Readiness for Interprofessional Learning Among Students of Four Undergraduate Health Professions Education Programs.

Background: In interprofessional learning, students from different professions learn about, from, and with each other so that they can collaborate effectively, deliver high-quality healthcare, and achieve positive health outcomes. This study aimed to explore the readiness of students from four health professions education programs for interprofessional learning. Methods: A cross-sectional descriptive study was carried out on 339 students. The Readiness for Interprofessional Learning Scale (RIPLS) was used to collect data. Descriptive statistics were used. Paired-samples t-test and ANOVA test were used to compare the responses of participants. Correlations between dependent and independent variables were explored by Pearson's correlation test. The statistical significance level was set at p < 0.05. Results: The reliability study of the collected data showed excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's ɑ = 0.819). Results revealed a statistically significant difference between the responses of students from the four programs regarding the "Roles and Responsibilities" subscale (p = 0.000). A statistically significant difference between male and female students regarding two statements within the "Teamwork and Collaboration" subscale and one statement within the "Negative Professional Identity" subscale (p < 0.05) was also detected. The correlation study showed a weak but statistically significant correlation between RIPLS mean scores and the students' study program (p < 0.015). Conclusion: In conclusion, the students showed readiness for IPL as evidenced by their positive perception of the interprofessional learning concepts.

Medical Community Perspectives Regarding the Egyptian Medical Licensing Exam: A Mixed-Method Study.

BACKGROUND: Although national licensing examinations (NLEs) may be a costly process, they can predict performance of medical practitioners for many years following graduation. The current licensing requirements do not fulfill this function as there are no clear performance criteria for them. Therefore, new requirements should be developed and announced. OBJECTIVE:  The study aims to develop a framework for the Egyptian Medical Licensing Exam (EMLE) by exploring the opinions and perceptions of Egyptian health practitioners and medical educators. METHODS: This study is a two-phase exploratory mixed-method study. An online discussion forum was conducted with medical practitioners and educators concerning the development of the EMLE. Then, an online survey was distributed to explore the opinions of medical practitioners and educators about the EMLE. RESULTS: Fifty medical practitioners and educators participated in the discussion forum about the development of the EMLE, while 266 participants responded to the online survey. The responses of the participants contributed to the development of a framework for the EMLE that is divided into two main sections, the exam logistics and the exam set up. The exam logistics included the exam committee, prerequisites for the exam, the admission criteria and fees, and validity of the license. The exam set up included exam setting, structure, pass marks, and exam retake policy. CONCLUSION: The study concluded that medical practitioners and educators could contribute greatly to the planning for the EMLE. Their opinions are based on their experiences and include the timing of the exam, blueprinting, assessment methods, psychometrics and retake.

Use of Electronic Health (eHealth) Among Saudi Type 2 Diabetic Patients and Its Association With Their Diabetic Self-Management: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Background Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a prevalent, chronic, non-communicable disease that requires continuous multidisciplinary health care. Electronic health (eHealth) refers to "the transfer of health information resources and health care services using different electronic platforms." This may have an effect on diabetes self-management (DSM). Objectives This study aimed to identify the use of eHealth among patients with T2DM as well as its association with DSM. Method An analytical cross-sectional study was conducted online using a newly adapted three-part questionnaire using Google Forms through different social media platforms. A total of 2,228 adult Saudi T2DM patients from different provinces were selected based on the non-probability voluntary response sampling technique. The survey included demographic, clinical, and eHealth data, and diabetic self-care management. Results The study results revealed an average DSM score of 5.2/10, and 74.1% were receiving diabetes care at primary health care centers. Of these, 87.1% used eHealth, mainly through Google (55.7%) and other social media (12.9%), and were satisfied with the quality of health care (70.4%). Moreover, 82% wanted to discuss the eHealth information with their physicians, but some (34.5%) had no online access to them. eHealth dependency was 44.2% and was associated with a lower mean DSM (5.6 vs. 5.3; p = 0.000) with significantly lower health care use (6.7 vs. 5.6; p = 0.000) and glucose management (4.7 vs. 4.0, p=0.000) compared to the independent group. The DSM total score was a significant predictor of eHealth dependency (OR: 1.022; 95% CI: 1.006-1.039; p = 0.007). Conclusion Most Saudi T2DM patients with an average DSM use different eHealth resources and are satisfied with their quality. Dependency to eHealth is significantly associated with lower DSM, especially for health care use and glucose management, a finding that could affect patient outcomes. Still, patients need to communicate with their physicians in person who should have different options for remote consultation, such as telemedicine, to support their patients.

