Hemodynamic and humoral effects of low-dose aspirin in treated and untreated essential hypertensive patients.

Aspirin at low doses is used as an inhibitor of platelet aggregation and is frequently administered to essential hypertensive patients with arterial thrombotic complications. However, it is unknown whether aspirin can modify blood pressure values either in treated or untreated hypertensive patients, as described for other non steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Thus 30 patients. 10 with mild uncomplicated and untreated essential hypertension, 10 with essential hypertension under chronic treatment with captopril, 50 mg bid, and 10 with essential hypertension under chronic treatment with atenolol, 100 mg oid, received aspirin, 100 mg oid, and the corresponding placebo for one month, according to a double blind randomized cross-over design. At the end of each treatment, blood pressure, heart rate, generated serum thromboxane B2 and urinary excretion of thromboxane B2 and 6 keto prostaglandin F1 alpha and plasma renin activity were measured. Both in treated and untreated essential hypertensive patients, aspirin administration did not affect blood pressure, heart rate and urinary 6 keto prostaglandin F1 alpha, while it significantly reduced serum and urinary excretion of thromboxane B2 and plasma renin activity. In conclusion, while the present data confirm that low doses of aspirin selectively inhibit thromboxane B2 synthesis, they indicate that aspirin at 100 mg oid can be administered to treated and untreated essential hypertensive patients without any harmful effect on blood pressure values.

Indirect evidence for vascular uptake of circulating renin in hypertensive patients.

To evaluate whether, in the forearm of hypertensive patients with different circulating renin profiles, local beta-adrenergic receptor-induced production of active renin, plasma renin activity, angiotensin I (Ang I), and angiotensin II (Ang II) was or was not related to the renin profile, we studied four groups of patients: 1) hypertensive patients with primary aldosteronism and suppressed circulating plasma renin activity values (0.15 +/- 0.1 ng Ang I/mL per hour; n = 7), 2) essential hypertensive patients with low (0.47 +/- 0.1 ng Ang I/mL per hour; n = 8) circulating plasma renin activity values, 3) essential hypertensive patients with normal (2.48 +/- 0.52 ng Ang I/mL per hour; n = 8) circulating plasma renin activity value, and 4) renovascular hypertensive patients with high circulating plasma renin activity values (4.16 +/- 2.1 ng Ang I/mL per hour; n = 10). Isoproterenol was infused into the brachial artery, and active renin, plasma renin activity, and Ang I and Ang II forearm balance (venous-arterial differences corrected for forearm blood flow by strain-gauge plethysmography) were measured. Despite a comparable vasodilation, beta-adrenergic stimulation failed to release active renin, plasma renin activity, and Ang I and Ang II in primary aldosteronism. It slightly increased them (except for Ang I) in low renin patients but determined a local production in normal renin and renovascular hypertensive patients. The individual increments in plasma renin activity and Ang II release induced by isoproterenol showed a correlation with the renin profile.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Hemodynamic and humoral interactions between perindopril and indomethacin in essential hypertensive subjects.

To evaluate whether perindopril, a carboxyl-containing new angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor, exerts its antihypertensive action through the stimulation of prostaglandin synthesis, 10 uncomplicated essential hypertensive patients randomly received indomethacin (50 mg b.i.d.) or the corresponding placebo for 1 week and the reverse treatment after 2 weeks. Perindopril alone tended to reduce serum and urinary thromboxane B2 (TxB2) and to raise urinary 6-ketoPGF1 alpha and PGE2 and inhibited serum ACE activity 24 h post dosing by about 85%. Indomethacin, which significantly inhibited serum TxB2 and urinary TxB2, 6-ketoPGF1 alpha, and PGE2 without interfering with the inhibitory effect of perindopril on ACE, significantly reduced the antihypertensive action of perindopril alone by about 30%, but decreased though not significantly that of perindopril plus placebo. Although the size of the study limits the interpretation, these findings suggest that the stimulation of prostaglandin synthesis plays only a minor role in the antihypertensive action of perindopril.

