Feasibility of Goal Attainment Scaling as a patient-reported outcome measure for older patients in primary care.

BACKGROUND: Goal Attainment Scaling (GAS) is an outcome measure that reflects the perspectives and experiences of patients, consistent with patient-centred care approaches and with the aims of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). GAS has been used in a variety of clinical settings, including in geriatric care, but research on its feasibility in primary care practice has been limited. The time required to complete GAS is a barrier to its use by busy primary care clinicians. In this study, we explored the feasibility of lay interviewers completing GAS with older primary care patients. METHODS: Older adults were recruited from participants of a larger study in five primary care clinics in Alberta and Ontario, Canada. GAS guides were developed based on semi-structured telephone interviews completed by a non-clinician lay interviewer; goals were reviewed in a follow-up interview after six months. RESULTS: Goal-setting interviews were conducted with 41 participants. GAS follow-up guides could be developed for 40 patients (mean of two goals/patient); follow-up interviews were completed with 29 patients. Mobility-focused goals were the most common goal areas identified. CONCLUSIONS: Study results suggest that it is feasible for lay interviewers to conduct GAS over the telephone with older primary care patients. This study yielded an inventory of patient goal areas that could be used as a starting point for future goal-setting interviews in primary care. Recommendations are made for use of GAS and for future research in the primary care context.

The Impact of COVID-19 on Older Adults' Perceptions of Virtual Care: Qualitative Study.

BACKGROUND: In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, older adults worldwide have increasingly received health care virtually, and health care organizations and professional bodies have indicated that virtual care is "here to stay." As older adults are the highest users of the health care system, virtual care implementation can have a significant impact on them and may pose a need for additional support. OBJECTIVE: This research aims to understand older adults' perspectives and experiences of virtual care during the pandemic. METHODS: As part of a larger study on older adults' technology use during the pandemic, we conducted semistructured interviews with 20 diverse older Canadians (mean age 76.9 years, SD 6.5) at 2 points: summer of 2020 and winter/early spring of 2021. Participants were asked about their technology skills, experiences with virtual appointments, and perspectives on this type of care delivery. Interviews were digitally recorded and transcribed. A combination of team-based and framework analyses was used to interpret the data. RESULTS: Participants described their experiences with both in-person and virtual care during the pandemic, including issues with accessing care and long gaps between appointments. Overall, participants were generally satisfied with the virtual care they received during the pandemic. Participants described the benefits of virtual care (eg, increased convenience, efficiency, and safety), the limitations of virtual care (eg, need for physical examination and touch, lack of nonverbal communication, difficulties using technology, and systemic barriers in access), and their perspectives on the future of virtual care. Half of our participants preferred a return to in-person care after the COVID-19 pandemic, while the other half preferred a combination of in-person and virtual services. Many participants who preferred to access in-person services were not opposed to virtual care options, as needed; however, they wanted virtual care as an option alongside in-person care. Participants emphasized a need for training and support to be meaningfully implemented to support both older adults and providers in using virtual care. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, our research identified both perceived benefits and perceived limitations of virtual care, and older adult participants emphasized their wish for a hybrid model of virtual care, in which virtual care is viewed as an addendum, not a replacement for in-person care. We recognize the limitations of our sample (small, not representative of all older Canadians, and more likely to use technology); this body of literature would greatly benefit from more research with older adults who do not/cannot use technology to receive care. Findings from this study can be mobilized as part of broader efforts to support older patients and providers engaged in virtual and in-person care, particularly post-COVID-19.