Potential drug-drug interactions with psychotropic drugs in paediatric inpatients: A cross-sectional study.

AIMS: Polypharmacy and drug-drug interactions (DDIs) are important problems that necessitate more attention in paediatric inpatients. This study aimed to determine and evaluate DDIs in paediatric inpatients using psychotropic drugs. METHODS: It was conducted as a retrospective cross-sectional study. Inpatients consulted by child and adolescent psychiatrists (CAPs) and had at least one psychotropic drug-using between January 2016 and September 2017 were retrospectively included. To determine the clinical significance of DDIs by Micromedex® and DDI Predictor online databases. DDIs between psychotropic and other drugs, the type, severity, and duration of potential DDIs were evaluated. RESULTS: During the study period, 564 patients' records were reviewed and 200 patients were considered eligible and included in the study. The median (min-max) age was 13.70 (1.5-17.83) years. The mean (SD) number of psychotropics used during hospitalisation was 1.29 (0.55) and the total number of drugs was 7.39 (4.45). A total of 336 potential DDIs were detected (2.19 DDIs/patient) in all patients. The most common potential outcome of psychotropic DDIs was drug-induced QTc prolongation (67.56%). While 92.85% of the potential DDIs were "contraindicated" or "major," only 18.46% had a "good" or "excellent" strength of evidence. The risk of psychotropic polypharmacy (OR:0.73, 95% CI 0.59-0.92; p:0.006) and DDIs (OR:0.69, 95% CI 0.35-0.76; p:0.033) was significantly higher in patients without primary psychiatric disorders. When the total number of drugs and the total number of potential DDIs were compared amongst all inpatient units, significant differences were found between paediatric hematology-general paediatrics (mean difference: 2.002; P < .001) and paediatric hematology-paediatric ICU (mean difference: 1.650; P = .012), respectively. CONCLUSION: Psychotropic drug-related DDI is a major problem in the paediatric population and the clinical significance of the potential DDIs' risk should be determined in patient-centred care and managed by the multidisciplinary team.

Clinical features and subjective/physiological responses to emotional stimuli in the presence of emotion dysregulation in attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder.

INTRODUCTION: Emotion dysregulation (ED) has long been recognized in clinical descriptions of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), but a renewed interest in ED has advanced research on the overlap between the two entities. Autonomic reactivity (AR) is a neurobiological correlate of emotion regulation; however, the association between ADHD and AR remains unclear. Our aim was to explore the clinical differences, AR, and subjective emotional responses to visual emotional stimuli in ADHD children with and without ED. METHOD: School-aged ADHD children with (n = 28) and without (n = 20) ED, according to the definition of deficiency in emotional self-regulation (DESR), and healthy controls (n = 22) were interviewed by using the Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School Aged Children-Present and Lifetime version (K-SADS-PL) to screen frequent psychopathologies for these ages. All subjects were evaluated with Child Behavior Checklist 6-18 (CBCL), the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ), the McMaster Family Assessment Device (FAD), the School-Age Temperament Inventory (SATI), and Conners' Parent Rating Scale (CPRS-48), which were completed by parents. To evaluate emotional responses, the International Affective Picture System (IAPS) and the subjective and physiological responses (electrodermal activity and heart rate reactivity) to selected pictures were examined. RESULTS: Regarding clinically distinctive features, the ADHD+ED group differed from the ADHD-ED and the control groups in terms of having higher temperamental negative reactivity, more oppositional/conduct problems, and lower prosocial behaviors. In the AR measures, children in the ADHD+ED group rated unpleasant stimuli as more negative, but they still had lower heart rate reactivity (HRR) than the ADHD-ED and control groups; moreover, unlike the two other groups, the ADHD+ED group showed no differences in HRR between different emotional stimuli. CONCLUSION: The presented findings are unique in terms of their ability to clinically and physiologically differentiate between ADHD children with and without ED.