Nifedipine interactions in hypertensive patients.

Nifedipine interactions in hypertensive patients have been evaluated, taking into account both the possibility that the inhibition of prostaglandin (PG) synthesis induced by non-steroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) can reduce the antihypertensive effect of nifedipine and the interactions of nifedipine with other antihypertensive drugs. While the inhibition of systemic and renal PG synthesis induced by indomethacin reduces the hypertensive effect of many drugs, it does not change the antihypertensive effect of nifedipine. The combination of two antihypertensive drugs with different mechanisms of action is often needed in the treatment of hypertensives, since it is well known that monotherapy is able to normalize BP in no more than 50% of mild to moderate hypertensives, and the rationale to combine two antihypertensive agents is based on the knowledge that their combination exerts an additive antihypertensive effect when compared with single-drug treatment. While it is well established that nifedipine can be usefully combined with beta blockers, ACE inhibitors, and clonidine, it is still controversial whether the combination of nifedipine with a thiazide diuretic exerts an additional antihypertensive effect. We have previously shown that the acute hypotensive effect of nifedipine in patients with chronic renal failure is greater during sodium repletion than during sodium depletion, and that chlorthalidone, compared with placebo, does not increase the hypotensive effect of nifedipine in essential hypertensives.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

The interference of indomethacin and of imidazole salicylate on blood pressure control of essential hypertensive patients treated with atenolol. Preliminary report.

To evaluate whether imidazole salicylate, a recently developed NSAID, can interfere with the antihypertensive effect of atenolol and to compare its action with that of indomethacin, 9 essential hypertensives, while on prolonged (more than 1 month) treatment with atenolol (100 mg qd) received, according to a double-blind cross-over study, imidazole salicylate (750 mg t.i.d.) or indomethacin (50 mg b.i.d. plus a placebo tablet) for 1 week, reverting the treatment after a 2-week wash-out period. While indomethacin addition significantly increased blood pressure, when compared to atenolol alone, imidazole salicylate did not change it. These data show that imidazole salicylate, unlike indomethacin, does not reduce the antihypertensive effect of atenolol.

Acute hemodynamic effect of nifedipine in hypertensives with chronic renal failure: the influence of volume status.

To study the influence of sodium on the antihypertensive effect of a calcium entry blocker (CEB), 11 hypertensives with chronic renal failure (CRF), whose blood pressure was uncontrolled by hemodialysis, randomly received nifedipine (10 mg p.o.) or the corresponding placebo before and after dialysis, reversing the sequence the next week. Dialysis induced a similar sodium loss during the two experimental periods (-339.0 +/- 26.7 vs. -348.8 +/- 26.4 mEq) and did not significantly change blood pressure. When compared with placebo, nifedipine significantly (p less than 0.05 or less) reduced mean blood pressure and increased heart rate both before and after dialysis, with a peak effect at the first hour. However, both absolute and percentage decrements of mean blood pressure induced by nifedipine before dialysis were significantly (p less than 0.05 or less) greater than those after dialysis. These data indicate that the acute hypotensive effect of nifedipine is greater during sodium repletion than during sodium depletion, a finding that suggests a positive interaction between sodium and the antihypertensive action of CEBs.

Indomethacin reduces the antihypertensive action of enalapril.

We evaluated the influence of indomethacin on the pharmacological actions of Enalapril in 9 uncomplicated essential hypertensives. While on chronic treatment with Enalapril, these patients randomly received indomethacin (50 mg bid) or a corresponding placebo for 1 week and the opposite treatment after a 2 week interval. Indomethacin, which decreased serum thromboxane B2 and urinary 6-keto prostaglandin-F1 alpha, reduced the plasma renin activity (PRA) increased by Enalapril. Indomethacin did not modify serum ACE, whose activity had been reduced by the ACE inhibitor. Mean blood pressure (MBP) values, which were significantly and to a similar extent reduced by Enalapril at the beginning of the cross-over, after placebo addition and at the end of the two week interval, were significantly increased by indomethacin, despite being still significantly lower than baseline values. These data show that systemic and renal prostaglandin (PG) synthesis inhibition induced by indomethacin can blunt the antihypertensive effect of chronic Enalapril treatment in patients with essential hypertension.

