RESUMO
Background: Tuberculin skin test (TST) has played an essential in the diagnosis of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) for nearly a century. Objective: This study aimed to investigate the general characteristics of patients tested with TST in a tertiary hospital within two years. Methods: All patients who were evaluated to screen for tuberculosis and received a TST were included. The Mantoux method was used for TST administration. Results: A total of 661 patients, 345 (52.2%) men and 316 (47.8%) women, with a mean age of 43.0 ±15.9 years, were included in the study. Accordingly, TST was performed prior to anti-TNF biological agent therapy for 50% (331) of the participants, for LTBI screening before solid organ and/or hematological stem cell transplantation for 20.4% (135), for screening following contact with tuberculosis for 25.1% (166), for screening of healthcare professionals for 1.1% (7), and medical report for 3.3% (22). 2.7% of the patients who took TST were diagnosed with active tuberculosis (14 with pulmonary tuberculosis and 4 with extrapulmonary tuberculosis). QuantiFERON-TB Gold (QFT) test was performed in 332 (50.2%) patients with anergic TST results. According to TST and QFT test results, 28.3% (187) of the patients were started on tuberculosis prophylaxis. Conclusion: While TST is most performed for LTBI screening prior to biological agent therapy, almost one-fourth of patients taking TST require tuberculosis prophylaxis. On the other hand, about half of the patients require an additional QFT test.
Antecedentes: La prueba de la tuberculina ha jugado un papel fundamental en el diagnóstico de la infección latente por tuberculosis durante casi un siglo. Objetivo: Investigar las características generales de los pacientes a los que se les realizó la prueba de tuberculina en un hospital de tercer nivel. Métodos: Se incluyeron todos los pacientes que fueron incluidos en un tamizaje de tuberculosis mediante la prueba de tuberculina. Se utilizó el método de Mantoux para la administración de esta prueba. Resultados: Se incluyeron en el estudio un total de 661 pacientes, 345 (52.2%) hombres y 316 (47.8%) mujeres, con una edad media de 43.0 ±15.9 años. La prueba de tuberculina se realizó en el 50% (331) de los participantes, antes de la terapia con agentes biológicos anti-TNF; En el 20.4% (135) se hizo la prueba antes del trasplante de órganos sólidos y/o células madre hematológicas; para el 25.1% (166) se realizó tras contacto con la tuberculosis, el 1.1% (7) para tamizaje de los profesionales sanitarios y con informe médico para el 3.3% (22). El 2.7% de los pacientes que se realizaron la prueba de tuberculina fueron diagnosticados con tuberculosis activa (14 pulmonar y 4 extrapulmonar). La prueba QuantiFERON-TB Gold (QFT) se realizó en 332 (50.2 %) pacientes con resultados anérgicos para tuberculina. Según los resultados de las pruebas de tuberculina y QFT, el 28.3% (187) de los pacientes iniciaron profilaxis antituberculosa. Conclusión: Si bien la prueba de tuberculina se realiza comúnmente para la detección de tuberculosis latente antes de la terapia con agentes biológicos, casi una cuarta parte de los pacientes que se les hizo la prueba de tuberculina requieren profilaxis para tuberculosis. Por otro lado, aproximadamente la mitad de los pacientes requieren una prueba QFT adicional.
RESUMO
Background: Tuberculin skin test (TST) has played an essential in the diagnosis of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) for nearly a century. Objective: This study aimed to investigate the general characteristics of patients tested with TST in a tertiary hospital within two years. Methods: All patients who were evaluated to screen for tuberculosis and received a TST were included. The Mantoux method was used for TST administration. Results: A total of 661 patients, 345 (52.2%) men and 316 (47.8%) women, with a mean age of 43.0 ±15.9 years, were included in the study. Accordingly, TST was performed prior to anti-TNF biological agent therapy for 50% (331) of the participants, for LTBI screening before solid organ and/or hematological stem cell transplantation for 20.4% (135), for screening following contact with tuberculosis for 25.1% (166), for screening of healthcare professionals for 1.1% (7), and medical report for 3.3% (22). 2.7% of the patients who took TST were diagnosed with active tuberculosis (14 with pulmonary tuberculosis and 4 with extrapulmonary tuberculosis). QuantiFERON-TB Gold (QFT) test was performed in 332 (50.2%) patients with anergic TST results. According to TST and QFT test results, 28.3% (187) of the patients were started on tuberculosis prophylaxis. Conclusion: While TST is most performed for LTBI screening prior to biological agent therapy, almost one-fourth of patients taking TST require tuberculosis prophylaxis. On the other hand, about half of the patients require an additional QFT test.
