Reduced reactogenicity of primary vaccination with DT3aP-HBV-IPV/Hib compared with DT2aP-HBV-IPV-Hib among infants: Mathematical projections in six countries.

The hexavalent vaccines DT3aP-HBV-IPV/Hib and DT2aP-HBV-IPV-Hib are routinely used for primary immunization of infants against diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, hepatitis B virus, poliomyelitis, and Haemophilus influenzae type b. A recent publication showed that after primary immunization with these vaccines, the odds ratios of adverse reactions (ARs) were significantly lower for DT3aP-HBV-IPV/Hib than for DT2aP-HBV-IPV-Hib. Our aim is to understand the impact of the various reactogenicity profiles at country level by comparing the ARs induced by one dose of DT3aP-HBV-IPV/Hib versus DT2aP-HBV-IPV-Hib in the primary infant immunization course. A mathematical projection tool was developed to simulate vaccination of infants with both vaccines in six countries: Austria, the Czech Republic, France, Jordan, Spain, and the Netherlands. Proportions of three local and five systemic ARs of interest for both vaccines were based on findings from a previous meta-analysis of ARs in infants. The absolute risk reductions calculated ranged from 3.0% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.8%-3.2%) for "Swelling at the injection site, any grade" to 10.0% (95% CI: 9.5%-10.5%) for "Fever, any grade." The difference in occurrence of the AR "Fever, any grade" between vaccines in 2020 ranged from over 7,000 in Austria to over 62,000 in France. Over 5 years, this would amount to a reduction of over 150,000 ARs in Austria and over 1.4 million ARs in France when using DT3aP-HBV-IPV/Hib instead of DT2aP-HBV-IPV-Hib. In conclusion, the estimated numbers of ARs following hexavalent vaccination in six countries showed that vaccination of infants with DT3aP-HBV-IPV/Hib could lead to fewer ARs than vaccination with DT2aP-HBV-IPV-Hib.

Vaccination of infants against diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, hepatitis B, poliomyelitis, and Haemophilus influenzae type b is often performed with combined vaccines against these six diseases. In many countries, these are the first vaccinations received by infants, and potential adverse reactions could affect compliance with future vaccinations. A previous study examined two of the combined vaccines, DT3aP-HBV-IPV/Hib and DT2aP-HBV-IPV-Hib, and showed that local adverse reactions at the injection site (pain, redness, and swelling) and general adverse reactions (fever, drowsiness, irritability, persistent crying, and lack of appetite) were less common after vaccination with DT3aP-HBV-IPV/Hib than with DT2aP-HBV-IPV-Hib.To understand the impact of this finding at a population level, we compared the adverse reactions caused by the hypothetical administration of the two vaccines under similar conditions. We simulated the vaccination of infants with both vaccines in six countries: Austria, the Czech Republic, France, Jordan, Spain, and the Netherlands.The simulation showed that the DT3aP-HBV-IPV/Hib vaccine could reduce cases of swelling at the injection site by 3% and fever by 10%. For the year 2020, the resulting reduction in the estimated number of fever occurrences would have ranged from over 7,000 in Austria to over 62,000 in France. In total, adverse reactions avoided could hypothetically have ranged from 30,781 in Austria to 269,025 in France. Over 5 years, this could have avoided an estimated number of adverse reactions of over 150,000 in Austria to over 1.4 million in France. In conclusion, such a switch of vaccine could substantially reduce adverse reactions.

Hepatitis A in the Eastern Mediterranean Region: a comprehensive review.

INTRODUCTION: With 583 million inhabitants, the Eastern Mediterranean Region (EMR) is a worldwide hub for travel, migration, and food trade. However, there is a scarcity of data on the epidemiology of the hepatitis A virus (HAV). METHODS: The MEDLINE and grey literature were systematically searched for HAV epidemiological data relevant to the EMR region published between 1980 and 2020 in English, French, or Arabic. RESULTS: Overall, 123 publications were extracted. The proportion of HAV cases among acute viral hepatitis cases was high. HAV seroprevalence rate ranged from 5.7% to 100.0% and it was decreasing over time while the average age at infection increased. CONCLUSION: In the EMR, HAV remains a significant cause of acute viral hepatitis. The observed endemicity shift will likely increase disease burden as the population ages. Vaccinating children and adopting sanitary measures are still essential to disease prevention; vaccinating at-risk groups might reduce disease burden even further.

