Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Urologia ; 89(3): 424-429, 2022 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35152799

RESUMO

PURPOSE: We report our experience with transperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomy (LN) for giant hydronephrosis (GH) and compare the outcome data with open nephrectomy (ON). PATIENTS AND METHODS: The retrospective data of 88 patients (52 males and 36 females) who underwent LN or ON for treatment of GH in the period between October 2015 and December 2019 were investigated. LN was performed in 38 patients, while 50 patients underwent ON. We compared the two groups for success, operative time, and intraoperative and postoperative complications. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients in the LN group was 45.8 ± 11.4 years, and it was 44.7 ± 10.8 years in the ON group. The mean operative time in the LN group was statistically significantly longer when compared with the ON group195 ± 18 min versus 127 ± 22 min (p = 0.01).The estimated blood loss was significantly greater in the ON group (p = 0.01). However, no patients required blood transfusions in either group. The visual analog pain (VAP) scores were significantly higher on both day 1 and day 2 in the ON group 3.6 ± 0.9 and 2 ± 0.7 versus 2.7 ± 0.6 and 1.4 ± 0.5 in LN group, (p = 0.01). CONCLUSION: LN for GH is feasible, safe, and efficacious. Compared to open surgery, the laparoscopic approach resulted in significantly shorter hospital stays, decreased morbidity, and quicker recovery. Some tips and tricks could help to do it in an easier way and reduce the operative time.


Assuntos
Hidronefrose , Laparoscopia , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Hidronefrose/etiologia , Hidronefrose/cirurgia , Laparoscopia/métodos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Nefrectomia/métodos , Duração da Cirurgia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
Andrologia ; 51(10): e13399, 2019 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31502262

RESUMO

Post penile implant sexual satisfaction in elderly patients is a multifactorial issue. In the present study, we investigated the possible implication of age on satisfaction after malleable penile implant surgery in elderly patients. We compared post-operative sexual satisfaction in the elderly with that of a younger age group (reference group). Patients were classified into three groups according to their ages (group I <45, group II between 45 and 65, and group III older than 65 years old). Modified Erectile Dysfunction Inventory of Treatment Satisfaction (EDITS) questionnaire was used at 3, 6 and 12 months after implant surgery. EDITS scores showed statistically significant high satisfaction rates in all age groups. EDITS scores were higher in the early post-operative period in younger groups compared to elderly patients. However, the difference between groups was insignificant at 12 months post-operatively (p value = .06). Our results show that elderly patients have a high post-operative satisfaction rate close to that of younger age groups, and they are suitable candidates for penile implant surgery with good and realistic post-operative sexual satisfaction expectations.


Assuntos
Disfunção Erétil/cirurgia , Satisfação do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Implante Peniano/métodos , Prótese de Pênis , Comportamento Sexual/psicologia , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Implante Peniano/instrumentação , Estudos Retrospectivos , Inquéritos e Questionários/estatística & dados numéricos , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...