Antecedentes: La prueba de la tuberculina ha jugado un papel fundamental en el diagnóstico de la infección latente por tuberculosis durante casi un siglo. Objetivo: Investigar las características generales de los pacientes a los que se les realizó la prueba de tuberculina en un hospital de tercer nivel. Métodos: Se incluyeron todos los pacientes que fueron incluidos en un tamizaje de tuberculosis mediante la prueba de tuberculina. Se utilizó el método de Mantoux para la administración de esta prueba. Resultados: Se incluyeron en el estudio un total de 661 pacientes, 345 (52.2%) hombres y 316 (47.8%) mujeres, con una edad media de 43.0 ±15.9 años. La prueba de tuberculina se realizó en el 50% (331) de los participantes, antes de la terapia con agentes biológicos anti-TNF; En el 20.4% (135) se hizo la prueba antes del trasplante de órganos sólidos y/o células madre hematológicas; para el 25.1% (166) se realizó tras contacto con la tuberculosis, el 1.1% (7) para tamizaje de los profesionales sanitarios y con informe médico para el 3.3% (22). El 2.7% de los pacientes que se realizaron la prueba de tuberculina fueron diagnosticados con tuberculosis activa (14 pulmonar y 4 extrapulmonar). La prueba QuantiFERON-TB Gold (QFT) se realizó en 332 (50.2 %) pacientes con resultados anérgicos para tuberculina. Según los resultados de las pruebas de tuberculina y QFT, el 28.3% (187) de los pacientes iniciaron profilaxis antituberculosa. Conclusión: Si bien la prueba de tuberculina se realiza comúnmente para la detección de tuberculosis latente antes de la terapia con agentes biológicos, casi una cuarta parte de los pacientes que se les hizo la prueba de tuberculina requieren profilaxis para tuberculosis. Por otro lado, aproximadamente la mitad de los pacientes requieren una prueba QFT adicional.
Assuntos
Tuberculose Latente , Tuberculose , Masculino , Humanos , Feminino , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Tuberculina , Inibidores do Fator de Necrose Tumoral , Tuberculose/diagnóstico , Teste Tuberculínico/métodos , Tuberculose Latente/diagnósticoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The antifibrotic drugs nintedanib and pirfenidone reduce disease progression in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) and have also shown to improve survival. Switching first-line antifibrotic drug may required in IPF due to disease progression or intolerable adverse effects. The aim of this study was to assess the safety and efficacy of second-line antifibrotic treatment in patients with IPF. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This retrospective, multicenter study was conducted at three referral interstitial lung disease centers who received first-line antifibrotics more than one month and switched the treatment to a second-line antifibrotic agent during January 2016-June 2021. The drug's safety was evaluated based on the type of adverse effect. Disease progression was defined as an absolute decline in FVC of >10% within 12 months with or without radiological progression. RESULTS: Among 629 consecutive patients with IPF, 66 patients switched antifibrotics. The median duration of antifibrotics was 13 (1-41) months prior to the switch, and 14 (2-42) months after the switch. The mean age was 70.6 ± 8.9 years and, median FVC (%) was 72.1 ± 18.7 at the initiation of first-line antifibrotics. The most common reason for the switch was disease progression (56%) followed by severe adverse effects (SAEs) (44%). SAEs were significantly less observed after the switch compared before the switch (43.9% vs12.1%, respectively, p < 0.001). Eighteen patients had adverse effects due to second-line antifibrotics. Among these patients, 10 had mild adverse effects and 8 had severe adverse effects. While there was no change in the FVC (%) values in 30.3% patients 12 months after the first-line antifibrotic treatment (before the switch), there was no change in the FVC (%) values in 40% patients at the end of 12 months after the switch. Fourteen patients (42.4%) who received antifibrotic treatment before the switch had more than 10% decline in FVC (%) at the end of 12 months. Eight patients (32.0%) had 10% or more decline in FVC (%) 12 months after the switch. CONCLUSION: Patients with IPF who do not tolerate first-line antifibrotic treatment or those showing disease progression despite treatment, switching antifibrotics may be a feasible management strategy.
