Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Obes Surg ; 30(11): 4293-4299, 2020 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32583298

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Weight loss after bariatric surgery varies among patients. Patients who do not complete long-term follow-up are considered to loose less weight than those with regular follow-up visits. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the influence of patients' follow-up compliance on long-term excess weight loss (%EWL) and total weight loss (%TWL) after bariatric surgery, comparing results between gastric bypass (GB) and sleeve gastrectomy (SG). METHODS: Patients with up to 5 years of follow-up data after bariatric surgery were included in this retrospective analysis. Patients were divided in 2 groups: those in group 1 who had attended every scheduled postoperative appointment and those in group 2 who had been lost to follow-up before 1 year and were later contacted by telephone. %EWL and %TWL were compared to determine the possible relationship between type of surgery and regularity of the follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 385 patients were included. A significant difference in EWL was observed at 5 years in the SG group (78% for group 1 versus 39% for group 2; p = 0.02) and GB group (75% for group 1 versus 62% for group 2; p = 0.01). No significant differences between surgeries were found when comparing long-term EWL in group 1 patients 77% for SG versus 75% for GB. For group 2 patients, GB achieved greater EWL than SG; p = 0.005. %TWL patients in group 2 showed significant differences in all periods of study (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Bariatric surgery patients who attended all scheduled follow-up appointments experienced significantly greater long-term EWL and TWL than those who did not. GB has apparent increased benefits for weight loss in long-term follow-up when compared with SG for patients who did not attend long-term follow-up. Therefore, continued long-term follow-up of bariatric patients should be encouraged to increase postoperative weight loss results.


Assuntos
Cirurgia Bariátrica , Derivação Gástrica , Obesidade Mórbida , Seguimentos , Gastrectomia , Humanos , Obesidade Mórbida/cirurgia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Redução de Peso
2.
Clin Transl Oncol ; 19(3): 379-385, 2017 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27496023

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is being actively tested as an emerging alternative for the treatment of locally advanced colon cancer (LACC) patients, resembling its use in other gastrointestinal tumors. This study assesses the mid-term oncologic outcome of LACC patients treated with oxaliplatin and fluoropyrimidines-based preoperative chemotherapy followed by surgery. METHODS AND PATIENTS: Patients with radiologically resectable LACC treated with neoadjuvant therapy between 2009 and 2014 were retrospectively analyzed. Radiological, metabolic, and pathological tumor response was assessed. Both postoperative complications, relapse-free survival (RFS), and overall survival (OS) were studied. RESULTS: Sixty-five LACC patients who received treatment were included. Planned treatment was completed by 93.8 % of patients. All patients underwent surgery without delay. The median time between the start of chemotherapy and surgery was 71 days (65-82). No progressive disease was observed during preoperative treatment. A statistically significant tumor volume reduction of 62.5 % was achieved by CT scan (39.8-79.8) (p < 0.001). It was also observed a median reduction of 40.5 % (24.2-63.7 %) (p < 0.005) of SUVmax (Standard Uptake Value) by PET-CT scan. Complete pathologic response was achieved in 4.6 % of patients. Postoperative complications were observed in 15.4 % of patients, with no cases of mortality. After a median follow-up of 40.1 months, (p 25-p 75: 27.3-57.8) 3-5 year actuarial RFS was 88.9-85.6 %, respectively. Five-year actuarial OS was 95.3 %. CONCLUSION: Preoperative chemotherapy in LACC patients is safe and able to induce major tumor regression. Survival times are encouraging, and further research seems warranted.


Assuntos
Adenocarcinoma/terapia , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias do Colo/terapia , Terapia Neoadjuvante , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/terapia , Adenocarcinoma/patologia , Idoso , Capecitabina/administração & dosagem , Neoplasias do Colo/patologia , Terapia Combinada , Feminino , Fluoruracila/administração & dosagem , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Gradação de Tumores , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/patologia , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Compostos Organoplatínicos/administração & dosagem , Oxaliplatina , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Prognóstico , Estudos Prospectivos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Taxa de Sobrevida
3.
J Surg Oncol ; 49(1): 52-7, 1992 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-1548883

RESUMO

Intestinal hemorrhage due to arteriodigestive fistula is described to be a rare and serious complication of radiotherapy. Three cases of this type of fistula in gastric cancer patients treated with gastrectomy, intraoperative electron boost (15 Gy), and fractionated external beam irradiation (46 Gy) are reported. Selective angiography is most helpful in the diagnosis and immediate surgery could be lifesaving. An attempt to explain the etiopathogenesis is made.


Assuntos
Artéria Celíaca , Fístula/etiologia , Fístula Intestinal/etiologia , Artérias Mesentéricas , Lesões por Radiação , Neoplasias Gástricas/radioterapia , Estômago/irrigação sanguínea , Adulto , Duodenopatias/etiologia , Feminino , Fístula/diagnóstico por imagem , Fístula/cirurgia , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/etiologia , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/cirurgia , Humanos , Fístula Intestinal/diagnóstico por imagem , Fístula Intestinal/cirurgia , Doenças do Jejuno/etiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Lesões por Radiação/cirurgia , Radiografia , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirurgia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...