Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 12 de 12
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
2.
Urol Nurs ; 16(3): 86-8, 1996 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9295798

RESUMEN

Postoperative pain in 33 patients who underwent radical prostatectomy was managed by an intramuscular nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug protocol rather than by administration of narcotics. Patients rated their perception of pain with a visual analog scale on the first postoperative day both before and after receiving ketorolac tromethamine. The medication was effective in relieving pain after this major operation. Costs were approximately one half that of the traditional narcotic protocol used before this study.


Asunto(s)
Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/uso terapéutico , Dolor Postoperatorio/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Anciano , Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/economía , Costos de los Medicamentos , Humanos , Ketorolaco Trometamina , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dimensión del Dolor , Dolor Postoperatorio/etiología , Estudios Prospectivos , Prostatectomía/efectos adversos , Tolmetina/análogos & derivados , Tolmetina/economía , Tolmetina/uso terapéutico , Trometamina/análogos & derivados , Trometamina/economía , Trometamina/uso terapéutico
3.
J Pediatr ; 129(2): 292-6, 1996 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8765630

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To determine the incidence of side effects with the short-term use of intravenously administered ketorolac in children and the overall cost savings with a unit dosing system. STUDY DESIGN: We prospectively examined the incidence of complications arising from the intravenous administration of ketorolac to 1747 children (14,810 doses) during a 3-year, 3-month period and assessed cost savings resulting from dividing 60 mg syringes into 7.5, 15, 30, and 60 mg unit doses. Complications were recorded prospectively into a computerized database. Estimated drug costs to the pharmacy were calculated on the basis of the total numbers of each drug fraction administered, with allowance for 1O% wastage as a result of drug expiration. RESULTS: Side effects occurring with ketorolac administration were rare. Four patients (0.2%) had hypersensitivity reactions to the drug, two of them possibly on the basis of latex allergy. Two patients (O.1%) had renal complications but were subsequently found to have underlying causes that could account for their renal symptoms. One patient (0.05%) had massive gastrointestinal bleeding in the postoperative period. With fractionation of 60 mg syringes, total drug cost to the pharmacy was $34,786, rather than the $86,639 that would have been spent had a single syringe been used for each dose. CONCLUSION: Ketorolac proved safe for short-term intravenous use in children more than 1 year of age when patients with known contraindications to the use of non-steroidal antiinflammatory drugs were excluded. A considerable reduction in drug costs can be achieved with fractionation of premixed syringes into unit doses.


Asunto(s)
Analgésicos no Narcóticos/uso terapéutico , Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/uso terapéutico , Tolmetina/análogos & derivados , Adolescente , Analgésicos no Narcóticos/administración & dosificación , Analgésicos no Narcóticos/efectos adversos , Analgésicos no Narcóticos/economía , Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/administración & dosificación , Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/efectos adversos , Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/economía , Niño , Preescolar , Ahorro de Costo , Costos de los Medicamentos , Hipersensibilidad a las Drogas/etiología , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/inducido químicamente , Humanos , Hipersensibilidad/etiología , Incidencia , Lactante , Sistemas de Información , Inyecciones Intravenosas , Ketorolaco , Enfermedades Renales/etiología , Látex/efectos adversos , Sistemas de Medicación/economía , Servicio de Farmacia en Hospital/economía , Hemorragia Posoperatoria/inducido químicamente , Estudios Prospectivos , Seguridad , Jeringas , Tolmetina/administración & dosificación , Tolmetina/efectos adversos , Tolmetina/economía , Tolmetina/uso terapéutico
4.
Clin Ther ; 18(1): 197-211, 1996.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8851463

RESUMEN

This retrospective cohort study aimed to determine the resource utilization and cost consequences of ketorolac tromethamine in postoperative pain management in a variety of clinical circumstances. All patients were treated at LDS Hospital, Salt Lake City, Utah, a 520-bed teaching hospital. A long-term archive of clinical and financial data from a computerized hospital information system was searched for patients with specified primary International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification discharge diagnoses treated from June 1, 1990, to July 1, 1992, who received ketorolac (n = 229). These patients were matched with cohort patients (n = 821) treated from July 1, 1989, to May 31, 1990, who did not receive ketorolac. The archive contained information on ketorolac exposure as well as concurrent drug therapy and adverse drug events that had been prospectively evaluated during hospitalization throughout the study and cohort periods. Detailed costs were available for each patient. The study examined attributable differences in lengths of stay and total costs using linear regression modeling. We found a statistically significant attributable decreased length of stay for ketorolac patients of 1.15 days. Case patients also had reduced usage of narcotic drugs (4.39 fewer doses than cohorts and 15.6 hours shorter duration of narcotics than cohorts), reduced use of antiemetic and antipruritic medications, and reduced numbers of adverse events. Linear regression modeling showed that ketorolac use was significantly related to reduced cost using inflation-adjusted dollars. We believe that ketorolac has significant cost advantages over opiate analgesics because of its narcotic-sparing effects. Advantages of ketorolac use include reduced rates of adverse drug events, reduced lengths of stay, especially for orthopedic surgery, and reduced overall hospital costs for diagnosis-related groups associated with cholecystectomy.


