Split daily recombinant human LH dose in hypogonadotrophic hypogonadism: a nonrandomized controlled pilot study.

This prospective controlled nonrandomized pilot study was conducted to investigate whether split daily doses of recombinant human LH (rHLH) is more efficacious than the single daily dose in supporting follicular development and ovulation in primary hypogonadotrophic hypogonadism (HH). Twenty-seven women with HH received a 150 IU fixed daily subcutaneous dose of recombinant human FSH, supplemented by 75 IU daily dose of rHLH given either as a single dose (n=9; single-dose group) or four equally divided doses (n=18; split-dose group). Ovulation was defined by three efficacy end points: at least one follicle ⩾17mm in diameter, pre-ovulatory serum oestradiol ⩾400pmol/l and a midluteal progesterone ⩾25nmol/l. Although lacking statistical significance, the proportion of women in the rHLH split-dose group who fulfilled all three end points was higher than the single-dose group (72.2% versus 55.6%). Women in the split-dose group achieved higher serum oestradiol concentrations per follicle, endometrial thickness measurements and numbers of follicles than in the single-dose group (not statistically significant). The odds ratio for ovulation rate was 2.08 (not statistically significant). There were no serious untoward side effects. Administering rHLH in split daily doses could provide superior results compared with the traditional single daily dose. We conducted this clinical study to investigate whether a split daily dose protocol of recombinant human LH (rHLH) is more efficacious than the single daily dose in supporting follicular development and ovulation in primary hypogonadotrophic hypogonadism (HH). HH is an uncommon entity that can lead to very low or undetectable serum gonadotrophin concentrations. It manifests in anovulation, amenorrhoea and subsequent infertility. Twenty-seven women with HH received a 150 IU fixed daily subcutaneous dose of recombinant human FSH, supplemented by a 75 IU daily dose of rHLH given either as a single dose (n=9; single-dose group) or four equally divided doses (n=18; split-dose group). Ovulation was defined by these three efficacy end points: at least one follicle ⩾17mm in mean diameter, pre-ovulatory serum oestradiol concentration ⩾400pmol/l and a midluteal progesterone concentration ⩾25nmol/l. The proportion of women in the rHLH split-dose group who fulfilled all three end points was higher than the single-dose group (72.2% versus 55.6%). Women in the split-dose group achieved higher serum oestradiol concentrations per follicle, endometrial thickness measurements and numbers of follicles than in the single-dose group, without statistical significance. Women who received the split-dose regimen were more likely to have ovulation than the other group. We had no serious problematic side effects. Our results suggest that administering rHLH in split daily doses could provide superior results compared to the traditional single daily dose.

Fever in women may interfere with follicular development during controlled ovarian stimulation.

PURPOSE: This study aims to evaluate the effects of fever on follicular development in women undergoing controlled ovarian stimulation during in vitro fertilisation (IVF) and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective observational self-controlled study at a tertiary-care fertility centre. Six gonadotropin stimulation cycles characterised by poor ovarian response in which women reported the occurrence of a febrile illness, were considered for evaluation. Fever-exposed cycles were compared to the next stimulation cycle in the same women. Primary outcome measures were final number of pre-ovulatory follicles (≥ 16 mm) and final peak serum estradiol levels (pg/mL). Other outcome measures were final number of medium-sized follicles (12-15 mm), final mean estradiol serum level per follicle ≥ 12 mm (pg/mL), total days of stimulation and total gonadotropin ampoules utilised. RESULTS: Fever-exposed cycles were associated with significantly lower number of pre-ovulatory follicles (0.7 ± 0.8), significantly higher number of medium-size follicles (21.0 ± 4.5), and significantly reduced serum estradiol per follicle ≥12 mm (50.7 ± 11.7 pg/mL). They also required a significantly longer duration of ovarian stimulation (15.7 ± 3.3 days) and a significantly increased number of gonadotropin ampoules (47.2 ± 10.9). Four women had polycystic ovary syndrome and one hypothalamic hypogonadism. CONCLUSION: This preliminary report suggests a possible negative effect of fever on follicular development and ovarian estradiol production in some women undergoing controlled ovarian stimulation.