Polymeric Denture Base Materials: A Review.

An ideal denture base must have good physical and mechanical properties, biocompatibility, and esthetic properties. Various polymeric materials have been used to construct denture bases. Polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) is the most used biomaterial for dentures fabrication due to its favorable properties, which include ease of processing and pigmenting, sufficient mechanical properties, economy, and low toxicity. This article aimed to comprehensively review the current knowledge about denture base materials (DBMs) types, properties, modifications, applications, and construction methods. We searched for articles about denture base materials in PubMed, Scopus, and Embase. Journals covering topics including dental materials, prosthodontics, and restorative dentistry were also combed through. Denture base material variations, types, qualities, applications, and fabrication research published in English were considered. Although PMMA has several benefits and gained popularity as a denture base material, it has certain limitations and cannot be classified as an ideal biomaterial for fabricating dental prostheses. Accordingly, several studies have been performed to enhance the physical and mechanical properties of PMMA by chemical modifications and mechanical reinforcement using fibers, nanofillers, and hybrid materials. This review aimed to update the current knowledge about DBMs' types, properties, applications, and recent developments. There is a need for specific research to improve their biological properties due to patient and dental staff adverse reactions to possibly harmful substances produced during their manufacturing and use.

MicroCT evaluation for CAD/CAM occlusal veneer fit using two materials and three cement space settings.

This study was aimed to evaluate the fit of occlusal veneer restoration for two CAD/CAM materials with different cement space settings, using microCT scans. Sixty resin dies were made and divided into two groups (n=30) according to the materials, (I): Hybrid all-ceramic, and (II): zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate glass-ceramic. Each group was subdivided into three subgroups (n=10) according to the cement space parameters (30, 40, and 50 µm). Occlusal veneers for the six subgroups were milled. A circle with 20 different sections was placed at the center of every scanned specimen to measure four different locations (Occlusal, Axial, Marginal, and Absolute marginal discrepancy). Data were analyzed using two-way ANOVA at a 0.05 level of significance. There was no statistically significant effect of material type on the mean values of internal and marginal gaps for the three cement space parameters (P>0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in the occlusal and axial gap between the cement space parameters, furthermore, there were statistically significant differences in marginal gap distances and absolute marginal discrepancies (P>0.05). Hybrid all-ceramic showed smaller marginal and internal discrepancies than zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate glass-ceramic without statistically significant differences, and, for both materials, 50 µm cement space significantly improved the marginal fit and absolute marginal discrepancy.

MicroCT evaluation for CAD/CAM occlusal veneer fit using two materials and three cement space settings

Abstract This study was aimed to evaluate the fit of occlusal veneer restoration for two CAD/CAM materials with different cement space settings, using microCT scans. Sixty resin dies were made and divided into two groups (n=30) according to the materials, (I): Hybrid all-ceramic, and (II): zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate glass-ceramic. Each group was subdivided into three subgroups (n=10) according to the cement space parameters (30, 40, and 50 µm). Occlusal veneers for the six subgroups were milled. A circle with 20 different sections was placed at the center of every scanned specimen to measure four different locations (Occlusal, Axial, Marginal, and Absolute marginal discrepancy). Data were analyzed using two-way ANOVA at a 0.05 level of significance. There was no statistically significant effect of material type on the mean values of internal and marginal gaps for the three cement space parameters (P>0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in the occlusal and axial gap between the cement space parameters, furthermore, there were statistically significant differences in marginal gap distances and absolute marginal discrepancies (P>0.05). Hybrid all-ceramic showed smaller marginal and internal discrepancies than zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate glass-ceramic without statistically significant differences, and, for both materials, 50 µm cement space significantly improved the marginal fit and absolute marginal discrepancy.

Resumo Este estudo teve como objetivo avaliar o ajuste da restauração de facetas oclusais para dois materiais CAD/CAM com diferentes configurações de espaço de cimento, usando microCT. Foram feitos sessenta moldes de resina e divididos em dois grupos (n=30) de acordo com os materiais, (I): cerâmica pura híbrida, e (II): cerâmica de vidro de silicato de lítio reforçada com zircónia. Cada grupo foi subdividido em três subgrupos (n=10), de acordo com os parâmetros do espaço de cimento (30, 40, e 50 µm). As facetas oclusais para os seis subgrupos foram fresadas. Um círculo com 20 secções diferentes foi colocado no centro de cada amostra digitalizada para medir quatro locais diferentes (Oclusal, Axial, Marginal, e discrepância marginal absoluta). Os dados foram analisados utilizando ANOVA bidireccional a um nível de significância de 0,05. Não houve efeito estatisticamente significativo do tipo de material nos valores médios das aberturas internas e marginais para os três parâmetros do espaço de cimento (P>0,05). Não houve diferenças estatisticamente significativas no intervalo oclusal e axial entre os parâmetros do espaço de cimento, além disso, houve diferenças estatisticamente significativas nas distâncias do intervalo marginal e discrepâncias marginais absolutas (P>0,05). A cerâmica pura híbrida mostrou discrepâncias marginais e internas menores do que a cerâmica de vidro de silicato de lítio reforçada com zircónia sem diferenças estatisticamente significativas, e, para ambos os materiais, 50 µm de espaço de cimento melhoraram significativamente o ajuste marginal e a discrepância marginal absoluta.

Clinical performance of single implant-supported ceramic and metal-ceramic crowns: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Evidence relating to the choice of materials for single implant-supported crowns is sparse. PURPOSE: The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess articles that compared the clinical performance of ceramic and metal-ceramic (MC) implant-supported single crowns with regard to prosthesis failure, complication rate, and patient satisfaction. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A comprehensive search of databases (PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and Cochrane Library) was performed. The last search was conducted in December 2019. Randomized clinical trials comparing ceramic and MC implant-supported single crowns with at least a 12-month follow-up were included, all of which were published in English. The pooled effects were presented as both a risk difference (RD) and mean difference according to the type of data with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: Seven randomized clinical trials fulfilled the eligibility criteria and were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled data did not show any statistically significant differences concerning prosthesis failure (RD: 0.000, 95% CI: -0.05 to 0.06), marginal bone loss (mean difference [MD]: -0.02, 95% CI: -0.75 to 0.35), mechanical complications (RD: -0.06, 95% CI: -0.18 to 0.07), biological complications (RD: 0.02, 95% CI: -0.07 to 0.11), or patient satisfaction (MD: 4.86, 95% CI: -2.86 to 12.58). CONCLUSIONS: Ceramic and MC crowns had similar outcomes with regard to prosthesis failure, mechanical and biological complication rates, and patient satisfaction. As a result, the selection of single implant crown material depends on the preference of the dentist and patient.