[Endoscopic inanimate biological simulators for training in endoscopic mucosal dissection]. / Entrenamiento en la disección endoscópica de la submucosa "mediante el uso de simuladores biológicos inanimados.

BACKGROUND: Simulators have been used as a training method; they allow training, skill development, standardization of techniques and the performance of a greater number of risk-free procedures. Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is the standard treatment for early gastric cancer since it allows en bloc resection of larger lesions however requires longer procedure time and has more complications than endoscopic mucosal resection. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the use of biological inanimate simulators in endoscopic training for the development of skills required for ESD. METHODS: Experimental design using a biological inanimate simulator to evaluate the development of endoscopic skills. Five trained endoscopists with knowledge of the ESD technique, but without previous experience were selected. Technical success, complication rate and procedure time were evaluated. Each participant performed a self-evaluation. RESULTS: 18 lesions of 10-20 mm in diameter were dissected, with a mean area of 2.64 ± 2 cm2 and a mean procedure time of 21.08 ± 14.01 minutes (5.48 - 48.61). Self-evaluation and instructor's evaluation showed a strong positive correlation. There was no correlation between lesion size and procedure time. There was one perforation (5.8%), which was successfully managed with one endoclip. Complications such as bleeding could not be assed. CONCLUSIONS: The use of inanimate biological simulators allows training in complex endoscopic procedures such as ESD with a wide safety margin. Lesion size did not correlate with procedure time. It is necessary to increase the number of procedures to improve the learning curve. This simulator does not allow evaluation of complications other than perforations.

Dilated intercellular spaces in subtypes of gastroesophagic reflux disease.

BACKGROUND: Dilatation of the intercellular spaces by electron microscopy has been considered as an early morphological marker of tissue injury in gastroesophageal reflux disease. The degree of dilatation in Barret's esophagus in currently unknown. OBJECTIVES: To determine the frequency of dilated intervellular spaces in Barrett's esophagus. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Cross-sectional and prospective analysis of consecutive patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease. We selected symptomatic patients > 18 years and both sexes. Patients with recent PPI use (< 14 days), H-2 antagonists, NSAID's or previous upper GI tract surgery were excluded. VARIABLES INCLUDED: Clinical-demographic data, Carlsson-Dent score, conventional endoscopy findings, pH-metry results (in non-erosive) and normal mucosal biopsies at 2 and 5 cm above the squamocolumnar junction. Dilation of intercellular spaces was measured by electron microscopy. STATISTICS: Chi square test with a significance level 0.05 was calculated. The following four groups were compared: a) non-erosive reflux disease (n = 14); b) erosive esophagitis (n = 5); c) Barrett's esophagus (n = 13); and d) healthy controls (n = 5). RESULTS: the dilation of intervellular spaces was increasingly greater form non-erosive revlux to Barrett's esophagus and higher in biopsies taken at 5 cm than at 2 cm of the squamous columnar junction (2.72 +/- 1.35 vs. 1.71 +/- 0.48 microg) (p = 0.001). There was no difference between biopsies at 2 and 5 cm in the order groups. CONCLUSION: dilation of intercellular spaces was greater in Barrett s esophagus than in the other groups and higher at 5 cm from the squamocolumnar junction.