Ten years experience of corneal collagen cross-linking : An observational study of 6120 cases.

PURPOSE: To study the effect of corneal collagen cross-linking (CXL) using riboflavin and ultraviolet rays on cases of corneal ectasia in keratoconus cases, post-laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis ectasia, and pellucid marginal degeneration and to present its long-term results over many years. METHODS: This study was conducted throughout 10 "years" experience in corneal collagen CXL, including 6120 cases. The study consists of two parts: a retrospective and a prospective part. All patients in the retrospective part were operated by epi-off, while in the prospective part, the epi-on procedure was used. Also, other machines were used as Peschke Vario, Peschke Phoenix, and different types of riboflavin. The results were analyzed using SPSS. RESULTS: The study showed stabilization ectasia in 95% of cases using our standard protocol, and this was proved by topography, pachymetry, refraction, and visual acuity. The effect of CXL was continued in 20% of cases, over a period of 3-5 years, some cases needed to repeat CXL due to the progression of corneal ectasia after cross-linking, in six eyes, that were rubbing their eyes and/or hormonal disturbance. CONCLUSION: Corneal collagen cross-linking CXL is an effective method to prevent the progression of corneal ectasia, whether primary or post-laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis, and the effect was stable over the years of study.

Small Incision Lenticule Extraction for Postkeratoplasty Myopia and Astigmatism.

Purpose. To evaluate the visual and refractive outcomes after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) for treating myopia and myopic astigmatism after penetrating keratoplasty (PKP). Design. Case-series. Methods. Ten eyes of 10 patients with previous PKP and residual myopic astigmatism for whom pentacam imaging and thickness measurements were acceptable for laser vision correction. Manifest refraction (MR), uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), and corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) were obtained preoperatively and one day, one week, and one, 3, and 6 months postoperatively. Cases were operated on the VisuMax® femtosecond laser platform with 500 kHz repetition rate. Results. The mean correction ratio for spherical errors was 0.84 ± 0.19 D and for the mean refractive spherical equivalent (MRSE) was 0.79 ± 0.13 D. Vector analysis showed a mean astigmatism reduction at the intended axis of 67 ± 25.25%, a correction index of 0.81 ± 0.21, and an overall mean percentage of success of astigmatism surgery of 53 ± 37.9%. The postoperative MRSE was stable throughout the 6-month follow-up period. The efficacy index was 0.93 and the safety index was 1.12. Conclusion. SMILE for correction of post-PKP myopia and astigmatism is effective, safe, and stable with moderate accuracy and predictability. Centration of the treatment within the grafts was easily performed.

Contralateral Eye Comparison Between Femtosecond Small Incision Intrastromal Lenticule Extraction at Depths of 100 and 160 µm.

PURPOSE: To compare the visual results, higher-order aberrations, and corneal biomechanical properties of femtosecond small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) at depths of 100 and 160 µm. METHODS: A prospective comparative interventional clinical trial of a series of patients who underwent SMILE. In the right eye, a refractive lenticule was created at a depth of 100 µm, and in the left eye, a depth of 160 µm was used. Manifest refraction, uncorrected visual acuity, total high-order aberrations (THOA), and corneal biomechanical properties of both eyes were evaluated 1 month postoperatively. RESULTS: Thirty patients with bilaterally stable refractive errors were included in this study. One month postoperatively, mean corneal hysteresis was 9.71 ± 0.68 in the right eyes and 9.97 ± 0.77 in the left eyes, whereas the mean corneal resistant factor was 9.13 ± 1.04 and 9.31 ± 0.92 in the right and left eyes, respectively. Both corneal hysteresis and corneal resistant factor showed statistically significantly higher values in the left eyes (lenticule at a depth of 160 µm). No statistically significant differences were found between the right and the left eyes regarding manifest refraction, uncorrected visual acuity, and THOA. CONCLUSIONS: Creating the refractive lenticule at a depth of 160 µm in SMILE had less effect on the corneal biomechanics than did creating a lenticule at a depth of 100 µm with no statistically significant differences in the refractive outcome and THOA between both groups.