Efficacy of intraoperative cine-portogram for complicated portal vein reconstruction in pediatric living donor liver transplantation.

Sufficient PV flow is necessary to achieve successful PV reconstruction in pediatric LDLT. IOCP can be used to assess the severity of PV stenosis and to identify potential portosystemic collateral pathways. The present study reviewed the utility of IOCP and the outcomes of patients who underwent assessment with an IOCP. Consecutive primary LDLTs were performed in 488 pediatric recipients between November 2005 and October 2019. IOCP was used in patients who were unable to achieve sufficient PV flow after the ligation of collaterals. In total, 11 patients underwent IOCP to assess potential portosystemic collateral pathways. The median age and body weight was 8 months (IQR, 6-11 months) and 6.6 kg (IQR, 5.7-8.9 kg), respectively. The reasons for using the IOCP were recurrent PV thrombus in seven patients and insufficient PV flow in four patients. IOCP revealed remaining collaterals in six patients and residual hypoplastic PV in eight patients. Two patients required additional interruption of the potential collaterals under IOCP, which were unable to be recognized as a dominant portosystemic collateral pathway on preoperative imaging. All eight patients with residual hypoplastic PV required vein graft interposition for the complete removal of the hypoplastic PV. All the patients are currently doing well with a median follow-up period of 4.9 years (IQR, 2.2-5.6 years). IOCP can be an effective tool for precisely detecting occult portosystemic collateral pathways and for assessing the patency of the PV anastomosis in pediatric LDLT.

Late T cell-mediated rejection may contribute to poor outcomes in adolescents and young adults with liver transplantation.

Although poor long-term graft survival in LT in AYA is recognized, detailed epidemiological data are still lacking. L-TCMR may have poor outcomes. This study aimed to provide a detailed, epidemiological assessment of the association between AYA age and rejection. L-TCMR was defined in this study as TCMR with central vein or perivenular inflammation occurring later than 3 months after LT. A total of 342 patients who survived for at least 3 months after LT between 2005 and 2015 were enrolled. The AYA group (10-24 years) was compared with the C group (less than 10 years), and the incidence and outcomes of L-TCMR were analyzed. In total, 342 patients had LT; 38 of these were AYA with the mean follow-up period of 6.7 years. A total of 304 patients in C group had a mean follow-up period of 6.3 years (P = .28). The incidence of L-TCMR in AYA group was significantly higher than in C group (15.8% vs 4.6%, P = .006). The time to L-TCMR after LT was significantly shorter in AYA group (P = .01). Neither patient survival nor the incidence of non-adherence differed significantly between the groups (P = .18 and P = .89). The number of additional immunosuppressants after L-TCMR was significantly higher in the AYA group (P = .04). A high incidence of L-TCMR was observed in AYA group irrespective of non-adherence. AYA patients with L-TCMR should be followed carefully due to the poor results of post-treatment biopsy and the need for intensive immunosuppressive therapy.