Acute hepatitis B outbreak in a nursing home for the disabled in Türkiye.

Background: Although hepatitis B is vaccine-preventable, it remains a significant health problem. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first hepatitis B outbreak report from Türkiye. Aims: To investigate the cause of hepatitis B outbreak in a nursing home for the disabled and make recommendations for prevention. Methods: An outbreak of acute hepatitis B was declared in a nursing home for the disabled following the admission of 3 patients from the home in a hospital. Collaborative response was initiated with the Provincial Health Directorate through the Public Health Infectious Diseases Department. We began tracking the infection and monitoring active cases. Audits and controls were carried out to determine the source, establish protection and control measures, and prevent further transmission. Results: Six of the 65 nursing home residents were diagnosed with acute hepatitis B. Four of them had diabetes and their blood glucose levels were monitored for at least 12 months. Two of the patients had received dental treatment in the last 6 months. The frequency of both variables, which may be an indication of the transmission route, was statistically significantly greater in the acute hepatitis B group. All the patients who could be sequenced were identified as genotype D. While 3 patients recovered fully, 2 were diagnosed with chronic hepatitis B and one died due to fulminant hepatitis. Conclusion: Standard routine immunization should be implemented as a preventive measure for acute hepatitis B. Frequent supervision and training on hygiene practices and safety precautions should be conducted for care staff working in collective residential facilities.

Gastrointestinal PCR panel results and antibiotic use in acute gastroenteritis cases: How appropriate are we in our usage?

BACKGROUND: We aimed to determine the pathogens detected by the Gastrointestinal (GI) PCR panel in patients with acute gastroenteritis (AGE), the evaluation of antibiotic use in these patients, and the investigation of the role of laboratory parameters in differentiating viral and bacterial etiologies. METHODS: The demographic characteristics, GI PCR panel results, laboratory investigations, antibiotic usage, and appropriateness of antibiotic treatment were investigated in AGE patients. RESULTS: A total of 175 adult patients with AGE and GI PCR panel results were included in the study. The most common pathogens were EPEC (24.6%) and C. difficile (18.3%). Among the 102 patients receiving antibiotic treatment, 34.3% were evaluated as inappropriate antibiotic use. WBC, CRP, procalcitonin, CRP/albumin ratio, and procalcitonin/albumin ratio were found to be significantly higher in cases with bacterial origin. CONCLUSIONS: The utilization of GI PCR panels in AGE patients has revolutionized the field of diagnostics by providing rapid and accurate identification of pathogens. In units without the possibility of GI PCR testing, CRP, procalcitonin, CRP/albumin ratio and procalcitonin/albumin ratio may be useful in the decision of antibiotic treatment.

Cryptococcal meningitis in a non-HIV patient with solid organ transplantation.

Cryptococcal meningitis (CM) is often associated with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). Recently, this microorganism has been increasingly identified in HIV-negative patients. CM cases are encountered in HIV-negative individuals, especially secondary to liver disease, solid organ transplantation (SOT), tuberculosis, lymphoproliferative diseases with T-cell-mediated immunological disorders, long-term corticosteroid use, malignancies, diabetes mellitus, and sarcoidosis. Our patient is an HIV-negative, SOT case with CM. It should be considered that CM can also occur in HIV-negative patients. As in our case, patients receiving long-term immunosuppressive therapy should be evaluated for CM, and renal functions should be closely monitored during treatment. There is a need for more case reports on the subject, especially in CM detected HIV-negative patients, due to the different treatment protocols and challenging clinical conditions compared to HIV-positive cases.

The impact of Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) on urinalysis parameters.

BACKGROUND: Creatinine elevation and changes in urinalyse parameters may be seen due to acute kidney injury during COVID-19. In the present study, we aimed to investigate the changes in urinalysis of COVID-19 patients with normal kidney function. METHODS: The data of COVID-19 patients with normal renal functions were retrospectively analyzed. Urinalysis parameters of these patients were recorded. The patients were divided into three groups as mild, moderate and severe with respect to the clinical course of the disease. It was examined whether the urine analysis values in the groups were different from normal reference values and whether these values were different between the groups. In addition, possible relationship between the urinalysis parameters and the clinical severity of the disease was investigated. RESULTS: There are three groups; mild (N.=40), moderate (N.=38) and severe (N.=42). Mean age were significantly higher in the severe group, while gender distribution of the groups was similar (P=0.033, P=0.091) Creatinine values of all patients were normal. There were 6.7% glucose positivity, 13.4% protein positivity, 5.8% urobilinogen positivity and 7.5% ketone positivity in urine dipstick analysis and these changes were all significantly higher than the reference values (P=0.008, P<0.0001, P=0.016, P=0.016). Pyuria and hematuria were detected in 8.3% and 9.2%, respectively. The urinalysis parameters and urine microscopy findings were not affected by the severity of the disease. CONCLUSIONS: Glycosuria, proteinuria, pyuria and hematuria may occur during COVID-19 disease, regardless of comorbidity and renal dysfunction. However, these urine parameters were not correlated with the severity of the disease.

