177Lu-PSMA-617 Radioligand Treatment in Elderly Patients with Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer: Therapeutic Efficacy and Safety Assessment.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy and safety of 177Lutetium-Prostate Specific Membrane Antigen (177Lu-PSMA-617) radioligand treatment (RLT) in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients with aged older than 75 years. METHODS: A total of 37 patients with mCRPC aged older than 75 years treated with 177Lu- PSMA-617 were included in this study. Pre-therapy and post-therapy biochemical, metabolic, and clinical response results and Hb, TLC, platelet, serum creatinine and bilirubin levels were checked to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy and toxicity profile. The Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events was used for grading adverse events caused by 177Lu-PSMA-617 treatment. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients included in the study was 79.8±2.9 (76-92). The number of 177Lu-PSMA-617 treatment cycles ranged from two to four, and the mean administered radioactivity dose was 5.6±0.8 GBq per cycle. Partial biochemical response (PR) and partial metabolic response (PMR) were observed in 11 (29.7%) and 15 (40.6%) patients after treatment, respectively. Although improvement in ECOG scores was observed in 5 (13.5%) patients after treatment, it was not statistically significant. Grade 2 and 3 Hb toxicity was observed in 10 (27%) and 2 (5.4%) patients, respectively. Grade 2 leukocytopenia in six patients, Grade 1 thrombocytopenia in six patients, and Grade 2 serum creatinine toxicity in five patients were seen after the treatment. On the other hand, no patients developed liver toxicity and grade 3 or 4 leukocytopenia, thrombocytopenia or creatinine toxicity. CONCLUSION: 177Lu-PSMA-617 treatment was a safe and effective treatment option for properly selected elderly mCRPC patients.

68Ga-FAPI PET/CT as an Alternative to 18F-FDG PET/CT in the Imaging of Invasive Lobular Breast Carcinoma.

Accurate staging of invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC), a subtype of breast cancer, is vital for effective clinical management. Although 18F-FDG PET/CT is a commonly used tool, its efficacy varies across different histologic subtypes. To mitigate this challenge, our investigation delves into the potential utility of 68Ga-fibroblast activation protein inhibitor (FAPI) PET/CT as an alternative for staging ILC, aiming to address a significant research gap using a more expansive patient cohort than the smaller samples commonly found in the existing literature. Methods: In this retrospective analysis, women diagnosed with primary ILC of the breast underwent both 18F-FDG PET/CT and 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT. Both modalities were compared across all lesion locations with the used reference standard. The interval between scans was 1 wk, without any intervening treatments. Lesions were categorized visually, and tracer activity was analyzed using SUVmax, tumor-to-background uptake ratio, and uptake ratios. Both modalities were compared across various parameters, and statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 22.0. A P value of less than 0.05 was chosen to determine statistical significance. Results: The study included 23 female ILC patients (mean age, 51 y) with hormone-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2-negative tumors. Most (65%) had the luminal A subtype. 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT outperformed 18F-FDG PET/CT, with higher tumoral activity and tumor-to-background uptake ratios (P < 0.001). Primary tumors showed significantly increased uptake with 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT (P < 0.001), detecting additional foci, including multicentric cancer. Axillary lymph node metastases were more frequent and had higher uptake values with 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT (P = 0.012). Moreover, 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT identified more lesions, including bone and liver metastases. Pathologic features did not significantly correlate with imaging modalities, but a positive correlation was observed between peritumoral lymphocyte ratio and 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT-to-18F-FDG PET/CT uptake ratios (P = 0.026). Conclusion: This study underscores 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT's superiority over 18F-FDG PET/CT for ILC. 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT excels in detecting primary breast masses, axillary lymph nodes, and distant metastases; can complement 18F-FDG PET/CT in ILC; and holds potential as an alternative imaging method in future studies.

