Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Craniomaxillofac Surg ; 45(1): 108-112, 2017 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27919594

RESUMO

Controversy exists regarding the use of Duplex Ultrasound (DUS) in addition to the Modified Allen's Test (MAT) for the assessment of collateral circulation prior to elevation of the Radial Forearm Free Flap (RFFF). A survey amongst members of BAOMS Head & Neck Oncology Subspecialty Interest Group and a completed local audit was undertaken to assess the need for DUS. Data for the initial audit was collected retrospectively between 2010 and 2013. Both MAT and DUS was performed routinely during this period. The results of the survey and initial audit led to a change in practice and DUS was no longer requested. The re-audit was performed prospectively between 2013 and 2015. The results of the survey showed that all respondents performed MAT. DUS was performed 'always' by 40%, 'sometimes' by 13.3% and 'never' by 46.7%. A total of 41 patients were included in the initial audit, 6 had an abnormal DUS but only 1 had an abnormal MAT. Five cases had an abnormal DUS but normal MAT and went on to have their ipsilateral RFFF raised without ischaemic complications. The patient with an abnormal MAT had their contralateral RFFF raised. No patients suffered ischaemic complications during the initial audit. A total of 48 patients were included in the re-audit 2 of which had an abnormal MAT and their contralateral RFFF raised. No patients suffered ischaemic complications during the re-audit. In conclusion, routine use of DUS did not provide any additional information above the MAT in identifying patients at risk of ischaemic complications.


Assuntos
Circulação Colateral , Antebraço/cirurgia , Retalhos de Tecido Biológico/cirurgia , Antebraço/irrigação sanguínea , Retalhos de Tecido Biológico/irrigação sanguínea , Humanos , Inquéritos e Questionários , Ultrassonografia
2.
Int J Surg Case Rep ; 10: 162-5, 2015.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25841160

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) is a growing problem within the field of oral and maxillofacial surgery. It is defined as the presence of exposed necrotic alveolar bone that does not resolve over a period of 8 weeks in a patient taking bisphosphonates, who has not had radiotherapy to the jaw [1]. Since the first report in 2003 that highlighted the potential harm caused by MRONJ, many more patients have been diagnosed with the condition [2]. The growth in recent years is likely due to the more potent drugs delivered intravenously however there is some evidence that oral bisphosphonates given over longer periods of time can have similar effects. Bone exposure may occur spontaneously or most commonly occurs following an invasive dental procedure, as shown in the case below [3]. PRESENTATION OF CASE: This case report demonstrates the unpredictable nature of symptoms associated with medication related osteonecrosis and its management within the hospital environment. DISCUSSION: This case demonstrastes the unpredictable nature of MRONJ and how the disease can progress to cause significant morbidity. In this case extensive surgery was required to remove the necrotic fragments of bone with no guarnatee that the necrosis will stop spreading. CONCLUSION: It seems a matter of great importance that the lasting effects of MRONJ are known to general dental and medical practitioners alike. Nationally recognised evidence based guidelines are lacking and uniformity in the management of MRONJ is required amongst the speciality.

3.
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg ; 51(1): e4-5, 2013 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22305711

RESUMO

OMFS has important links with other disciplines in medicine and dentistry. Therefore it is important that people are aware of this speciality. A study was devised to determine the awareness of OMFS among the general public and to improve their understanding. A questionnaire was distributed among the participants attending a dental practice. 100 participated and the mean age was 42.5 years. Only 17% were aware of OMFS. 96% recognised the duty of OMFS practitioner while 74% did agree dual qualification was necessary. 68% identified hospital as the main place of work and 61% thought that the training was 5-6 years long. This study confirms that awareness of OMFS among general public remains low and much needs to be done to improve it.


Assuntos
Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Cirurgia Bucal , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Inquéritos e Questionários , Reino Unido
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...