RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Pleural effusion is a medical condition where an excessive amount of fluid accumulates in the pleural space. This can be caused by inflammation or malignant growth in the body. Doctors use medical thoracoscopy for both diagnostic and therapeutic purposes. This technique allows them to view the internal pleural surfaces and take biopsies of any abnormal lesions within the pleural cavity. OBJECTIVE: This work aimed to evaluate the diagnostic value of pleuroscopy in patients with undiagnosed exudative pleural effusion. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A study was conducted on 61 patients who had undiagnosed exudative pleural effusion and were admitted to the chest department at the cardiothoracic unit of the Minia University Hospital. All patients provided written consent and underwent a complete history and clinical examination. Standard laboratory tests, including routine liver and kidney function tests, a complete blood count, and a coagulation profile, were conducted on all patients, along with chest X-rays. If necessary, a chest CT scan was also performed. Diagnostic thoracentesis was done, and the pleural fluid was analyzed for sugar, protein, and lactate dehydrogenase and sent for bacteriological analysis (Gram stain, culture, and acid-fast bacilli smear) and cytopathological examination. Medical thoracoscopy was performed in cases where an etiological diagnosis was not established. RESULTS: A total of 61 patients with undiagnosed exudative pleural effusions were included. A definitive etiological diagnosis was reached in 58 (95%) patients. In 47 (77%) of the studied group, malignant etiology was confirmed; nine (14.8%) had tuberculous pleurisy, one (1.6%) had empyema, and one (1.6%) had inflammatory/autoimmune pleurisy. A definite diagnosis was not reached in three (5%) patients. The malignant pathology was caused by bronchogenic carcinoma in 20 (42.5%) cases, malignant mesothelioma in 10 (21.3%) cases, metastatic malignant deposits from other organs in six (12.7%) cases, and lymphoma in three (6.5%) cases. No serious adverse events related to the procedure were recorded. The most common minor complications were transient chest pain in 34 (55.7%) patients, followed by surgical emphysema in 10 (16.4%) patients. CONCLUSION: Pleuroscopy is an effective diagnostic tool for identifying the cause of pleural effusion when it is unclear. It is a minimally invasive and straightforward procedure associated with high diagnostic accuracy and low complication rates.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Despite much research about lupus nephritis, none of the urinary biomarkers has been proven to be truly reflecting lupus nephritis activity, response to treatment, or prognosis. We aimed to study urinary biomarkers in lupus nephritis and test their relation to kidney damage. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) were divided into two graoups: (1) lupus nephritis group with biopsy-proven proliferative lupus nephritis (classes III and IV) and who did not receive immunosuppressive drugs within the preceding 3 months except for glucocorticoids and (2) lupus non-nephritis group with SLE patients without any renal manifestation. We assessed disease activity by the SLE disease activity index. uNGAL, uKim-1, uNGAL to urinary creatinine excretion (mg/dl), and uKim-1 to urinary creatinine excretion were measured in random spot urine samples at the time of renal biopsy and 6 months after the induction therapy. RESULTS: The LN group before treatment showed higher levels of uNGAL and uKIM-1 (P-value < 0.001). ROC analysis showed that uNGAL at level of > 59 has a 95 % sensitivity, a 100 % specificity, and an AUC = 0.996 in the ability to diagnose LN. While the uKIM-1 ROC showed that at level of > 1.6, it has an 85 % sensitivity, an 80 % specificity, and an AUC = 0.919. uNGAL and uKIM levels were significantly lower after treatment (P-value < 0.001). No significant correlations were found between urinary markers before and after treatment with other clinical, inflammatory, and serological markers of lupus nephritis. CONCLUSION: uNGAL, uKIM, uNGAL/Creat ratio, and uKIM/Creat ratio can be used as a predictor and a marker of disease activity for lupus nephritis. Key Points ⢠Renal biopsy is the current standard for diagnosis of lupus nephritis and none of the urinary biomarkers has been fully concluded to have a diagnostic power to reflect the activity or the response to treatment. ⢠However, based on the finding of the current study, uNGAL, uKIM, uNGAL/Creat ratio, and uKIM/Creat ratio showed significant diagnostic performance and were powerful indices of renal involvement in systemic lupus patients and as markers of disease activity.
