RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: In Turkey, orthodontic treatments of individuals aged <18 years are covered by the Social Security Institution (SSI) according to the Index of Complexity, Outcome, and Need (ICON) index at contracted healthcare providers. The aim of this study was to determine treatment needs and difficulties of patients applying to orthodontic clinics in state and foundation universities in Istanbul according to the ICON and to evaluate the extent of treatment coverage by the SSI. METHODS: Pre-treatment study casts of 831 patients were evaluated in terms of treatment needs and difficulties according to the ICON. This sample was distributed as 677 patients who applied to a State University's Orthodontic Department and 154 who applied to a Foundation University's Orthodontic Department. RESULTS: At the state university, 27.9% of the 437 patients had a score of <43 and were thus, described as "no treatment needed." At the foundation university, 35% of the 154 patients had a score <43 and were thus, described as "no treatment needed." When the ICON scores of the two universities were compared, no statistically significant difference was found between treatment needs distributions. CONCLUSION: The number of patients who applied for treatment for the same period was three times higher in the state university than in the foundation university, whereas the rates of treatment needs were found to be similar between both state and foundation universities. At both universities, nearly one-third of patients were evaluated as "no treatment needed." The ICON index was found to be a reliable index in terms of reproducibility.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the skeletal and dental changes in Class III patients treated with Modified Jasper Jumper appliance and Delaire face mask before the growth peak. METHODS: A study sample comprising 16 patients with functional Class III malocclusion treated with Modified Jasper Jumper appliance and 17 patients treated with Delaire face mask was compared with a control group comprising 13 patients. Pancherz analysis was used as the analysis method. RESULTS: In both treatment groups forward movement of maxillary base and incisors and an increase in the overjet while no positional change in the mandibular base was observed. In the Modified Jasper Jumper group, 4.63 mm overjet correction was due to 51.4% skeletal and 48.6% dental changes; 4.77 mm Class III molar correction was due to 49.9% skeletal and 50.1% dental changes. In the Delaire face mask group, 5.17 mm overjet correction was due to 70.6% skeletal and 29.4% dental changes and 4.87 mm Class III molar correction was due to 75% skeletal and 25% dental changes. CONCLUSION: It was shown that both appliances were skeletally and dentally effective. Therefore, Modified Jasper Jumper therapy may be an alternative treatment modality for patients with poor cooperation, who are not ideal recipients for Delaire face mask.
