Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
F1000Res ; 12: 612, 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39027921

RESUMO

Background: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is an invasive procedure. We aimed to investigate ERCP-induced perforations at our institution and conduct a comprehensive review of literature on ERCP-induced perforations (EIP) since the introduction of this procedure as a therapeutic intervention. Methods: This was a case-control study, in which charts of all patients diagnosed with ERCP-induced duodenal perforation were reviewed and compared to a control group without perforation. Patient's sociodemographic and clinical data, including ERCP procedure-related data, were gathered. Results: A total of 996 ERCP procedures were performed; only 13 patients proved to have EIP. Obstructive jaundice was the most common indication for ERCP. The main predisposing factor was difficult cannulation (P = 0.003). In total, five patients required surgical treatment; the majority of them had type I perforation, whereas type IV was the most common in patients who were treated conservatively. The overall mortality rate was 15%, the surgical group had a slightly higher mortality rate. Conclusions: Fifty years after the introduction of ERCP for therapy, it remains an invasive procedure that carries significant morbidity and mortality, even in skilled hands or at high- volume units. Conservative management of perforation yields favorable outcomes in selected patients.


Assuntos
Colangiopancreatografia Retrógrada Endoscópica , Perfuração Intestinal , Colangiopancreatografia Retrógrada Endoscópica/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Perfuração Intestinal/etiologia , Perfuração Intestinal/cirurgia , Masculino , Feminino , Idoso , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Adulto
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...