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors in hypertension: a review.

Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors are a new class of drugs, whose main indications are the treatment of hypertension and of heart failure. Data obtained with captopril, the first orally active ACE inhibitor, affords an understanding of the rationale of their therapeutic use based on the knowledge of their mechanisms of action, efficacy, contraindications and precautions, dosage and frequency of administration, side-effects, interactions and advantages. ACE inhibitors appear to exert their haemodynamic effect mainly by inhibiting the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, but also by modulating sympathetic nervous system activity and by increasing prostaglandin synthesis. Therefore they act both on vasoconstrictor and volume factors, since they cause vasodilation (the main effect) and mild natriuresis without affecting the heart rate and contractility and, probably, favourably influencing renal, coronary and cerebral circulation. So far it appears that ACE inhibitors can be usefully employed in the treatment of heart failure, in which they reduce both pre- and after-load, and mainly of hypertension. In the past captopril has been used to treat only severe and or resistant hypertension and some secondary forms, like renal parenchymal and renovascular hypertension, but now it seems that captopril is useful also to treat mild to moderate essential hypertension. Their efficacy in reducing blood pressure is similar to that of thiazide diuretics and of beta-blockers, the two drugs now considered of first choice and they exert their hypotensive action without the development of pseudotolerance or tolerance. ACE inhibitors seem, at the moment, contraindicated in pregnancy and in hyperkalaemic syndromes and must be used with caution in patients with collagen disease (mainly associated with renal failure), with severe bilateral renal artery stenosis (and with severe artery stenosis of a solitary kidney) and with severe sodium depletion. It is now established that captopril has a flat dose response curve and that it must be given (twice daily) at a dose not exceeding 150 mg/day. The same pharmacological approach must be used with future ACE inhibitors in order to establish the right posology and the frequency of administration. In this respect enalapril seems to be a promising ACE inhibitor with a prolonged action (at least 24 hours). The exact posology of ACE inhibitors might be crucial, since it has been shown that the side-effects of captopril (skin rashes, fever, taste disturbances, proteinuria and neutropenia) are dose dependent.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

The influence of selective and nonselective prostaglandin inhibition on renin.

The finding that sulindac, in contrast to indomethacin, does not inhibit renal prostaglandins (PGs) can offer the means to study the role of systemic and/or renal PGs in the control of renin. Therefore we studied, using a randomized cross-over design, the influence of treatment with sulindac and indomethacin on plasma renin activity (PRA) of essential hypertensive patients, which was measured either after standing or after chronic captopril and chlorthalidone administration. In the captopril-treated group, serum thromboxane B2 (TXB2) and urinary 6-keto-PGF1alpha were significantly reduced by indomethacin, while sulindac reduced only serum TXB2. PRA was significantly reduced by indomethacin in the three groups and by sulindac only in standing and captopril-treated patients. These findings suggest that systemic PGs are mainly involved in the control of renin during standing and angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibition, while mainly renal PGs play a role in the control of renin during chronic thiazide-like diuretic administration.

Influence of food on acute and chronic effects of captopril in essential hypertensive patients.

