Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
An. sist. sanit. Navar ; 46(2): e1049, May-Ago. 2023. tab
Artigo em Inglês | IBECS | ID: ibc-227748

RESUMO

Background: Mouthwashes are increasingly being used worldwide. However, these preparations are known to have a negative impact on composite resin dental restorations. In this study, we aim to evaluate the effect of mouthwashes on the microhardness of such restorations. Methods: Thirty specimens of Tetric NCeram composite were prepared. Each composite specimen was cured for 40 seconds and kept in saline solution for 24 hours at 37 °C. Baseline microhardness of each specimen was recorded using an Innovatest Vickers Micro Hardness Tester. Composite specimens were randomly placed in 20 mL of the selected mouthwashes (Colgate® Plax, Listerine® Teeth & Gum Defence, and Closeup® Antibacterial Mouthwash Cool Breeze) and stored in an incubator for 24 hours at 37 °C. Next, microhardness values were rechecked. pH measurements were recorded for each type of mouthwash using a digital pH meter. Results: Due to the acidic nature of Colgate® and Listerine®, the microhardness of the restorations decreased with these mouthwashes; Listerine® caused the greatest decrease in microhardness and had the lowest pH reading (4.34). For Closeup®, with a neutral pH (7.02), no negative effect on microhardness was found; on the contrary, due to the presence of zinc in this latter mouthwash, an increase of the microhardness was found. Conclusions: We confirm the negative effect of acidic mouthwashes on the microhardness of composite dental restorations.(AU)


Fundamento: El uso de colutorios bucales está aumentando a nivel mundial. Sin embargo, es conocido que afectan negativamente a las reparaciones dentales de composite, por lo que el objetivo de este estudio es evaluar el efecto de los colutorios bucales sobre la microdureza de estas reparaciones. Métodos: Se prepararon treinta muestras de composite Tetric NCeram. Cada muestra compuesta se curó durante 40 segundos y se mantuvo en solución salina durante 24 horas a 37 °C. La microdureza inicial de cada muestra se registró utilizando un probador de microdureza Innovatest Vickers. Las muestras se sumergieron aleatoriamente en 20 mL de los colutorios bucales seleccionados (Colgate® Plax, Listerine® Teeth & Gum Defence y Closeup® Antibacterial Mouthwash Cool Breeze) y se incubaron a 37 °C durante 24 horas. A continuación, se volvieron a comprobar los valores de microdureza. El pH de cada colutorio bucal empleado se midió con un pHmetro digital. Resultados: Debido a la naturaleza ácida de Colgate® y Listerine®, la microdureza de las muestras de composite sumergidas en estos colutorios disminuyó; Listerine® causó la mayor disminución de microdureza y mostró el pH más bajo (4,34). Closeup®, con pH neutro (7,02), no mostró ningún efecto negativo sobre la microdureza; por el contrario, su contenido en zinc aumentó la microdureza de las muestras. Conclusiones: Los colutorios bucales ácidos mostraron un efecto negativo sobre la microdureza de las restauraciones dentales de composite.(AU)


Assuntos
Masculino , Feminino , Estética Dentária , Antissépticos Bucais , Saúde Bucal , Reparação de Restauração Dentária , Concentração de Íons de Hidrogênio
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...