Efficacy and safety of polyethylene glycol loxenatide in type 2 diabetic patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Polyethylene glycol loxenatide (PEX168) is a novel glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist with a longer half-life developed by modifying the chemical structure of exenatide. This study aims to assess the efficacy and safety of PEX168 and determine the best dose. We searched PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases from inception to April 25, 2023, for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing PEX168 therapy alone or in combination with metformin versus other therapies. We used the risk ratio (RR) for dichotomous outcomes and the mean difference (MD) for continuous outcomes, both with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Six RCTs, including 1248 participants, were included. PEX168 added to metformin was significantly better than metformin alone regarding fasting blood glucose (MD = -1.20, 95% CI (-1.78, - 0.62), p < 0.0001), HbA1c (MD = -1.01, 95% CI (-1.48, - 0.53), p < 0.0001), and postprandial glycemia (MD = -1.94, 95% CI (-2.99, - 0.90), p = 0.0003). Similarly, for glycemic control, PEX168 monotherapy was superior to placebo (P < 0.05). No significant effects were noticed in terms of triglycerides, low-density lipoprotein, or high-density lipoprotein (p > 0.05). Body weight was significantly reduced in obese diabetic patients receiving PEX168 compared to the control group (MD = -5.46, 95% CI (-7.90, - 3.01), p < 0.0001) but not in non-obese patients (MD = 0.06, 95% CI (-0.47, 0.59), p = 0.83). People who received PEX168 alone or with metformin showed more common gastrointestinal adverse effects, especially nausea and vomiting (p < 0.05). PEX168 100, 200, and 300 ug monotherapy demonstrated comparable safety and diabetes control to metformin, but when combined with metformin, PEX168 100 and 200 ug showed significant effects on diabetes control; however, only the latter showed a significantly higher incidence of nausea and vomiting (p < 0.05). PEX168 could be a viable option for treating diabetic patients whose metformin control is inadequate or who cannot tolerate metformin. PEX168 at 100 ug in combination with metformin was found to be safe and more effective compared to metformin; however, due to the small number of trials included, these findings should be interpreted with caution, and additional trials are required.

The effects of acupressure on postoperative nausea and vomiting among patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Laparoscopic surgery is one of the most commonly performed surgeries in general surgery, with fewer side effects and rapid recovery. Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) remains the main challenge that confronts the prognosis of this minimally invasive surgery. We aimed to evaluate the effect of acupressure, a nonpharmacological non-invasive method, on the incidence of nausea and vomiting following laparoscopic surgery within the early phase (first six hours postoperatively) and the extended phase (for at least 24 h postoperatively). METHODS: We searched PubMed, Cochran, Scopus, Web of Science, Google scholar, and Wiley for randomized controlled trials that evaluated the effect of acupressure on PONV in patients undergoing laparoscopy. Data were extracted and analyzed in a random model, and pooled risk ratios (RRs) with their respective 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. RESULTS: Eleven trials were included in the meta-analysis, comprising 941 patients. Most of the included patients were females undergoing gynecological laparoscopy or laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Acupressure significantly lowered the incidence of nausea and vomiting, within the early phase (RR = 0.62, 95% CI [0.44 to 0.88]; p = 0.008), (RR = 0.5, 95% CI [0.30 to 0.84]; p = 0.008), and the extended phase (RR = 0.65, 95% CI [0.52 to 0.83]; p = 0.0003), (RR = 0.44, 95% CI [0.32 to 0.61]; p < 0.00001), respectively. Moreover, acupressure significantly reduced the need for rescue antiemetic drugs in both phases (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Acupressure is an effective procedure for reducing nausea, vomiting, and the need for antiemetic drugs after laparoscopic surgery.

Dose-dependent efficacy and safety of licogliflozin on obese adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Licogliflozin is a dual SGLT1/2 inhibitor acting on the intestine and kidney by reducing glycemic and calorie content. We aimed to determine the efficacy and safety of licogliflozin on Anthropometric measurements and cardiometabolic parameters in obese participants. METHODS: We systematically searched the PubMed, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and Web of Science databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) relevant to our eligibility criteria. We performed a subgroup analysis based on licogliflozin doses and the diabetic state of participants. This meta-analysis was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42021286936). RESULTS: We identified five RCTs with a total of 905 obese and overweight participants. All participants had a weight reduction of 2.43 kg (95% CI: -3.17 to -1.69, p < 0.00001) compared with placebo. The mean difference in HbA1c of obese diabetic patients was (MD: -0.30%; 95% CI: -0.45, -0.16); I2 = 46% in favor of licogliflozin. The incidence of serious adverse events, all-cause mortality, headache, nausea, and vomiting were similar between licogliflozin and placebo (p = 0.72, 0.97, 0.09, 0.53, and 0.89, respectively). However, there was a higher incidence of diarrhea in the licogliflozin group. CONCLUSION: We found that licogliflozin was safe and tolerable. It reduces body weight significantly. Moreover, it improves glycemic control and other cardiometabolic parameters.

Efficacy and safety of imeglimin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Imeglimin is a novel tetrahydrotriazine-containing drug suggested as a safe drug for glycemic management in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). We aimed to 1) evaluate the efficacy of imeglimin on glycemic control and insulin resistance improvement measured by homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR). 2) assess whether the novel drug improves lipid parameters in diabetic patients. 3) compare between different doses regarding safety. METHODS: We searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, Scopus, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and Wiley through April 25, 2021, for relevant randomized controlled trials comparing different doses of imeglimin supplied as a monotherapy or as add-on therapy versus placebo for adult patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Data on glycemic and lipid parameters and adverse events were extracted and pooled in random-effect models using Review Manager version 5.3. RESULTS: Eight studies comprising 1555 patients with T2DM were included in this study. The overall effect estimate of the meta-analysis showed that the imeglimin group was superior to the control group concerning glycated hemoglobin and fasting plasma glucose (P < 0.00001). However, it did not affect HOMA-IR or lipid parameters, including triglyceride, LDL-C, and HDL-C (all p > 0.05). Regarding safety profile, imeglimin was safe and tolerable with no treatment-emergent or serious adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Imeglimin safely improved glycemic control by reducing HbA1c and FPG. However, no beneficial effects regarding insulin resistance measured by HOMA-IR or lipid parameters were observed. Further high-quality RCTs with high dose imeglimin are encouraged to ensure HOMA-IR and lipid parameters results.