Left ventricular reverse remodelling predicts long-term outcomes in patients with functional mitral regurgitation undergoing MitraClip therapy: results from a multicentre registry.

AIMS: To explore whether left ventricular reverse remodelling (LVRR) is a predictor of outcomes in patients with functional mitral regurgitation (FMR) undergoing MitraClip procedure. METHODS AND RESULTS: We analysed 184 consecutive patients with FMR who underwent successful MitraClip procedure. LVRR was defined as a reduction in left ventricular end-systolic volume ≥ 10% from baseline to 6 months. LVRR was observed in 79 (42.9%) patients. Compared with non-LVRR, LVRR patients were more likely to be females, less likely to have an ischaemic aetiology of mitral regurgitation or a prior (<6 months) heart failure (HF) hospitalization, and had smaller left ventricular dimensions. New York Heart Association class improved from baseline up to 1-year follow-up in both groups. Higher rates of overall survival (87.3% vs. 75.2%, P = 0.039), freedom from HF hospitalization (77.2% vs. 60%, P = 0.020), and freedom from the composite endpoint (cardiovascular mortality or HF hospitalization) (74.7% vs. 55.2%; P = 0.012) were observed in LVRR vs. non-LVRR patients at 2-year follow-up. LVRR was associated with a significant reduction of the adjusted relative risk of mortality, HF hospitalization and composite endpoint [hazard ratio (HR) 0.44; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.20-0.96, P = 0.040; HR 0.55; 95% CI 0.32-0.97, P = 0.038; and HR 0.54; 95% CI 0.32-0.92, P = 0.023, respectively]. Female gender, absence of diabetes, freedom from prior HF hospitalization, non-ischaemic aetiology of mitral regurgitation, and left ventricular end-diastolic diameter < 75 mm were found to be independent predictors of LVRR. CONCLUSIONS: Left ventricular reverse remodelling is associated with better long-term outcomes in patients with FMR successfully treated with MitraClip. A careful patient selection may be useful as specific baseline features predict favourable left ventricular remodelling. [Correction added on 17 January 2019, after online publication: the preceding sentence has been changed.].

EkoSonic Endovascular System for patients with acute pulmonary embolism and contraindication to systemic fibrinolysis.

AIMS: The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the EkoSonic Endovascular System (EKOS) in patients with acute pulmonary embolism (APE) at high or intermediate-high risk and contraindication to systemic fibrinolysis. METHODS: This is a retrospective study including consecutive patients admitted due to high-risk or intermediate-high-risk APE and treated by EKOS because of an absolute or relative contraindication to systemic fibrinolysis. The primary efficacy end-point was the change from baseline to 72 h in right to left ventricular dimension ratio [right ventricular/left ventricular (RV/LV) ratio]; pulmonary embolic burden using the Qanadli Index; and systolic pulmonary arterial pressure (SPAP). The primary safety end-point was the occurrence of bleeding (GUSTO classification) within 72 h. RESULTS: Eighteen patients (5 men, 13 women; mean age 74 ±â€Š12.7 years) affected by high-risk APE (n = 5; 27.8%) or intermediate-high-risk APE (n = 13; 72.2%) were included. A significant reduction of mean RV/LV ratio (1.38 ±â€Š0.3 vs. 0.97 ±â€Š0.16; P < 0.0005); Qanadli Index [27.06 ±â€Š2.6 vs. 18.8 ±â€Š7.8 (P < 0.001) and SPAP (71.1 ±â€Š12 vs. 45.2 ±â€Š16 mmHg; P < 0.001)] was observed within 72 h after EKOS. Five bleeding events occurred: one fatal and four moderates; three out of them led to the access site hematoma, two due to pre-existing active bleeding. CONCLUSION: EKOS is an effective tool to treat patients with APE at high or intermediate-high risk and contraindication to fibrinolysis. It is a relatively safe therapy considering the critical conditions and high bleeding risk of the receiving population.