Comparación del ángulo de la guía condílea sagital obtenida del registro radiográfico y clínico en pacientes dentados / Comparison of sagittal condylar guidance obtained from radiographic and and clinical records in dentate patients

Objetivo: Comparar el ángulo de la guía condílea sagital obtenida del registro radiográfico y clínico en pacientes dentados. Materiales y métodos: La muestra estuvo conformada por un grupo único de estudio de 32 pacientes, en el que se evaluó la radiografía lateral estricta y los registros posicionales: en relación céntrica, registro protrusivo a 5 mm en lateralidad derecha y registro protrusivo a 5 mm en lateralidad izquierda. Con el registro posicional del arco facial se articuló el modelo superior, con el registro posicional en relación céntrica se articuló el modelo inferior, con los registros laterales protrusivos de los lados derecho e izquierdo se obtuvo la medida del ángulo de la guía condílea sagital para la programación del articulador semiajustable. El plan estadístico en la presente investigación utilizó el programa SPSS versión 24, la normalidad fue evaluada usando el test de Shapiro-Wilk, también se realizaron las pruebas de T de Student y correlación de Pearson. Resultados: Se determinó estadísticamente que el género y la edad influyen en la medida del ángulo de la guía condílea sagital. El método radiográfico presentó un ángulo de guía condílea de 35,69 ±5,18 y con el método clínico fue 35,69 ± 5,16 (p > 0,05). La prueba de correlación de Pearson sí mostró una correlación importante entre ambos métodos r = 0,948, p < 0,001. Conclusiones: Existe alta correlación en las medidas obtenidas del ángulo de la guía condílea sagital con los registros radiográficos y clínicos; esta concordancia permitiría reemplazar un método por el otro. (AU)

Objective: To compare the angle of the sagittal condylar guidance obtained from the radiographic and clinical records of dentate patients. Materials and Methods: The sample consisted of 32 patients in whom strict lateral radiography and positional records were performed: in centric relation, protrusive recording 5 mm in right laterality and protrusive recording 5 mm in left laterality. With the positional registration of the facebow, the upper model was articulated, while the lower model was articulated with the positional registration in centric relation, and with the protrusive lateral registrations on the right and left side the condylar guidance was obtained for programming the semi-adjustable articulator. Statistics were performed with the SPSS program version 24 in Spanish. Normality was evaluated using the Shapiro-Wilk test, for data with normal distribution, and the Student's T test and Pearson's correlation were performed in descriptive statistics. Results: The statistical analyses showed that gender and age influence the angle measurement of the sagittal condylar guide. The radiographic method presented a condylar guide angle of 35.69 ± 5.18, being 35.69 ± 5.16 with the clinical method (p> 0.05). Pearson's correlation test showed an important correlation between the two methods (r = 0.948, p <0.001). Conclusions: There is a high correlation in the measurements obtained from the angle of the sagittal condylar guide and the radiographic and clinical records, indicating that both methods are effective. (AU)

[Comparison of sagittal condylar guidance obtained from radiographic and clinical records in dentate patients]. / Comparación del ángulo de la guía condílea sagital obtenida del registro radiográfico y clínico en pacientes dentados.

Objective: To compare the angle of the sagittal condylar guidance obtained from the radiographic and clinical records of dentate patients. Materials and Methods: The sample consisted of 32 patients in whom strict lateral radiography and positional records were performed: in centric relation, protrusive recording 5 mm in right laterality and protrusive recording 5 mm in left laterality. With the positional registration of the facebow, the upper model was articulated, while the lower model was articulated with the positional registration in centric relation, and with the protrusive lateral registrations on the right and left side the condylar guidance was obtained for programming the semi-adjustable articulator. Statistics were performed with the SPSS program version 24 in Spanish. Normality was evaluated using the Shapiro-Wilk test, for data with normal distribution, and the Student's T test and Pearson's correlation were performed in descriptive statistics. Results: The statistical analyses showed that gender and age influence the angle measurement of the sagittal condylar guide. The radiographic method presented a condylar guide angle of 35.69 ± 5.18, being 35.69 ± 5.16 with the clinical method (p> 0.05). Pearson's correlation test showed an important correlation between the two methods (r = 0.948, p <0.001). Conclusions: There is a high correlation in the measurements obtained from the angle of the sagittal condylar guide and the radiographic and clinical records, indicating that both methods are effective.