Visual and Refractive Outcomes Following SMILE to Correct Myopia Performed by Surgeons in Training.

PURPOSE: To assess visual outcomes and complications following small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) performed by cornea fellows under the supervision of experienced surgeons. METHODS: This retrospective, noncomparative case series was designed to assess outcomes following SMILE procedures performed at a large surgical center by cornea fellows between May 1, 2012 and March 30, 2015. Preoperative and postoperative uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), preoperative and postoperative corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), spherical equivalent (SE) up to -10.00 diopters (D), and complications were recorded. RESULTS: A total of 114 patients (228 eyes) met the inclusion criteria. The mean preoperative SE was -5.79 ± 1.95 D (range: -1.75 to -10.00 D) and the mean cylinder was -2.21 ± 1.43 D (range: 0.00 to -5.50 D). At the last follow-up visit (average: 6.4 months), 94% of the patients achieved a UDVA of 20/30 or better and 96% of the patients achieved stability in their vision. Adverse events were encountered in 40 eyes (17.5%), with epithelial defect being the most common. Two patients required a second intervention to improve visual outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: SMILE performed by cornea fellows under the supervision of an experienced surgeon is an effective and safe refractive procedure with a short learning curve and excellent visual outcomes. [J Refract Surg. 2022;38(1):28-34.].

Cataract Following Pars Plana Vitrectomy: A Review.

Introduction: The indications for pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) have increased over the years. The vitreous is no longer considered an inert ocular structure and it is well known that its removal has anatomical and physiological consequences. The vitreous is no longer considered an inert ocular structure. The vitreous plays a key role as an intraocular physiologic oxygen regulator. In order to maintain its transparency, the crystalline lens needs protection from an excessive oxygen exposure. PPV leads to progression of nuclear sclerosis in most eyes.Methods: A systematic review of the literature was conducted using Embase and Medline databases. Articles studying the physiology, pathogenesis and surgical treatment of cataract after PPV were included in this review.Results: The pathogenesis of cataract formation after PPV remains unclear. Predisposing factors include advanced patient age, preexisting nuclear sclerosis, light toxicity, intraoperative oxidation of lens proteins, use of silicone oil or intravitreal gas, mechanical trauma and the duration of exposure to an irrigating solution.Conclusion: Cataract surgery in vitrectomized eyes presents with more technical difficulties, is more challenging and often has a higher risk of intraoperative and postoperative complications than in non vitrectomized eyes. There is no standardized technique or management in these cases; therefore, it requires more precautions during surgery.

Optimal management of pediatric keratoconus: challenges and solutions.

Keratoconus (KC) shows several distinctive features in clinical appearance, disease progression, and treatment in children compared with adults. Therefore, diagnostic, clinical care, and therapeutic approaches are different. However, pediatric keratoconus is often undiagnosed and thus untreated in many cases. Once diagnosis has been made, compliance with treatment recommendations is often poor. Pediatric keratoconus also tends to have more rapid progression than in adults; therefore, early detection and treatment are paramount to prevent serious vision impairment, which can affect the child's development. This review of pediatric keratoconus discusses important issues such as worldwide epidemiology, clinical features in children compared to adults, and challenges in diagnosis and treatment and focuses on the most appropriate management strategies based on the best available current evidence.

Trans-epithelial accelerated corneal cross-linking for keratoconus in children.

The aim of the study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of trans-epithelial accelerated corneal cross-linking (TE-ACXL) in children with progressive keratoconus. Retrospective, case-series of 23 eyes of 14 children who underwent TE-ACXL. Evaluations were performed at baseline and 1, 3, 6, 12 and 18mo postoperatively. Mean follow-up time of 23.82±3.15mo and mean age was 13.7±1.4y (range 11 to 16y). Mean preoperative uncorrected distance visual acuity changed from 0.92±0.45 logMAR (20/160) to 0.71±0.40 logMAR (20/100) (P=0.001). Mean keratometry (Km) changed from 53.87± 6.03 to 53.00±5.81 (P=0.001). Pachymetry did not have significant changes at last follow-up (P=0.30). The mean preoperative sphere was -5.58±2.48 and -4.89±4.66 D (P=0.11) at last follow-up; refractive cylinder from -5.58±2.48 to -5.02±2.23 (P=0.046). In conclusion, tomographic and refractive stability are shown in over 91% of eyes with pediatric progressive keratoconus who underwent TE-ACXL.

Scheimpflug and Optical Coherence Tomography Analysis of Posterior Keratoconus.

