Task dependent changes in mechanical and biomechanical measures result from manipulating stiffness settings in a prosthetic foot.

BACKGROUND: Adaptation of lower limb function to different gait tasks is inherently not as effective among individuals with lower limb amputation as compared to able-bodied individuals. Varying stiffness of a prosthetic foot may be a way of facilitating gait tasks that require larger ankle joint range of motion. METHODS: Three stiffness settings of a novel prosthetic foot design were tested for level walking at three speeds as well as for 7,5° incline and decline walking. Outcome measures, describing ankle range of motion and ankle dynamic joint stiffness were contrasted across the three stiffness settings. Standardized mechanical tests were done for the hindfoot and forefoot. FINDINGS: Dorsiflexion angle was incrementally increased with a softer foot and a faster walking speed / higher degree of slope. The concurrent dynamic joint stiffness exhibited a less systematic change, especially during INCLINE and DECLINE walking. The small difference seen between the stiffness settings for hindfoot loading limits analysis for the effects of stiffness during weight acceptance, however, a stiffer foot significantly restricted plantarflexion during DECLINE. INTERPRETATIONS: Varying stiffness settings within a prosthetic foot does have an effect on prosthetic foot dynamics, and differences are task dependent, specifically in parameters involving kinetic attributes. When considering the need for increased ankle range of motion while performing more demanding gait tasks, a foot that allows the users themselves to adjust stiffness according to the task at hand may be of benefit for active individuals, possibly enhancing the user's satisfaction and comfort during various daily activities.

Speed Adaptable Prosthetic Foot: Concept Description, Prototyping and Initial User Testing.

This article presents a novel design of a prosthetic foot that features adaptable stiffness that changes according to the speed of ankle motion. The motivation is the natural graduation in stiffness of a biological ankle over a range of ambulation tasks. The device stiffness depends on rate of movement, ranging from a dissipating support at very slow walking speed, to efficient energy storage and return at normal walking speed. The objective here is to design a prosthetic foot that provides a compliant support for slow ambulation, without sacrificing the spring-like energy return beneficial in normal walking. The design is a modification of a commercially available foot and employs material properties to provide a change in stiffness. The velocity dependent properties of a non-Newtonian working fluid provide the rate adaptability. Material properties of components allow for a geometry shift that results in a coupling action, affecting the stiffness of the overall system. The function of an adaptive coupling was tested in linear motion. A prototype prosthetic foot was built, and the speed dependent stiffness measured mechanically. Furthermore, the prototype was tested by a user and body kinematics measured in gait analysis for varying walking speed, comparing the prototype to the original foot model (non-modified). Mechanical evaluation of stiffness shows increase in stiffness of about 60% over the test range and 10% increase between slow and normal walking speed in user testing.

Assessing the Involvement of Users During Development of Lower Limb Wearable Robotic Exoskeletons: A Survey Study.

OBJECTIVE: To explore user-centered design methods currently implemented during development of lower limb wearable robots and how they are utilized during different stages of product development. BACKGROUND: Currently, there appears to be a lack of standardized frameworks for evaluation methods and design requirements to implement effective user-centered design for safe and effective clinical or ergonomic system application. METHOD: Responses from a total of 191 experts working in the field of lower limb exoskeletons were analyzed in this exploratory survey. Descriptive statistics were used to present responses and measures of frequency, and chi-square tests were used to contrast the answers of respondents who identified as clinicians versus engineers. RESULTS: A vast majority of respondents involve users in their development, in particular at the initial and iterative stages, although some differences were found between disciplines. A variety of methods and metrics are used to capture feedback from users and test devices, and although valuable, some methods used may not be based on validated measures. Guidelines regarding tests on safety of exoskeletons also lack standardization. CONCLUSION: There seems to be a consensus among experts regarding the importance of a user-centered approach in exoskeleton development; however, standardized frameworks with regard to appropriate testing methods and design approaches are lacking. Such frameworks should consider an interdisciplinary focus on the needs and safety of the intended user during each iteration of the process. APPLICATION: This exploratory study provides an overview of current practice among engineers and clinicians regarding the user-centered design of exoskeletons. Limitations and recommendations for future directions are identified.