Gesture use in L1-Turkish and L2-English: Evidence from emotional narrative retellings.

Bilinguals tend to produce more co-speech hand gestures to compensate for reduced communicative proficiency when speaking in their L2. We here investigated L1-Turkish and L2-English speakers' gesture use in an emotional context. We specifically asked whether and how (1) speakers gestured differently while retelling L1 versus L2 and positive versus negative narratives and (2) gesture production during retellings was associated with speakers' later subjective emotional intensity ratings of those narratives. We asked 22 participants to read and then retell eight emotion-laden narratives (half positive, half negative; half Turkish, half English). We analysed gesture frequency during the entire retelling and during emotional speech only (i.e., gestures that co-occur with emotional phrases such as "happy"). Our results showed that participants produced more representational gestures in L2 than in L1; however, they used more representational gestures during emotional content in L1 than in L2. Participants also produced more co-emotional speech gestures when retelling negative than positive narratives, regardless of language, and more beat gestures co-occurring with emotional speech in negative narratives in L1. Furthermore, using more gestures when retelling a narrative was associated with increased emotional intensity ratings for narratives. Overall, these findings suggest that (1) bilinguals might use representational gestures to compensate for reduced linguistic proficiency in their L2, (2) speakers use more gestures to express negative emotional information, particularly during emotional speech, and (3) gesture production may enhance the encoding of emotional information, which subsequently leads to the intensification of emotion perception.

Correct triage at the scene increases success in the ED: Sabiha Gökçen Airport plane accident.

BACKGROUND: Triage is the most important part of the management of events, such as accidents, earthquakes, fires, and floods, in which mass injuries occur. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effects of triage on patient outcomes, injuries, the role of trauma mechanisms, and spinal immobilization during transportation following the plane crash at the Istanbul Sabiha Gökçen airport that involved 183 patients on February 5, 2020. METHODS: Command control center data and ambulance and medical charts were examined retrospectively. The results were evaluated in terms of spinal immobilization, injury type, triage codes, and ISS values during emergency interventions and transportation. RESULTS: We received the first notice at 18: 21 about the plane that had landed and crashed at 18: 19 on February 5, 2020, and the first team reached the security gate at 18: 26. The first team arrived at the debris field and performed triage. On the airside of the airport, the first victims were taken at 18: 32, transferred at 18: 36, and reached the hospital at 18: 41. The first case was taken from the debris field at 18: 35 and transferred to the hospital. Of the 183 patients on the plane, three became exitus at the scene, 43.7% of the victims were female, and the mean age was 35.0±15.7. The mean systolic blood pressure of the victims was 122.0±17.4. The mean distance to hospitals, transportation time, intervention time, heart rate, and ISS levels were measured as 55.0 (23.0-79.0) km; 780.5 (390.0-1540.0) s; 817.0 (552.0-1200.0) s; 86.0 (78.0-100.0); and 4.5 (1.0-9.0), respectively. A positive significant correlation was found between ISS and the days of hospitalization (r=0.577; p<0.001). CONCLUSION: The fact that no patient was lost during the follow-up and treatment is an indication that triage, appropriate patient referral to the appropriate hospital, and primary and secondary care are well performed, as well as the crash of the plane while landing. Coordinated acts of the airport and 112 emergency health services and guidance for appropriate triage reduced both pre-hospital and hospital mortality.