Urinary Neutrophil Gelatinase-Associated Lipocalin in Cirrhotic Patients with Acute Kidney Injury.

INTRODUCTION AND AIM: It is well known that development of acute kidney injury (AKI) increases mortality in hospitalized cirrhotic patients; therefore many novel markers have been studied for early detection, differential diagnosis and prognosis in cirrhotic patients with AKI. The aim of the current work is to evaluate urinary Neutrophil Gelatinase-Associated Lipocalin (uNGAL) as a diagnostic biomarker for different causes of acute kidney injury in liver cirrhosis and to assess it as a prognostic marker. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Out of 83 cirrhotic patients with AKI admitted between October 2015 and June 2016; 70 patients were included in this prospective study. Routine laboratory tests, uNGAL and fractional excretion of Na were obtained on admission. End points were death or improvement of kidney function and discharge. RESULTS: The patients included in our study were 41 males and 29 females with mean age 54.27 ± 6.08 years. HCV was the etiology of cirrhosis in 69 cases while one had combined HBV and HCV infection. More than 50% of patients were classified as Child C. Causes of kidney injury were prerenal, hepatorenal syndrome (HRS) and intrinsic tubular injury (iAKI) in 39 patients (55.7%), 17 patients (24.3%) and 14 patients (20%) respectively. mean value of uNGAL in prerenal, HRS and iAKI was 21.70 ± 7.31, 115.53 ± 68.19 and 240.83 ± 116.94 ng/mg creatinine respectively. MELD above 20 and uNGL above 32 were predictors of mortality. CONCLUSION: A single baseline measurement of uNGAL level has the ability to determine type of kidney dysfunction in cirrhotic patients, perhaps accelerating management decisions and improving outcomes.

Role of endoscopic ultrasound and endoscopic-ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration in endoscopic biopsy negative gastrointestinal lesions.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Many cases of gastrointestinal (GI) tumors as lymphoma, adenocarcinoma, and most of submucosal tumors (SMT) such as gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) and leiomyoma are difficult to diagnose as they frequently yield negative endoscopic biopsies. We evaluated the accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) in the diagnosis of endoscopic biopsy negative GI tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred and nine patients with biopsy negative GI tumors were included in this prospective study. EUS and EUS-FNA were performed to all patients with cytopathologic examination. RESULTS: There were 109 patients with endoscopic biopsy negative GI lesions, including 61 males (56%) and 48 females (44%), with the mean age of 54 years. Sixty-three cases (57.8%) were proved to have malignant lesions, among them there were 15 cases with high-risk GIST as proved by FNA and excision biopsy. Forty-six cases (42.2%) were proved to be benign; among them there were 21 cases presented with non-high-risk GIST. Endoscopic ultrasound had a sensitivity of 96.8%, specificity of 89.1%, positive predictive value (PPV) of 92.4%, negative predictive value (NPV) of 95.3%, and accuracy of 93.6%. EUS-FNA had a sensitivity of 87.3%, specificity of 100%, PPV of 100%, NPV of 85.2%, and accuracy of 92.7%. CONCLUSION: EUS with EUS-FNA is an accurate procedure in the diagnosis of GI tumors with negative endoscopic biopsies.