A Case of Acute Parotitis Associated with COVID-19.

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) emerged in China at the end of 2019 and spread worldwide. A sixty-three-year-old female patient was admitted to the hospital six days after she tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 with complaints of cough, shortness of breath, and myalgia. After seven days, both parotid gland sites developed swelling, tenderness, and pain. The ultrasonography revealed acute parotitis bilaterally. Viral serological tests were negative. Therefore, COVID-19 infection was considered the cause of acute parotitis. The patient was discharged after recovery. This case report emphasized that acute non-suppurative parotitis may develop due to COVID-19 infection as an atypical manifestation.

Comparison of Risk Factors and Outcomes in Carbapenem-Resistant and Carbapenem-Susceptible Gram-Negative Bacteremia.

BACKGROUND: Carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteremia (CR-GNB) is seen with increasing frequency and result in high mortality. The aim of this study was to compare the risk factors and results of carbapenem-resistant and carbapenem-susceptible Gram-negative bacteremia and to determine the factors related to mortality. METHODS: The study was conducted as a retrospective observational comparative case series between June 2016 and November 2017 in Sisli Hamidiye Etfal Training and Research Hospital. The patients were divided into two groups as carbapenem-susceptible and carbapenem-resistant according to antibiotic susceptibility data of blood cultures. The risk factors for the development of carbapenem resistance, length of hospital stay, mortality rates, and mortality related factors were investigated between these two groups. RESULTS: Two hundred and eleven cases were included in the study. Of these cases, 54 were resistant to carbapenem and 157 were susceptible to carbapenem. Mortality occurred in 60 (28.4%) patients. The 14 and 28 day mortality rates of patients with carbapenem resistance were significantly higher than those without carbapenem resistance. There was no statistically significant difference between two groups in length of stay in the hospital after bacteremia. Pittsburgh bacteremia score, cardiovascular disease, urinary catheterization, and inappropriate empirical antibiotic therapy were the most significant risk factors for mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Carbapenem resistance is associated with increased mortality and inappropriate empirical antibiotic treatment increases mortality. Therefore, patients should be evaluated for risk factors in predicting CR-GNB and treatment for resistant pathogens should be applied in appropriate patients.

Clinical effect of discordance in empirical treatment of cases with urinary tract infection accompanied by bacteremia.

OBJECTIVE: It has been shown in previous studies that inadequate empirical treatment is associated with mortality in a variety of infections caused by Gram-negative bacteria. In this study, the clinical effect of discordance in empirical treatment was investigated in patients with urinary tract infection (UTI) accompanied by bacteremia. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the files of adult (>18 years old) patients who were diagnosed with UTI in our clinic between January 2014 and December 2015. Cases in which the same causative microorganism grew in both blood and urine cultures were included in the study. Patients using ceftriaxone and carbapenem as empirical antibiotic therapy (EAT) were compared as two different groups. In cases that the ethiologic agents were extended- spectrum beta lactamase (ESBL)-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae and Escherichia coli isolates, if the microorganism was resistant to initial antibiotic treatment the situation was defined as EAT discordance, and if it was sensitive it was defined as EAT concordance. RESULTS: After the exclusion criteria were applied, 65 of the 266 cases examined were taken into the study. Clinical and laboratory features of cases of ceftriaxone and carbapenem groups were similar. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of hospital stay and survival (p>0.05). Of 28 cases of ESBL-producing E. coli and K. pneumoniae, 18 were EAT discordant and 10 were EAT concordant. Clinical and laboratory features of EAT concordant and EAT discordant groups were similar. No statistically significant difference was found between the two groups in terms of hospital stay and survival (p>0.05). CONCLUSION: It was considered that ceftriaxone can still be a viable option in the EAT of UTI, which is accompanied by bacteremia without severe sepsis and septic shock findings. It was concluded that EAT discordance may not have a negative effect on the duration of hospital stay and survival rates in neither total cases nor ESBL positive ones.