Asunto(s)
Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/economía , Hospitales Universitarios , Dolor Postoperatorio/economía , Tolmetina/análogos & derivados , Trometamina/análogos & derivados , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/uso terapéutico , Costos y Análisis de Costo , Utilización de Medicamentos , Femenino , Humanos , Ketorolaco Trometamina , Modelos Lineales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Narcóticos/economía , Narcóticos/uso terapéutico , Dolor Postoperatorio/tratamiento farmacológico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tolmetina/economía , Tolmetina/uso terapéutico , Trometamina/economía , Trometamina/uso terapéutico , Utah
5.
J Spinal Disord ; 8(3): 206-12, 1995 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-7670211

RESUMEN

The use of ketorolac was studied in patients undergoing lumbar laminectomy and those receiving lumbar fusion with or without instrumentation. Laminectomy patients in the ketorolac group used significantly less narcotic analgesic than did those in the narcotic treatment group. Ketorolac patients in both surgical categories experienced better pain control than narcotic group patients did. Laminectomy ketorolac patients experienced less sedation than did those in the narcotic group, and a similar trend was noted for fusion patients. A significant improvement in postoperative ambulation was demonstrated in the fusion ketorolac group. Postoperative total drug costs were significantly greater in both ketorolac treatment groups. A one-half day decrease in hospitalization was noted for laminectomy ketorolac patients. The overall annual financial impact of the use of ketorolac in lumbar spine patients is a net savings of $211,095.


Asunto(s)
Analgésicos no Narcóticos/uso terapéutico , Hospitalización/economía , Vértebras Lumbares/cirugía , Tolmetina/análogos & derivados , Adulto , Analgésicos no Narcóticos/economía , Analgésicos Opioides/economía , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapéutico , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Costos de los Medicamentos , Femenino , Humanos , Ketorolaco , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dolor/tratamiento farmacológico , Factores de Tiempo , Tolmetina/economía , Tolmetina/uso terapéutico
6.
Am Fam Physician ; 49(5): 1197-202, 1994 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8154406

RESUMEN

Development of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) with a goal of improved efficacy and lower toxicity has continued, resulting in the introduction of etodolac, ketorolac, nabumetone and oxaprozin on the market. Each of these agents appears to be as effective as other commonly used NSAIDs in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis or osteoarthritis. Studies of nabumetone and etodolac show a lower incidence of serious gastrointestinal toxicity with both drugs, but additional large clinical trials are necessary to confirm these findings. Although ketorolac, which is now available in oral form, is an effective analgesic, its long-term use is limited by a high incidence of gastrointestinal toxicity. Oxaprozin is an effective, long-acting anti-inflammatory analgesic, but its comparative advantages remain undefined.


Asunto(s)
Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos , Butanonas , Etodolaco , Propionatos , Tolmetina/análogos & derivados , Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/clasificación , Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/economía , Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/farmacología , Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/uso terapéutico , Artritis Reumatoide/tratamiento farmacológico , Butanonas/economía , Butanonas/farmacología , Butanonas/uso terapéutico , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto , Costos de los Medicamentos , Etodolaco/economía , Etodolaco/farmacología , Etodolaco/uso terapéutico , Enfermedades Gastrointestinales/inducido químicamente , Enfermedades Gastrointestinales/epidemiología , Humanos , Incidencia , Ketorolaco , Nabumetona , Osteoartritis/tratamiento farmacológico , Oxaprozina , Propionatos/economía , Propionatos/farmacología , Propionatos/uso terapéutico , Tolmetina/economía , Tolmetina/farmacología , Tolmetina/uso terapéutico
8.
Clin Ther ; 15(5): 938-48, 1993.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8269460

RESUMEN

The medical records for 174 patients who underwent cholecystectomy (n = 52) or hip/knee replacement (n = 122) at four community-based medical centers were retrospectively reviewed to determine if using a nonnarcotic alternative to morphine sulfate and/or meperidine as a primary postoperative analgesic could reduce resource costs per patient. Two cohorts were constructed: 87 patients received either morphine sulfate or meperidine as the primary postoperative analgesic, and 87 patients received ketorolac. Ketorolac patients undergoing cholecystectomy were associated with lower per case costs in inpatient care (length of stay), direct nursing labor, PRN (as required) procedures, and medications relating to emesis and to gastrointestinal distress. Higher per case costs were recorded for the primary analgesic (study drug) and for supplemental pain medications. In contrast to substantial differences in the acquisition cost of ketorolac versus morphine sulfate/meperidine, the ketorolac cholecystectomy group was associated with lower overall resource costs per patient. In joint replacement procedures, however, the ketorolac group was associated with higher overall resource costs per patient, attributable primarily to a slightly higher postoperative length of stay.


Asunto(s)
Analgésicos/economía , Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/economía , Recursos en Salud/economía , Meperidina/uso terapéutico , Morfina/uso terapéutico , Dolor Postoperatorio/tratamiento farmacológico , Tolmetina/análogos & derivados , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Analgésicos/uso terapéutico , Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/uso terapéutico , Colecistectomía , Prótesis de Cadera , Humanos , Ketorolaco , Prótesis de la Rodilla , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tolmetina/economía , Tolmetina/uso terapéutico
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA