Head-to-Head Comparison of T1 Mapping and Electroanatomical Voltage Mapping in Patients With Ventricular Arrhythmias.

BACKGROUND: Electroanatomical voltage mapping (EAVM) has been compared with late gadolinium enhancement cardiovascular magnetic resonance (LGE-CMR), which cannot delineate diffuse fibrosis. T1-mapping CMR overcomes the limitations of LGE-CMR, but it has not been directly compared against EAVM. OBJECTIVES: This study aims to assess the relationship between left ventricular (LV) endocardial voltage obtained by EAVM and extracellular volume (ECV) obtained by T1 mapping. METHODS: The study investigated patients who underwent endocardial EAVM for ventricular arrhythmias (CARTO 3, Biosense Webster) together with preprocedural contrast-enhanced T1 mapping (Ingenia 3T, Philips Healthcare). After image integration, EAVM datapoints were projected onto LGE-CMR and ECV-encoded images. Average values of unipolar voltage (UV), bipolar voltage (BV), LGE transmurality, and ECV were merged from corresponding cardiac segments (6 per slice) and pooled for analysis. RESULTS: The analysis included data from 628 segments from 18 patients (57 ± 13 years of age, 17% females, LV ejection fraction 48% ± 14%, nonischemic/ischemic cardiomyopathy/controls: 8/6/4 patients). Based on the 95th and 5th percentile values obtained from the controls, ECV >33%, BV <2.9 mV, and UV <6.7 mV were considered abnormal. There was a significant inverse association between voltage and ECV, but only in segments with abnormal ECV. Increased ECV could predict abnormal BV and UV with acceptable accuracy (area under the curve of 0.78 [95% CI: 0.74-0.83] and 0.84 [95% CI: 0.79-0.88]). CONCLUSIONS: This study found a significant inverse relationship between LV endocardial voltage and ECV. Real-time integration of T1 mapping may guide catheter mapping and may allow identification of areas of diffuse fibrosis potentially related to ventricular arrhythmias.

Accuracy of electroanatomical mapping-guided cardiac radiotherapy for ventricular tachycardia: pitfalls and solutions.

AIMS: To analyse and optimize the interobserver agreement for gross target volume (GTV) delineation on cardiac computed tomography (CCT) based on electroanatomical mapping (EAM) data acquired to guide radiotherapy for ventricular tachycardia (VT). METHODS AND RESULTS: Electroanatomical mapping data were exported and merged with the segmented CCT using manual registration by two observers. A GTV was created by both observers for predefined left ventricular (LV) areas based on preselected endocardial EAM points indicating a two-dimensional (2D) surface area of interest. The influence of (interobserver) registration accuracy and availability of EAM data on the final GTV and 2D surface location within each LV area was evaluated. The median distance between the CCT and EAM after registration was 2.7 mm, 95th percentile 6.2 mm for observer #1 and 3.0 mm, 95th percentile 7.6 mm for observer #2 (P = 0.9). Created GTVs were significantly different (8 vs. 19 mL) with lowest GTV overlap (35%) for lateral wall target areas. Similarly, the highest shift between 2D surfaces was observed for the septal LV (6.4 mm). The optimal surface registration accuracy (2.6 mm) and interobserver agreement (Δ interobserver EAM surface registration 1.3 mm) was achieved if at least three cardiac chambers were mapped, including high-quality endocardial LV EAM. CONCLUSION: Detailed EAM of at least three chambers allows for accurate co-registration of EAM data with CCT and high interobserver agreement to guide radiotherapy of VT. However, the substrate location should be taken in consideration when creating a treatment volume margin.

New Adjusted Cutoffs for "Normal" Endocardial Voltages in Patients With Post-Infarct LV Remodeling.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to determine new reference cutoffs for normal unipolar voltage (UV) and bipolar voltage (BV) that would be adjusted for the LV remodeling. BACKGROUND: The definition of "normal" left ventricular (LV) endocardial voltage in patients with post-infarct scar is still lacking. The reference voltage of the noninfarcted myocardium (NIM) may differ between patients depending on LV structural remodeling and the ensuing interstitial fibrosis. METHODS: Electroanatomic voltage mapping was integrated with isotropic late gadolinium-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance in 15 patients with nonremodeled LV and 12 patients with remodeled LV (end-systolic volume index >50 ml/m2 with ejection fraction <47% assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance). Reference voltages (fifth percentile values) were determined from pooled NIM segments without late gadolinium enhancement. RESULTS: The cutoffs for normal BV and UV were ≥3.0 and ≥6.7 mV for nonremodeled LV and ≥2.1 and ≥6.4 mV for remodeled LV. Endocardial low-voltage area (LVA) defined by the adjusted cutoffs corresponded better to late gadolinium enhancement-detected scar than did LVA defined by uniform cutoffs. In 15 patients who underwent successful ablation of ventricular tachycardia, the LVA contained >97% of targeted evoked delayed potentials. Insights from whole-heart T1 mapping revealed more fibrotic NIM in patients with remodeled LV compared with nonremodeled LV. CONCLUSIONS: This study found substantial differences in endocardial voltage of NIM in post-infarct patients with remodeled versus nonremodeled LV. The new adjusted cutoffs for "normal" BV and UV enable a patient-tailored approach to electroanatomic voltage mapping of LV.