Lutetium-177-PSMA-617 radioligand therapy in patients with high volume metastatic prostate cancer prior to chemotherapy and new generation androgen deprivation therapy: Clinical Experience.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate the efficacy oflutetium-177-prostate-specific membrane antigen-617 (177Lu-PSMA-617) with the luteinizing hormone releasing hormone (LHRH) analogues in the first or in the second-line setting formetastatic castration sensitive patients and metastatic castration resistance after progression with LHRH analogues. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Sixteen consecutive patients with high volume metastatic prostate cancer undergone 177Lu-PSMA-617 therapy who were refused chemotherapy and were unable to use new generation anti-androgen drugs because of unavailibility of reimbursement, were included in this retrospective study. Prostate specific antigen (PSA) response (>50% decrease), disease control rate (DCR: complete or partial response), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated to evaluate according to the clinicopathological features of the patients. Treatment response evaluated by 68Ga-PSMA-11 positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT). RESULTS: Mean age was 74,6 (SD±8,36). Among them, 7 (43,8%) patients has castration resistant disease, while the remaining has castration sensitive disease. Lutetium-177-PSMA-617 was administered to 10 (62,5%) patients as one of the first-line treatment and 6 patients received the treatment after progression on LHRH as a second-line treatment. Considering all patients, PSA response rate and DCR were 50% and 62% respectively. The median PFS and OS (with 95% CI) were 11,2 months (11-15) and 29 months (25,6-32,4), respectively in patients treated with 177Lu-PSMA-617 and LHRH analogues. Clinicopathological features and basal PSA level did not have effect on PSA response rates, DCR, OS and PFS. On the other hand, increment in PFS and OS (with 95% CI) was observed in castration resistant disease and in the second-line therapy; for castration resistant disease 16,5 months (12.3-19.7); 30 months (25.3-32.7), for the second-line therapy 14.5 months (12-20.5); 29 months (NR), respectively but statistically not significant. Serious toxicity was observed in a limited number of patients (18,7%), treatment-related death was not observed. CONCLUSION: Favorable results can be achived with second-line 177Lu-PSMA-617 treatment in terms of OS and PFS, especially in castration-resistant disease, when chemotherapy and new generation ADT's cannot be used.

Comparison of 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT and 18FDG PET/CT Modalities in Gastrointestinal System Malignancies with Peritoneal Involvement.

PURPOSE: In this study, we aimed to investigate the utilization of 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT in comparison to 18FDG PET/CT to evaluate the peritoneal involvement of the gastrointestinal malignancies alongside primary lesions and other metastatic foci. PROCEDURES: A total of 37 patients with various gastrointestinal malignancies with accompanying peritoneal involvement who underwent 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT and 18FDG PET/CT imaging between September 2020 and June 2021 were included in this retrospective study. SUVmax values of 68Ga-FAPI and 18FDG were compared according to lesion locations. Also, the lesion localization ability of both imaging was compared in patient basis. RESULTS: Of the 37 patients with peritoneal involvement (23 males and 14 females; median age, 62.8 ± 12.7 years), 35.1% (n = 13) had colorectal cancer, 37.8% (n = 14) gastric cancer, and 27.0% (n = 10) pancreaticobiliary cancer. While 45.9% of them were operated, the remaining did not have surgery. The mean time interval between two studies was 3.2 days (range: 2-6 days). The mean SUVmax value of peritoneal metastases (p < 0.001) was significantly higher with 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT compared to that with 18FDG PET/CT, as in primary lesions (p < 0.001), lymph node metastases (p = 0.006), liver metastases (p = 0.002), and bone metastases (p = 0.018). A total of 185 lesions was detected in the initial assessment with 18FDG PET/CT. Of the total lesions detected with 18FDG PET/CT, 5 of them were evaluated as benign lesions with 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT also in accordance with the reference standard. In addition to 180 lesions detected with 18FDG PET/CT, a total of 37 additional malignant lesions, 12 of which were peritoneal metastases, were detected with 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT. CONCLUSION: 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT was determined to be superior to 18FDG PET/CT in terms of detection of peritoneal involvement with high image quality as well as primary tumor and other metastatic foci. Consequently, 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT can be used as a complementary imaging modality especially for inconclusive 18FDG findings due to the lack of accuracy of 18FDG PET/CT in some of the metastatic regions, especially in the liver.

Comparison of [68Ga]-FAPI PET/CT and [18F]-FDG PET/CT in Multiple Myeloma: Clinical Experience.

