Can cross-sectional imaging replace diagnostic venography in pelvic venous disorder (PeVD)?

OBJECTIVE: The primary etiology of pelvic venous disorder is multifactorial and challengeable in vascular surgery as it mandates multidisciplinary team cooperation for its evaluation and management. METHODS: All patients investigated for pelvic venous disorder in a high-volume, tertiary referral university hospital were identified and analyzed retrospectively during the period (March 2021 through September 2022). Demographic and medical data were scored. Agreement between the noninvasive modalities (computed tomographic venography [CTV] or magnetic resonance venography [MRV]) and diagnostic venography in detecting the refluxing pelvic veins was analyzed. Sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy are also measured. No patients' treatments were reported in this study as the treatment is scheduled in other sessions in some cases and is out of the scope of this article. All patients had a diagnostic venogram regardless of the axial imaging modality. The main goal was to compare cross-sectional imaging with diagnostic venography. RESULTS: The total number of patients was 120 with a mean age of 34.4 ± 7.1 years; 86.7% were multiparous. All patients presented chronic pelvic pain with vulvoperineal and/or atypical lower limb varicosities. Then patients were divided into two groups: those with CTV and those with MRV. Sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy of CTV were 50%, 33%, and 47% for the detection of incompetent ovarian veins, 83%, 33%, and 53% for the detection of incompetent internal iliac veins, and 50%, 40%, and 47% for the detection of incompetent pelvic plexus veins, respectively, whereas time-resolved MRV achieved sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy of 73%, 25%, and 60% for the detection of incompetent ovarian veins, 75%, 46%, and 53% for the detection of incompetent internal iliac veins, and 67%, 33% and 60% for detection of incompetent pelvic plexus veins, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The desire to avoid the drawbacks of diagnostic venography led to an increase in the use of noninvasive imaging modalities. Our results achieved acceptable sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy outcomes for cross-sectional imaging with the superiority of MRV over CTV in diagnosing PCS.

Long-Term Outcomes of the Covered Endovascular Reconstruction of the Aortic Bifurcation (CERAB) Technique in Patients With Aorto-Iliac Occlusive Disease.

BACKGROUND: The Covered Endovascular Reconstruction of the Aortic Bifurcation (CERAB) reconstruction is an endovascular technique, developed to reconstruct the aortic bifurcation in the most optimal anatomical and physiological manner. Short-term data were promising, but long-term data are still lacking. The objective was to report the long-term outcomes of CERAB for extensive aorto-iliac occlusive disease and to identify predictors for loss of primary patency. METHODS: Consecutive electively treated patients with CERAB for aorto-iliac occlusive disease in a single hospital were identified and analyzed. Baseline and procedural data and follow-up were collected at 6-weeks, 6 months, 12 months, and annually thereafter. Technical success, procedural, and 30-day complications were evaluated, as well as overall survival. Patency and freedom from target lesion revascularization rates were analyzed using Kaplan Meier curves. Uni- and multivariate analysis were performed to identify possible predictors of failure. RESULTS: One hundred and sixty patients were included (79 male). Indication for treatment was intermittent claudication for 121 patients (75.6%) and 133 patients (83.1%) had a TASC-II D lesion. Technical success was obtained in 95.6% of patients and the 30-day mortality rate was 1.3%. The 5-year primary, primary-assisted, and secondary patency rates were 77.5%, 88.1%, and 95.0%, respectively, with a freedom-from clinically driven target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR) rate of 84.4%. The strongest predictor of loss of primary patency of CERAB was a previous aorto-iliac intervention (odds ratio [OR]=5.36 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.30; 22.07), p=0.020). In patients not previously treated in the aorto-iliac tract, 5-year primary, primary assisted, and secondary patency rates were 85.1%, 94.4%, and 96.9%, respectively. At 5-year follow-up, an improved Rutherford was found in 97.9% of patients and the freedom from major amputation rate was 100%. CONCLUSION: The CERAB technique is related to good long-term outcomes, particularly in primary cases. In patients that had prior treatment for aorto-iliac occlusive disease, there were more reinterventions and therefore surveillance should likely be more intense. CLINICAL IMPACT: The Covered Endovascular Reconstruction of the Aortic Bifurcation (CERAB) reconstruction was designed to improve outcomes of endovascular treatment of extensive aorto-iliac occlusive disease. At 5-year follow-up clinical improvement was found in 97.9% of patients without major amputations. The 5-year overall primary, primary-assisted, and secondary patency rates were 77.5%, 88.1%, and 95.0%, respectively, with a freedom-from clinically driven target lesion revascularization rate of 84.4%. Significantly better patency rates were observed for patients that were never treated before in the target area. The data implicate that CERAB are a valid treatment option for patients with extensive aorto-iliac occlusive disease. For patients previously treated in the target area, other treatment options might be considered, or more intensive follow-up surveillance is warranted.