Prognostic value of margin clearance in total and distal pancreatectomy specimens with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma in a Danish population-based nationwide study.

BACKGROUND: The prognostic role of resection margin status following total (TP) and distal (DP) pancreatectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is insufficiently evaluated. In Denmark, pancreatic surgery, including the postoperative pathological examination of the resection specimens, is confined to four centres, all reporting to the Danish Pancreatic Cancer Database (DPCD). In this Danish population-based nationwide study on TP and DP for PDAC from 2015-2019, based on data from DPCD, we evaluated whether there is a prognostically relevant minimum margin clearance definition and whether certain margins hold independent prognostic information. METHODS: Clinical and pathological data were retrieved from DPCD and supplemented by review of pathology reports and re-microscopy, if needed. One of the study pathologists performed all re-microscopy. The prognostic significance of margin status was evaluated by dichotomisation of the TP cohort (n = 101) and the DP cohort (n = 90) into involved and uninvolved groups, using different clearance definitions (0.5 - ≥3.0 mm). RESULTS: Following TP, direct involvement of the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) margin had independent prognostic value. When using a clearance definition of ≥ 0.5 or ≥ 1.5 mm for SMA, median survival for R0 versus R1 was 19 (95% CI 14-26) versus 10 (95% CI 5-20) months (p = 0.010), and 21 (95% CI 15-30) versus 10 (95% CI 8-19) months (p = 0.011), respectively. Overall margin status was not of significant prognostic importance following neither DP nor TP. CONCLUSION: In this Danish population-based nationwide study, SMA margin involvement was a significant isolated prognostic factor following TP, whereas combined assessment of all circumferential margins did not hold statistically significant prognostic information. Following DP, resection margin status did not affect survival.

Prognostic importance of margin clearance in ampullary adenocarcinoma following pancreaticoduodenectomy in a Danish population-based nationwide study.

BACKGROUND: In this Danish nationwide population-based study, we evaluated the prognostically relevant minimum tumour-free margin width following pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) for ampullary adenocarcinoma (AAC) and evaluated whether certain margins hold independent prognostic information. METHODS: We included 128 patients who underwent PD for AAC from 2015 to 2019. Clinical and pathological data including well-known prognostic factors were retrieved from the Danish Pancreatic Cancer Database. Missing data were obtained by review of pathology reports and re-microscopy of resection specimens. All PD specimens were examined using a standardised pathological protocol including multicolour inking, axial slicing and exact reporting of margin widths. The cohort was dichotomised into involved and uninvolved groups, using different margin clearance definitions (0.5-≥3.0 mm). RESULTS: Following PD for AAC, margin clearance of ≥1 mm was independently associated with improved chance of survival compared with <1 mm (HR: 0.30, 95 % CI: 0.14-0.64 (p = 0.002)). Posterior and anterior margin widths were narrower compared with superior mesenteric artery and vein margins. Posterior margin and anterior surface had isolated prognostic significance in multivariable analysis. CONCLUSION: Following PD for AAC, margin clearance of at least 1 mm is independently associated with improved survival. Our data further indicate that anterior surface and posterior margin hold particular prognostic value.

Prognostic significance of margin clearance in pancreaticoduodenectomy specimens with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma in a Danish population-based nationwide study.

BACKGROUND: In this nationwide population-based cohort study, we investigated the overall minimum margin width that is independently associated with improved survival following pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and evaluated whether certain margins or surfaces hold independent prognostic significance. METHODS: Data from 367 patients who underwent PD for PDAC in the period 2015-2019 were retrieved from the Danish Pancreatic Cancer Database. Missing data were obtained by review of pathology reports and re-microscopy of resection specimens. Surgical specimens were evaluated using a standardised pathological protocol involving multicolour inking, axial slicing and exact reporting of circumferential margin clearances in 0.5 mm increments. RESULTS: When categorised according to margin widths of <0.5, <1.0, <1.5, <2.0, <2.5 and <3.0 mm, R1 resections were detected in 34%, 57%, 75%, 78%, 86% and 87% of cases, respectively. In multivariable analyses, an overall margin clearance of ≥1.5 mm was associated with improved survival compared with a clearance of <1.5 mm (HR 0.70 95% CI 0.51-0.97 (p = 0.031)). When evaluating the margins separately, no margin had independent prognostic significance. CONCLUSION: Margin clearance of at least 1.5 mm was independently associated with improved survival following PD for PDAC.

Synchronous detection of pancreatic adenocarcinoma and paraganglioma in a Whipple resection specimen.

We report a case of a pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) presenting synchronously with a paraganglioma (PGL) in a Whipple reaction specimen. The patient was a 72-year-old female with a history of breast and vulvar cancer. The simultaneous occurrence of two synchronous tumours in the pancreas was striking. Due to the presence of PGL and multiple meta- and synchronous tumours, the patient was referred to genetic counselling. Tumour tissue from the vulvar carcinoma, the PDAC and the PGL was analysed by targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) of 161 cancer-related genes and by whole exome sequencing (WES). Peripheral blood was also examined by NGS and WES. These genetic analyses revealed germline polymorphisms in AXIN2 (NM_004655.4:c 0.2272 G>A; p.Ala758Thr), BRCA2 (NM_000059.3:c.9976 A>T; p.Lys3326Ter), NCOR1 (NM_006311.4:c 0.6544 G>A; p.Ala2182Thr) and SPTA1 (NM_003126.3:c 0.373 G>A; p.Ala125Thr) and somatic mutations of KRAS (NM_033360.3;c 0.35 G>A; p.Gly12Asp) and TP53 (NM_000546.5; c.602delT; p.Leu201CysfsTer46) in the PDAC and of TP53 (NM_000546.5; c 0.733 G>A; p.Gly245Ser) and TERT (NM_198253.2; c.-124 C>T; promotor region) in the vulvar carcinoma. Breast carcinoma tissue was not available for genetic analysis. The results of the genetic analyses did not explain the presence of multiple tumours in this patient, despite a slightly increased risk of breast cancer associated with the identified BRCA2 polymorphism. To our knowledge, this is the first report of the synchronous occurrence of PDAC and PGL. This case emphasizes the importance of thorough macroscopic examination of pancreatic resection specimens, as coexisting neoplasms may otherwise be missed.

Synchronous detection of SDHA-related gallbladder paraganglioma and pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor.

Primary gallbladder paragangliomas (PGLs) are exceedingly rare. PGLs are extraadrenal neuroendocrine tumors that are morphologically inseparable from intraadrenal pheochromocytomas. PGLs and pheochromocytomas are some of the most heritable tumor types in the body and are often associated with other tumors or part of a genetic syndrome. We report a case of gallbladder PGL presenting synchronously with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (NET) and pulmonary IgG4-related disease in a 74-year old male patient with disseminated prostate adenocarcinoma. Due to the high rate of germline mutations and the possible syndromal manifestation of PGLs as well as pancreatic NETs, this patient was offered genetic testing, and a pathogenic SDHA germline mutation was found. Immunohistochemically, there was loss of SDHA and SDHB in the PGL but neither in the NET nor in the prostate adenocarcinoma. To our knowledge, this case is the first report of gallbladder PGL associated with pancreatic NET. It is likely that the identified SDHA germline mutation played a role in the development of gallbladder PGL in this patient.