PURPOSE: To report a case series of 7 eyes of 6 patients with posterior keratoconus, evaluating corneal Scheimpflug tomographic changes and anterior-segment optical coherence tomography (OCT). METHODS: In our descriptive study, 6 patients were diagnosed with posterior keratoconus: 5 unilateral (7-, 33-, and 42-year-old males and 64- and 60-year-old female) and 1 bilateral (45-year-old female). Patients were diagnosed with slit-lamp examination, which revealed corneal opacity with an underlying posterior corneal depression. Additional analysis with anterior-segment OCT and Scheimpflug tomography evaluation was performed. RESULTS: Localized paracentral posterior keratoconus was diagnosed in 7 eyes. Scheimpflug images demonstrated posterior corneal depression. Clinical findings were examined by OCT. Genetic analysis revealed no alterations or associated syndromes. All patients were amblyopic in the affected eye, and no surgery was offered to improve their visual acuity. CONCLUSIONS: Posterior keratoconus is a rare noninflammatory condition usually present at birth and sometimes related to developmental abnormalities. Posterior keratoconus is usually unilateral and can present as a generalized or localized change in posterior corneal curvature.

Autologous simple limbal epithelial transplantation for unilateral limbal stem cell deficiency: multicentre results.

PURPOSE: To report outcomes of autologous simple limbal epithelial transplantation (SLET) performed for unilateral limbal stem cell deficiency (LSCD) at multiple centres worldwide. METHODS: In this retrospective, multicentre, interventional case series, records of patients who had undergone autologous SLET for unilateral LSCD, with a minimum of 6 months of follow-up, were reviewed. The primary outcome measure was clinical success, defined as a completely epithelised, avascular corneal surface. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were constructed and survival probability was calculated. A Cox proportional hazards analysis was done to assess association of preoperative characteristics with risk of failure. Secondary outcome measures included the percentage of eyes achieving visual acuity of 20/200 or better, percentage of eyes gaining two or more Snellen lines and complications encountered. RESULTS: 68 eyes of 68 patients underwent autologous SLET, performed across eight centres in three countries. Clinical success was achieved in 57 cases (83.8%). With a median follow-up of 12 months, survival probability exceeded 80%. Presence of symblepharon (HR 5.8) and simultaneous keratoplasty (HR 10.8) were found to be significantly associated with a risk of failure. 44 eyes (64.7%) achieved a visual acuity of 20/200 or better, and 44 eyes (64.7%) gained two or more Snellen lines. Focal recurrences of pannus were noted in 21 eyes (36.8%) with clinical success. CONCLUSION: Autologous SLET is an effective and safe modality for treatment of unilateral LSCD. Clinical success rates and visual acuity improvement are equal to or better than those reported with earlier techniques.

Combined small-incision lenticule extraction and intrastromal corneal collagen crosslinking to treat mild keratoconus: Long-term follow-up.

PURPOSE: To report visual, refractive, and topographic outcomes of sequential, same-day small-incision lenticule extraction and intrastromal corneal collagen crosslinking (CXL) in eyes with mild keratoconus. SETTING: Institute of Ophthalmology Conde de Valenciana, Mexico City, Mexico. DESIGN: Prospective interventional case series. METHODS: Fifteen eyes with forme fruste keratoconus and/or irregular corneas, corrected distance visual acuity 20/40 or better, stable refraction of at least 1 year, age 18 years or older, and residual corneal thickness of greater tan 400 µm before performing collagen crosslinking were studied. Patients were treated with small-incision lenticule extraction followed by intrastromal injection of riboflavin inside the pocket. Ultraviolet A light with a wavelength of 370 nm to 3 mW/cm(2) was applied for 30 minutes. Follow-up was done at 1 day, at 1 week, and at 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months. RESULTS: Eight patients were included in the study. The mean age was 29.5 years ± 5.5 (SD) (range 20 to 36 years). Twenty-four months of follow-up were completed in 13 eyes, and 12 months were completed in 2 eyes. Preoperative uncorrected distance visual acuity improved from 1.6 ± 0.3 LogMAR (Snellen 20/796) to postoperative 0.12 ± 0.20 LogMAR (Snellen 20/26) and was statistically significant (P < .001). Best-corrected distance visual acuity did not change significantly (P = .186), from 0.006 ± 0.02 LogMAR (Snellen 20/20) preoperatively to 0.04 ± 0.05 LogMAR (Snellen 20/21) postoperatively, and spherical equivalent improved from -4.3 ± 1.02 preoperatively to 0.2 ± 0.66 (P < .001). CONCLUSION: Although further follow-up and larger samples are needed to fully confirm these findings, the results suggest that combined small-incision lenticule extraction and intrastromal corneal collagen crosslinking are a promising treatment option for patients for whom conventional laser refractive surgery is contraindicated. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE: Drs. Ramirez-Miranda and Navas are consultants to Carl Zeiss Meditec. No other author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.