Challenges to Interprofessional Education: will e-Learning be the Magical Stick?

PURPOSE: In Egypt, the main challenges to interprofessional education (IPE) implementation are complexity of the required curricular design, the attitudinal barriers between professions, and the needed resources. Action research work was planned and implemented to identify alternative solutions to overcome barriers to IPE in the local Egyptian context. METHODS: -An 8-week e-learning elective course was developed, implemented, and evaluated. A mixed group of 30 nursing and medical students was enrolled voluntarily in the course. Female to male ratio was 3:2. Four faculty members were assigned to manage the course. Based on the EMRO-WHO guidelines, ethics content was selected and organized. A closed Facebook group was created and utilized as the e-learning platform. Facilitated large-group and case-based discussions were the main instructional methods. Scoring of mixed small group assignments was the main assessment tool. Course evaluation was conducted using the Interprofessional Socialization and Valuing Scale (ISVS) and an Online-Course Evaluation Questionnaire (OCEQ). RESULTS: ISVS results revealed that students' perception of ability, comfort and value in working with others, were all positive. The OCEQ provided additional evidence regarding the satisfaction of students with the Facebook group as a learning platform. Assignment submission rate was 90%. Success rate of small group assignments (scores ≥ 60%) was 100%. Response rate to the open online discussions was 63%. Through peer evaluation as well as direct observation of online discussions, there was evidence of distinct contributions by females and by medical students compared to nursing students. CONCLUSION: As evidenced by the students' perception and performance, our IPE distance learning experience was valuable. Motivation of medical students as well as females was evident. IPE is a challenging process. The elective approach and using DL can offer solutions. Conducting relevant practical sessions as well as sustainability of this IPE e-learning experience remain key challenges.

Measuring the Patients' Satisfaction About Telemedicine Used in Saudi Arabia During COVID-19 Pandemic.

Background Many studies have found that telemedicine and telehealth services quality and patients' clinical outcomes, following telehealth visits, maybe comparable to those of traditional face-to-face office visits especially in a crisis like COVID-19 complete lockdown. Objective This study aimed to identify the patient's experience in using the telemedicine strategies during the COVID-19 pandemic and assess these patients' perception about their experience of using telemedicine in Saudi Arabia. Methods A cross-sectional survey study was done on 425 patients treated through telemedicine programs in Saudi Arabia from February to August 2020 during the COVID-19 pandemic in Saudi Arabia. An online questionnaire was adopted and modified to elicit participants' socio-demographic data, participants' satisfaction and attitude toward telehealth and telemedicine, and their views on health care services. Results About 84.9% of the participants thought that telemedicine made healthcare easier during the COVID-19 pandemic. Almost half of the respondent was very satisfied with the ease of registration (52%), while 43.4% of respondents stated that they had the ability to talk freely over telemedicine. In the present study, The highest satisfaction was reported by 53.4% of respondents for ease registration, 40.1% for quality of the visual image, 41.9% for quality of the audio sound, and 44.8% for their ability to talk freely over telemedicine, respectively. The highest satisfaction was reported by 40.5% about the ability to understand the recommendations, 40.5% about the overall quality of care provided, 37.4% about the overall telemedicine consult experience. The results revealed a significant positive correlation between satisfaction and attitude scores. Conclusion This study revealed acceptable satisfaction and attitude of patients toward telemedicine programs in Saudi Arabia. However, more effort should be done by the Saudi Ministry of Health to increase the knowledge of patients about teleconsultation available services.