OBJECTIVE: In this study, we aimed to compare [68Ga]FAPI PET/CT and [18F]FDG PET/CT imaging to detect lesions in multiple myeloma. METHODS: A total of 14 patients with multiple myeloma who underwent [68Ga]FAPI PET/CT and [18F]FDG PET/CT imaging were included in this retrospective study. SUVmax values of [68Ga]FAPI and [18F]FDG were compared according to lesion locations. Also, lesion localization ability of both imaging methods was compared on the patient basis. RESULTS: In 4 of 14 patients, [68Ga]FAPI PET/CT and [18F]FDG PET/CT have not detected any bone lesions. In 8 of the remaining 10 patients [18F]FDG PET/CT detected bone lesions but in this group, 6 patients showed more higher SUVmax values than [18F]FDG PET/CT in [68Ga]FAPI PET/CT.In contrast, 2 of 8 patients showed more higher SUVmax values than [68Ga]FAPI PET/CT in [18F]FDG PET/CT. Moreover, [68Ga]FAPI PET/CT detected bone lesions in two patients, which werenot detected by [18F]FDG PET/CT. Also, in five patients, [68Ga]FAPI PET/CT showed more bone lesions in comparison with[18F]FDG PET/CT. Only one patient, [18F]FDG PET/CT showed more bone lesions. Three extramedullary involvements were observed in the following locations: lung, presacral lymph node, and soft tissue mass lateral to the right maxillary sinus. Among these involvements, higher SUVmax values were observed in the lung and presacral lymph node with [68Ga]FAPI compared to [18F]FDG. However, the soft tissue mass showed a higher SUVmax value in [18F]FDG than [68Ga]FAPI. CONCLUSIONS: No significant superiority was observed in [68Ga]FAPI PET/CT over [18F]FDG PET/CT in patients with MM. However, [68Ga]FAPI PET/CT can be utilized as a complementary imaging method to [18F]FDG PET/CT in some settings, especially in low-[18F]FDG affinity and inconclusive cases. Considering the favorable aspects of [68Ga]FAPI PET/CT in MM, such as low background activity, absence of non-specific bone marrow, and physiological brain involvement, further studies with a larger sample size should be conducted.

Superiority of 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT scan in detecting additional lesions compared to 18FDG PET/CT scan in breast cancer.

PURPOSE: We compared the ability of 68Ga-FAPI PET//CT with 18FDG PET/CT imaging techniques to detect additional lesions in breast cancer patients that may affect further chemotherapy options. METHODS: A total of 48 patients with breast cancer underwent concurrent 68Ga-FAPI-04 and 18FDG PET/CT regardless of whether they had received chemotherapy or not in the last month before imaging. Both modalities were compared according to various parameters: clinical/pathological features, number of lesions detected, activity uptake (SUVmax), and the effect on the evaluation of response to treatment in the post-chemotherapy group. RESULTS: This retrospective study included 48 patients with breast cancer (mean age 53.3 ± 11.7 years; IDC 89.6%; ILC 10.4%). In the comparison of both modalities, no statistical significance was obtained in terms of the pathological characteristics of the patients. More lesions were demonstrated in all categorized regions in 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT imaging with higher uptake values compared to 18FDG PET/CT in this study. In the treatment response evaluation of the post-chemotherapy group, 12 cases (12/24) who were evaluated as PMR, CMR, or SD according to 18FDG PET/CT results were later accepted as PD due to newly detected lesions in complementary 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT imaging and treatment of patients was managed accordingly by clinicians. CONCLUSION: It was determined that 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT was superior to 18FDG PET/CT in terms of accuracy and it was thought that 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT could be utilized as an additional complementary imaging to 18FDG PET/CT. Moreover, 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT, with its significant theranostic potential, could become a key element in predicting the pathological response of breast cancer patients in further researches.

Comparison of 68Ga-DOTA-FAPI and 18FDG PET/CT imaging modalities in the detection of liver metastases in patients with gastrointestinal system cancer.

PURPOSE: We aimed to compare the diagnostic performance of PET/CT imaging performed with 68Ga-DOTA-FAPI and 18FDG in detection of liver metastases in patients with gastrointestinal system (GIS) cancer. METHODS: A total of 31 patients who underwent 68Ga-DOTA-FAPI and 18F-FDG PET/CT examinations and diagnosed with GIS cancer (15 colorectal, 9 pancreas, 4 stomach and 3 other cancers) were included in the study. The presence of liver metastasis was decided based on histopathologic diagnosis, PET/CT, other radiologic examinations or tumor biomarker findings, and both PET/CT imaging findings were compared on the patient and lesion basis. RESULTS: Of the 31 patients, 28 were found as true positive with 68Ga-DOTA-FAPI-PET/CT and 17 with 18FDG-PET/CT. Of the 98 metastatic liver lesions determined according to our diagnostic criteria, 92 were found as true positive lesions with 68Ga-DOTA-FAPI-PET/CT and 65 with 18FDG-PET/CT. There was a statistically significant difference between both imaging modalities in the patient and lesion based comparisons (p < 0.05). When semiquantitative values (SUVmax, mlr) obtained from the lesions were compared between the two imaging methods, mlr values showed statistically significant difference in all tumor subgroups (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: It was concluded that 68Ga-DOTA-FAPI-PET/CT was superior over 18FDG-PET/CT in detection of liver metastases of GIS cancers and it can be a complementary method especially in negative cases with 18FDG-PET/CT.