Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Egypt J Immunol ; 17(2): 45-55, 2010.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23082486

RESUMO

Detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) has been problematic ever since its discovery. This work was performed to evaluate the effectiveness of different phenotypic methods for MRSA detection in intensive care patients. Three hundred and eighty-nine specimens from 100 patients were inoculated onto mannitol salt agar. All S. aureus isolates were examined by four selective culture media [ORSAB, MSO, MSA-Cefox, OAS], two disc diffusion methods [CDD and ODD], and MicroScan panel for MRSA. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for mecA gene was performed as the gold standard. S. aureus isolates were revealed from 56 patients, 41 of them were found to be MRSA by PCR. CDD yielded the best sensitivity (97.6%), followed by ODD and MSA-Cefox (92.7%). CDD, MSA-Cefox and OAS showed the best specificity (100%). In conclusion, MSA-Cefox and CDD showed improved sensitivity and excellent specificity compared to other methods. It is advisable to use the two methods for MRSA detection if PCR is not available.


Assuntos
Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina/genética , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina/isolamento & purificação , Técnicas de Diagnóstico Molecular/métodos , Infecções Estafilocócicas/microbiologia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Cuidados Críticos , Meios de Cultura , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...