Surveillance evaluations in patients with stage I, II, III, or resectable IV melanoma who were treated with curative intent: A systematic review.

PURPOSE: Appropriate surveillance of patients with melanoma treated with curative intent is vital to improve patient outcomes. A systematic review was conducted to capture locoregional recurrence and metastatic disease, and to evaluate the effectiveness of various surveillance strategies. METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and National Cancer Institute Clinical Trials Database were searched. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and comparative studies reporting at least one patient-related outcome were included. Exclusion criteria included: published in non-English or recruited >20 % or an uncertain percentage of non-target patients without conducting a subgroup analysis for the target patients. This review was registered at PROSPERO (CRD42021246482). RESULTS: Among 17,978 publications from the literature search, one RCT and five non-randomized comparative studies were included and comprised 4016 patients. The aggregate evidence certainty was low for the RCT and very low for the comparative studies, as assessed by the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) approach. For patients with stage IA-IIC melanoma, a reduced follow-up schedule with clinical follow-up strategies alone may be safe and cost-effective. For stage IIC-IIIC patients, at least two serial PET/CT or whole-body CT and brain MRI imaging within a median follow-up of 31.2 months may detect 50 % of recurrences that lead to additional management, such as surgery. PET/CT may have a higher positive predictive value and lower false positive rate compared with CT alone in detecting recurrence in stage I-III patients. CONCLUSION: Surveillance protocols should be based on individual risk of recurrence and established best practices when formulating follow-up strategies, as suggested by the studies reviewed. Future high-quality studies are needed to clarify the frequency of imaging follow-up strategies, especially in patients with high-risk stage II melanoma.

Lesional therapies for in-transit melanoma.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: To describe the outcomes of lesional therapy of in-transit melanoma (ITM) with interleukin-2 (IL-2), diphencyprone (DPCP), combination lesional therapy (IL-2, retinoid, and imiquimod; CLT), and imiquimod. METHODS: Data was collected for consecutive patients with ITM receiving lesional therapies from 2008 to 2018 in a retrospective review. Included patients did not have metastatic disease at time of starting on lesional therapy and were not on systemic therapy. The primary outcome was complete pathologic response (pCR). RESULTS: Of 83 patients, 57 (69%) started treatment with IL-2, 10 (12%) with DPCP, 12 (14%) with CLT, and 4 (5%) with imiquimod. pCR was achieved in 34 patients (41%) overall, including 44% starting on IL-2, 20% on DPCP, 58% on CLT, and none on imiquimod (P = .024). With a median follow-up of 45 months, cumulative one-year overall survival was 86%, with the best survival in the CLT group. Forty-eight percent experienced common terminology criteria for adverse events grade 1 or 2 toxicity. A quarter of patients on DPCP discontinued therapy due to toxicity (P = .002). CONCLUSIONS: IL-2 may be considered for the treatment of ITM with multiple or rapidly developing lesions where there would otherwise be significant morbidity with surgery, given pCR rates and toxicity.

Topical immunotherapy with diphencyprone (DPCP) for in-transit and unresectable cutaneous melanoma lesions: an inaugural Canadian series.

BACKGROUND: Diphencycprone (DPCP) is an immune contact sensitizer applied to melanoma lesions. Early studies show favorable efficacy. We present the first North-American series of patients treated with DPCP. METHODS: A single center retrospective study of patients with in-transit or unresectable melanoma lesions treated with DPCP from December 1,2014 to December 31,2015 was completed. Primary objectives were response rate and toxicity. Secondary objective was health-related quality of life assessment with the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Melanoma (FACT-M) questionnaire. RESULTS: Fifteen consecutive patients were identified with median age of 78 (range 43-92). 73% of patients had prior treatment. Two patients (13%) had a complete response after 25 and 32 weeks, respectively. Four patients (27%) had a partial response with a mean treatment time of 30 weeks (range 6-51 weeks). Six (40%) had stable disease. Six patients stopped DPCP - three from systemic progression and three from toxicity. The most common toxicity was blisters; one patient had significant skin ulceration that resolved on stopping DPCP. Median FACT-M score was 142.95 (possible total 172). Mean overall follow-up time was 22.7 weeks. CONCLUSION: DPCP is a feasible option for in-transit and other melanoma cutaneous lesions ineligible/refractory to surgery and may delay need for systemic therapy.