To determine if food reduces the hemodynamic and humoral effects of captopril in patients with essential hypertension, we performed two studies. In the acute study, 15 inpatients with uncomplicated essential hypertension randomly received a single oral dose of placebo or captopril (25 mg) while fasting or after eating, or captopril (50 mg) after eating. Blood pressure and heart rate were measured every 30 min up to 4 h (and up to 10 h in six out of the 15 patients), while plasma renin activity, plasma aldosterone, and serum angiotensin-converting enzyme were measured 2 h after dosing. Compared with placebo, captopril significantly reduced mean blood pressure (p less than 0.001), serum angiotensin-converting enzyme (p less than 0.005), and aldosterone (p less than 0.001), increased plasma renin activity (p less than 0.05), and did not change heart rate; there was no difference between the fasting and the fed state. In the six patients followed up to 10 h, captopril both before and after food significantly and similarly reduced mean blood pressure up to 8 h (p less than or equal to 0.05). In the chronic study, 10 patients with uncomplicated essential hypertension, while having prolonged (3-12 months) treatment with captopril (50 mg twice a day), were asked to take captopril for 1 month 1 h before eating and for another month during or immediately after eating. The sequence was randomized, and blood pressure, heart rate, plasma renin activity, serum angiotensin-converting enzyme, and plasma aldosterone were measured at the end of each period 12 h after last dosing.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Dose-response relationship of prizidilol hydrochloride (SK&F 92657): a comparison between acute and chronic effects in patients with essential hypertension.

Three different doses (50, 100 and 200 mg) of prizidilol hydrochloride (SK&F 92657), a novel antihypertensive agent with vasodilating and beta-adrenoreceptor blocking properties, were given to three (n = 5) groups of essential hypertensive patients in order to evaluate hypotensive dose-response relationship of the drug and its beta-adrenoreceptor blocking properties. Irrespective of the dose given, acute administration of prizidilol did not effectively decrease blood pressure; however after one-week of treatment prizidilol was effective in reducing blood pressure at both the 100 and the 200 mg b.i.d. schedules. At these doses the drug decreased resting heart rate and plasma renin activity for the first 4-6 h after both acute and steady-state dosing. Similarly postdynamic exercise tachycardia was reduced to a significant extent by the drug; after acute administration this effect lasted 2 h with the lowest dose and 4 h with the highest one. After chronic administration this effect lasted up to 10 h for both the 100 and 200 mg doses. These data indicate that: chronic prizidilol treatment can achieve a satisfactory control of blood pressure in patients with mild-moderate essential hypertension; when prizidilol is administered chronically in hypertensive patients, an equally effective control of blood pressure can be obtained with either a 200 mg b.i.d. or a 100 mg b.i.d. schedule; prizidilol possesses beta-adrenoceptor blocking properties in man which can contribute to its pharmacodynamic activity.

The influence of indomethacin and sulindac on some pharmacological actions of atenolol in hypertensive patients.

Indomethacin and sulindac were used as tools to study the role of renal and/or systemic prostaglandins in the pharmacological response to atenolol. Patients receiving chronic treatment with atenolol 100 mg received indomethacin 50 mg twice daily or sulindac 200 mg twice daily in a randomised crossover trial. Indomethacin significantly reduced the antihypertensive action of atenolol while sulindac had no effect. The role that systemic and/or renal prostaglandins may play in the antihypertensive action of atenolol is discussed with reference to renal PGI2 production and inhibition of platelet cyclo-oxygenase.

Humoral and hemodynamic effects of increasing doses of captopril in patients with essential hypertension.

To compare the hemodynamic and humoral effects of increasing doses of captopril, blood pressure, heart rate, plasma renin activity, plasma aldosterone and angiotensin-converting enzyme activity were measured in 10 patients with mild uncomplicated essential hypertension before and after captopril given in an increasing dose of 25, 50 and 100 mg twice a day, with each dose given for 3 days. The maximal decrease in blood pressure, which was predicted both by basal plasma renin activity values and by the hypotensive response to the first dose, was found after the lowest (25 mg) dose; this effect was detectable for 12 hours independently of the dose administered. Similarly, plasma renin activity was already maximally increased and plasma aldosterone maximally decreased at the lowest dose, while angiotensin-converting enzyme activity showed a dose-dependent inhibition. These data suggest that (1) neither the magnitude nor the duration of the hypotensive effect nor the resin-stimulating and aldosterone-inhibiting actions of captopril are enhanced by drug doses above 25 mg (at least up to 100 mg), and (2) there was no apparent correlation between the degree of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition with increasing doses of captopril and the hypotensive effects of the drug.