Assessment of Treatment Outcomes in the Management of Club foot using the Ponseti Technique: A cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: The Ponseti technique remains the preferred method for club foot treatment. Although measures of treatment outcomes have been well documented, there is no consensus on the determinants of those outcomes. This study aims to assess treatment outcomes and the factors which can influence treatment outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a cross-sectional study. A total of 472 children representing 748 feet in total were recruited. Patient characteristics such as age at presentation, gender, tenotomy, walking with or without deformity, parental educational status and occupation were documented. Outcomes of care were assessed using indictors such as parents' satisfaction with the outcome of treatment and the patients' ambulation without deformity. The relationships between the determinant factors and these outcomes were explored using multivariable binary logistic regression. RESULTS: Most of the children (69.1%) were aged below 2 years. Brace compliance was very high (89.9%). The pre-treatment average Pirani scores were 3.9 ± 1.8 and 4.3 ± 1.8 for the right and left feet, respectively. Majority (88.3%) of the children achieved ambulation without deformity, whereas most (87%) of the parents were satisfied with the treatment outcomes. In total, parental satisfaction with child's treatment outcomes was lower in parents who were not formally educated odds ratio (OR) = 0.19 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.08-0.43), but parental satisfaction was lower if the child had higher Pirani score OR = 0.77 (95% CI 0.62-0.96). Children who had more casts applied to the affected foot were more likely to walk without deformity OR = 1.24 (95% CI 1.01-1.52). CONCLUSIONS: This study revealed that treatment outcomes in children with club foot can be determined by some sociodemographic and treatment-related factors.

Experience with accelerated ponseti technique for treatment of idiopathic clubfoot in a regional orthopaedic hospital in Nigeria.

Introduction: Idiopathic talipes equinovarus (ITEV) 'aka clubfoot' is the most common foot deformity in children. Ponseti technique had been accepted as a standard method for correction. The traditional Ponseti technique for correction is well known. Accelerated Ponseti technique is said to offer some advantages over the standard technique. The aim of this study was to determine and document the efficiency and success rate of accelerated Ponseti technique. Methods: This was a prospective interventional study which lasted 26 months from February 2017 to April 2019. Twenty-eight patients with 42 feets who met the inclusion criteria were recruited. They had serial manipulation and casting twice every week till percutaneous tenotomy was done as indicated. Final cast usually applied after tenotomy and left for 3weeks. Each patient was followed up for a year corresponding to 9 months after the commencement of night bracing. Data were analysed using SPSS version 20. Results: The mean age was 8.1 months with a range of 1-36 months. The mean Pirani score recorded was 4.4, while the mean number of casting sessions was 3.6 and the mean duration of treatment was 12.4 days. The tenotomy rate recorded was 42.9%. Pre-bracing assessment of Pirani score, passive ankle dorsiflexion and foot abduction done and repeated after a year revealed optimal correction. The relapsed rate at 1 year was 4.8%. The only complication observed was pressure sore in a patient. Conclusion: The accelerated Ponseti technique is an efficient method of treatment of ITEV in a much shorter time with a higher success rate. It facilitates compliance with treatment.

Reasons for Patronage of Traditional Bone Setters.

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study were to analyze the different reasons why patients with fractures patronize traditional bone setters (TBS) and their impression of the outcome of the treatment by the TBS. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A 24 month prospective observational study was conducted from February 2012 to January 2014. All the patients were recruited from the orthopedics outpatient clinic. The demographic data of each patient, the type of injury, presentation to hospital or not, reasons for leaving the hospital, reasons for patronage of the TBS and their impression of the outcome of TBS' treatment, effect of educational background on patronage of TBS and reason for presenting to hospital for orthodox treatment. DATA ANALYSIS: Analysis was done with SPSS software Version 20. RESULTS: A total 79 patients were recruited for the study and they had different reasons for patronizing TBS. These reasons include an external locus of decision making in 19 (24.1%) patients, and greater faith in TBS compared to orthodox medicine in 16 (20.3%). Twelve (15.2%) believed that TBS are more competent than orthodox medical practitioners while another group 11 (13.9%) considered the fees of TBS cheaper than those in the hospital. The delay in treatment in the hospital, forceful removal of patients from hospital against their will and nonsatisfaction with hospital treatment accounted for 5 (6.3%). Poor attitude of hospital staff, fear of amputation, and patients being unconscious during the injury accounted for 2 (2.5%). Their ages ranged from 17 to 83 years, with mean age of 36.8 ± 11.8 years. The male: female ratio was 1.5:1. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: With recent advancements in the practice of orthopedics and trauma, there is still a very high patronage of the TBS by most of our patients. This is largely due to the dependence of the patients on their sponsors for treatment, while the influence of cultural and religious beliefs continues to play a major role in these decisions.