What is the context?Hepatitis A is a viral liver disease caused by the hepatitis A virus.It is generally transmitted by ingestion of contaminated food or water or through contact with an infected person.Disease severity increases with age. Children under 6 years of age are usually asymptomatic, while adults are the most affected.Limited information exists on the number of cases and transmission of hepatitis A in the Eastern Mediterranean region, which includes 21 countries and Palestine, as defined by the World Health Organization.What is new?We performed a literature review to summarize data on hepatitis A disease in the Eastern Mediterranean region over the last 40 years (1980-2020). As information for many countries is scarce or outdated, most of the data is from Egypt, Iran and Saudi Arabia.We found that: Hepatitis A virus is the most common cause of acute viral hepatitis.Hepatitis A exposure varied according to the country's income level.Low- and middle-income countries showed a universal immunity to hepatitis A virus, although this is not the case anymore.What is the impact?Hepatitis A infections have decreased worldwide. Lower exposure to the virus has led to an increase in the susceptible population (including adolescent and adults).Hepatitis A vaccination for children and high-risk groups such travelers should be considered in the Eastern Mediterranean region.

Systematic review of the rotavirus infection burden in the WHO-EMRO region.

Rotavirus gastroenteritis imposes a heavy burden on low- and middle-income countries. The World Health Organization defines the Eastern Mediterranean region (WHO-EMRO) as a diverse area in terms of socioeconomic status and health indicators. Rotavirus vaccination has been introduced, at least partially, in 19 out of the 22 EM countries; however, vaccine coverage remains low, and data on rotavirus disease burden is scarce.Available data on rotavirus prevalence, seasonality, vaccination status, and genotype evolution was systematically compiled following a literature review that identified 165 relevant WHO-EMRO epidemiology studies published between 1990 and 2017.Although the infectious agents responsible for acute gastroenteritis vary over time, rotavirus remained the leading cause of acute gastroenteritis in children, as seen in 76.3% of reviewed publications. Younger children (<2 years old) were at higher risk and thus increased vaccination coverage and surveillance systems are required to reduce the rotavirus gastroenteritis burden in WHO-EMRO countries.

Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy of lower ureteric stones: Outcome and criteria for success.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) for distal ureteric calculi (DUC) and to determine variables that could affect the outcome results. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between April 2004 and February 2008, 100 patients with a solitary DUC were treated with in situ ESWL using a lithotripter (Lithostar Plus, Siemens, Erlangen, Germany). The outcome of treatment was evaluated after 3 months. The patients' clinical and radiological findings, as well as stone characteristics, were reviewed and correlated with the stone-free rate (SFR). RESULTS: After in situ ESWL, 84 patients (84%) were stone-free (after one session in 57 and after two in 27). From a univariate analysis only three factors had a significant impact on the SFR, i.e. the body mass index (BMI), stone length and stone width. The SFR was significantly lower in obese patients than in normal and overweight patients (P = 0.019). Stone width ⩾8 mm was associated with a SFR of 64% (14/22), compared with 89.7% (70/78) for those with a stone width of <8 mm (P = 0.007). The SFR was 86.8% (66/76) for a stone length of ⩽10 mm and 71% (17/24) for a stone length of >10 mm (P = 0.016). On multivariate analysis, BMI, stone width and stone length maintained their statistical significance. CONCLUSION: Primary in situ ESWL remains an effective and safe form of treatment for DUC. The length and transverse diameter of the stone, together with the BMI of the patient, were the only significant predictors of the overall success of ESWL.