability. However, legal gaps and ethical considerations must be addressed. CONCLUSION: The study identifies gaps in Kazakhstan's legislation compared to Western countries, emphasizing the necessity for enhanced legal rights for donors and recipients, including options for anonymity. Ethical concerns highlight the importance of confidentiality and data security in accessing the donor registry. Overall, implementing such a register promises to enhance transparency, safety, and accountability in reproductive medicine.
Asunto(s)
Sistema de Registros , Técnicas Reproductivas Asistidas , Donantes de Tejidos , Kazajstán , Humanos , Técnicas Reproductivas Asistidas/legislación & jurisprudencia , Donantes de Tejidos/legislación & jurisprudencia , Masculino , Femenino , Células GerminativasRESUMEN
This comprehensive review delves into the moral and ethical dilemmas surrounding post-mortem sperm retrieval (PMSR) and its implications for creating new individuals. The paper examines the challenges posed by unusual requests for sperm retrieval from the deceased's widow and parents, as well as the broader socio-ethical considerations associated with PMSR. These requests have often been denied due to the absence of established laws and guidelines governing posthumous sperm retrieval and subsequent births, which were once deemed impossible. While some countries have implemented institutional policies to regulate its use to some extent, there remains a lack of standardized rules and procedures for the collection and retrieval of sperm after death. It is essential to introduce institutional guidelines to facilitate requests for assisted reproductive technology (ART) following successful sperm retrieval. Additionally, the development of PMSR legislation is necessary to ensure a proper balance between the moral rights and fundamental rights of the deceased, their family, and any current or future offspring, while providing adequate protection for all parties involved.
Asunto(s)
Recuperación de la Esperma , Humanos , Masculino , Recuperación de la Esperma/ética , Recuperación de la Esperma/legislación & jurisprudencia , Concepción Póstuma/ética , Concepción Póstuma/legislación & jurisprudencia , Técnicas Reproductivas Asistidas/ética , Técnicas Reproductivas Asistidas/legislación & jurisprudenciaAsunto(s)
Aborto Inducido , Estructuras Embrionarias , Atención al Paciente , Salud Reproductiva , Técnicas Reproductivas Asistidas , Salud de la Mujer , Humanos , Alabama , Activismo Político , Estados Unidos , Aborto Legal/legislación & jurisprudencia , Aborto Inducido/legislación & jurisprudencia , Atención al Paciente/normas , Salud de la Mujer/legislación & jurisprudencia , Salud de la Mujer/normas , Salud Reproductiva/legislación & jurisprudencia , Salud Reproductiva/normas , Técnicas Reproductivas Asistidas/legislación & jurisprudenciaRESUMEN
The practice of surrogacy is frequently the subject of media, scientific, social, regulatory and policy attention. Although it is, for many, an accepted form of assisted reproduction for those who would otherwise not be able to have children, surrogacy often generates strong feeling, particularly where there is any possibility of exploitation. Therefore, there is disagreement about how it should be regulated. In some countries, surrogacy is prohibited in any form, although this does not stop people using it. In others, it is unregulated but still practised. In some nations it is regulated in either a 'commercial' or an 'altruistic' model. This review article considers the possible regulatory future of surrogacy, initially from a UK perspective considering a recent review of the legal framework in a country where surrogacy works well (although some cross borders to access it), and then through an assessment of global trends and other national perspectives. It concludes that the international regulation of surrogacy, although potentially desirable, is unlikely. This being the case, it would be preferable for individual nations to regulate surrogacy so it can be undertaken in ways that are safe, ethical and protective of the best interests of children, surrogates, intended parents and families.
Asunto(s)
Técnicas Reproductivas Asistidas , Madres Sustitutas , Madres Sustitutas/legislación & jurisprudencia , Humanos , Femenino , Embarazo , Técnicas Reproductivas Asistidas/tendencias , Técnicas Reproductivas Asistidas/legislación & jurisprudencia , Reino UnidoAsunto(s)
Aborto Inducido , Técnicas Reproductivas Asistidas , Decisiones de la Corte Suprema , Aborto Inducido/legislación & jurisprudencia , Aborto Legal/legislación & jurisprudencia , Femenino , Humanos , Jurisprudencia , Embarazo , Técnicas Reproductivas Asistidas/legislación & jurisprudencia , Estados UnidosAsunto(s)
Enfermedades Mitocondriales/prevención & control , Terapia de Reemplazo Mitocondrial/ética , Técnicas Reproductivas Asistidas/ética , Femenino , Humanos , Terapia de Reemplazo Mitocondrial/legislación & jurisprudencia , Embarazo , Técnicas Reproductivas Asistidas/legislación & jurisprudenciaRESUMEN
Uterus transplantation (UTx) is fast evolving from an experimental to a clinical procedure, combining solid organ transplantation with assisted reproductive technology. The commencement of the first human uterus transplant trial in the United Kingdom leads us to examine and reflect upon the legal and regulatory aspects closely intertwined with UTx from the process of donation to potential implications for fertility treatment and the birth of the resultant child. As the world's first ephemeral transplant, the possibility of organ restitution requires consideration and is discussed herein. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Uterine transplantation warrants a closer look at the legal frameworks on fertility treatment and transplantation in England.
Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Órganos/legislación & jurisprudencia , Útero/trasplante , Inglaterra , Femenino , Humanos , Histerectomía/legislación & jurisprudencia , Histerectomía/psicología , Técnicas Reproductivas Asistidas/legislación & jurisprudencia , Obtención de Tejidos y Órganos/legislación & jurisprudenciaAsunto(s)
Enfermedades Mitocondriales/prevención & control , Terapia de Reemplazo Mitocondrial/ética , Terapia de Reemplazo Mitocondrial/legislación & jurisprudencia , Técnicas Reproductivas Asistidas/ética , Técnicas Reproductivas Asistidas/legislación & jurisprudencia , Australia , Femenino , Humanos , Enfermedades Mitocondriales/genética , Terapia de Reemplazo Mitocondrial/métodos , EmbarazoRESUMEN
O Conselho Federal de Medicina acaba de editar a Resolução nº 2.294/2021, publicada em 15 de junho de 2021, que aponta normas para a utilização das técnicas de reprodução assistida. Apesar de o propósito ser o aperfeiçoamento das práticas e a observância aos princípios éticos e bioéticos para trazer maior segurança e eficácia a tratamentos e procedimentos médicos, repete inconstitucionalidades das normatizações pretéritas e impõe mais restrições ao sonho das pessoas de ter filhos. Desse modo, mais do que avanços, o novo regramento provoca um retrocesso que não se coaduna com a garantia constitucional e legal que assegura o livre planejamento familiar.(AU)
The Brazilian Federal Council of Medicine has just edited the Resolution nº 2.294/2021, published on June 15, 2021, which sets out rules for the use of assisted reproduction techniques. Although the purpose is to improve practices and observe ethical and bioethical principles to bring greater safety and efficacy to medical treatments and procedures, it repeats the unconstitutionalities of past regulations and imposes more restrictions on people's dreams of having children. In this way, more than advances, the new regulation provokes a setback that is not consistent with the constitutional and legal guarantees of free family planning.(AU)