RESUMO
Background: Measurement-based care (MBC) is an effective tool in the delivery of evidence-based practices (EBPs). MBC utilizes feedback loops to share information and drive changes throughout a learning healthcare system. Few studies have demonstrated this practice in team-based care for people with early psychosis. This paper describes the development of a personalized feedback report derived from routine assessments that is shared with clients and clinicians as part of a MBC process. Methods: We used a quasi pre-post comparison design with mixed methods to evaluate the implementation of a personalized feedback report at 5 early psychosis coordinated specialty care programs (CSC). We compared clients enrolled in CSC who did and did not receive a feedback report over the first 6 months of treatment. The sample included 204 clients: 146 who did not receive the feedback report and were enrolled over 2 years, and 58 who received the feedback report. A subset of 67 clients completed measures at both intake and 6-month follow-up, including 42 who received the report and 25 who did not. We compared the two groups with regard to self-reported symptoms, likelihood of completing treatment, and perception of shared decision making. We conducted qualitative interviews with 5 clients and 5 clinicians to identify the benefits and challenges associated with the personalized feedback report. Results: People who received a personalized feedback report reported significant improvements in shared decision-making and had greater improvements over time in their intent to attend future treatment sessions. They engaged in more sessions for Supported Employment and Education (SEE), case management, and peer support, and fewer medication visits over the first 6 months of treatment. Both groups showed significant improvement in symptoms and functioning. Results from the qualitative analysis indicated that the experience of receiving the reports was valuable and validating for both patients and clinicians. Conclusions: A personalized feedback report was integrated into standard of care for early psychosis programs. This process may improve shared decision-making, strengthen the likelihood to stay in treatment, and increase engagement in psychosocial interventions. We posit that this process facilitates strengths-focused discussions, enhances intrinsic motivation, and strengthens the therapeutic alliance.
RESUMO
Background: Suicide prevention public service announcements (PSAs) help to disseminate information about suicide and help-seeking options. However, little is known about how individuals at risk for suicide recall PSAs. Aims: The current project assessed which features of suicide prevention PSAs are recalled by young adult participants and whether there are differences between those who are at low or high risk for suicide. Method: Participants (N = 140) viewed a simulated suicide prevention billboard that consisted of a main message, help-seeking message, and graphical features. Participants provided written recollections of the billboard features approximately 15 min post-viewing, which were coded and analyzed. Results: High-risk participants were significantly less likely than low-risk participants to include a description of the help-seeking message in their written recall. Few group differences were noted in the recall of the main message or graphical features. Limitations: Recall was limited to short-term recall based on a single exposure. Efforts to enhance internal validity (e.g., measurement of suicide risk) and external validity (e.g., a balanced sample regarding sex and race) are recommended. Conclusions: Results suggest that new tactics may need to be considered when developing suicide prevention messages, including crafting help-seeking messages that are more easily committed to memory for target audiences.
