Novel guide device for temporomandibular joint arthroscopy.

Operative arthroscopy of the temporomandibular joint requires the insertion of an arthroscope and a working cannula. The surgical instruments are introduced into the joint space via the working cannula, and are visualized by the arthroscope. While the insertion of the arthroscope is relatively easy as anatomical landmarks such as the tragus-canthus line aid the surgeon, the insertion of the working cannula requires the use of advanced techniques and demands higher levels of surgical expertise. Following is a description of a novel guide device that enables the surgeon to introduce the working cannula into the desired location relative to the arthroscope, and maintains optimal spatial relations between them throughout the procedure.

Comparison of two physiotherapy programmes for rehabilitation after temporomandibular joint arthroscopy.

The purpose of this study was to compare two physiotherapy programmes for rehabilitation after temporomandibular joint (TMJ) arthroscopy. The medical files of 137 consecutive patients diagnosed with closed lock and treated by arthroscopic lysis and lavage were analyzed retrospectively. Sixty-eight patients were rehabilitated with gradually increasing range of motion self-exercises (gradual programme) and 69 patients were rehabilitated with immediate full range of motion self-exercises (immediate programme). The outcome variables were maximum mouth opening (MMO) and pain (on a visual analogue scale). The postoperative measurements taken at 1 month, 6 months, and last follow-up examination available (mean of 10 months postoperative) were analyzed and compared between the two groups. The results showed significantly better MMO and pain outcomes for the immediate group than for the gradual group at the 1-month and 6-month postoperative evaluations. The results of the two groups were comparable at the last follow-up examination available. It is concluded that after arthroscopic treatment of closed lock of the TMJ, a physiotherapy programme consisting of immediate postoperative full range of motion mobilizations achieves better results (in terms of pain and mouth opening) than a physiotherapy programme consisting of gradual and controlled increases in range of motion.

Localized myofascial pain responds better than referring myofascial pain to botulinum toxin injections.

Myofascial pain of the muscles of mastication is a common temporomandibular disorder. Patients unresponsive to conservative treatment modalities pose a therapeutic challenge to the treating clinician. The efficacy of intramuscular botulinum toxin injections for recalcitrant cases is still not well established due to mixed results from clinical trials. The Diagnostic Criteria of Temporomandibular Disorders (DC/TMD) classified chronic muscle pain broadly into a localized pattern (when pain is localized to the site of palpation or the muscle palpated) and a referring pattern (when the pain spreads beyond the boundary of the muscle being palpated). The medical records of 25 consecutive patients treated with botulinum were analysed retrospectively. Significant pain reduction was achieved in 69.2% of the patients with localized myofascial pain and 16.7% of the patients with referring myofascial pain (P=0.015). Seventy-seven per cent of the patients with localized myofascial pain reported using less analgesic throughout the follow-up period, whereas only 25% of the patients with referring myofascial pain (P=0.017). The effects of botulinum toxin in responsive patients subsided after a mean of 3.21 months. Patients with localized myofascial pain benefited from botulinum toxin injections, but patients with referring myofascial pain responded poorly to this treatment.