Studying and Characterization of Coating of Zein-CaSiO3 Composite on Polyetheretherketone Implant Material.

Material-coated implants are placed in the bone and play an essential role in bone regeneration and rapid healing around implants. Polymeric matrix reinforced with ceramic materials is a promising composite material for coating implants. This study aims to determine the effect of mixing various concentrations of zein with CaSiO3 on polyetheretherketone (PEEK) as implant material. The coating was performed using the electrospray method. PEEK disks were used as a control group. The coated disks with different concentrations of zein-CaSiO3 (Group 1: 10% wt, 90% wt), (Group 2: 20% wt, 80% wt), and (Group 3%: 30% wt, 70% wt) were the experimental group. Each group was characterized by atomic force microscopy, field emission scanning electron microscope, Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy, water contact angle, and adhesion strength. The lowest water contact angle was obtained for Group 1: 10% wt and 90% wt were (26.64° and 27.13°, respectively), and increasing amounts of zein in comparison to quantities of CaSiO3 resulted in increased adhesion strength of the composite material to the substrate. The current study suggested that the higher amount of zein compared to the amount of CaSiO3 mixture coating is achieved by electrospraying, a favorable candidate for coating implants compared to uncoated and coated disks with low concentrations of zein compared to concentrations of CaSiO3.

Factors associated with complete and partial remission, improvement, or unchanged diabetes status of obese adults 1 year after sleeve gastrectomy.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (SG) achieves type 2 diabetes (T2D) remission to various extents, and reasons for such variations are unknown. OBJECTIVES: We assessed patients' characteristics associated with T2D remission 1 year post SG. SETTING: University hospital. METHODS: Retrospective study of 230 T2D patients (18-64 yr) who underwent SG at our institution. We examined pre- and postoperative demographic, anthropometric, biochemical, and clinical characteristics associated with T2D complete remission, partial remission, improvement, or unchanged status. Independent predictors of T2D complete remission were assessed by binary logistic regression and then included in 7 predictive models. Logistic regression assessed the pre- and postoperative predictors of T2D complete remission and their predictive performance was measured with the area under the curve of the receiver operating characteristic curve. RESULTS: A total of 230 patients were included in the study, females comprised 69%, and mean age was 45.66 ± 8.84 years. Mean preoperative weight and body mass index were 115.69 ± 20.76 kg and 43.53 ± 6.98 kg/m2, respectively. Approximately two thirds (64.4%) of the sample had diabetes for >5 years. Insulin therapy users comprised 36.9% of the sample and 29.6% of patients were on ≥2 oral hypoglycemic agents (OHA). At 1 year, mean body mass index was 32.77 ± 6.09 kg/m2, percent excess weight loss (%EWL) was 62.29 ± 23.60% and glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1C) improved from 8.1% to 6.18%. Approximately 42.2% of the sample achieved T2D complete remission. Compared with those with no remission, patients with complete remission were significantly younger, had shorter duration of diabetes, were not on insulin therapy, took fewer OHA, had higher C-peptide, lower preoperative HbA1C, were less likely to have had hypertension or dyslipidemia, and more likely to have achieved higher %EWL. Seven proposed models for prediction of complete remission showed the most useful model comprised diabetes duration + pre-HbA1C + %EWL + insulin therapy + age + OHA (area under the curve = .81). Independent predictors of complete remission were preoperative HbA1C, %EWL, insulin therapy, age, and OHA (but not diabetes duration). CONCLUSION: SG results in significant weight reduction and various extents of T2D remission. HbA1C, %EWL, insulin therapy, age, and OHA were independent predictors of complete remission. Assessing these factors before bariatric surgery is important to identify any modifiable characteristics that can be altered to increase the likelihood of remission.

Is Revisional Gastric Bypass as Effective as Primary Gastric Bypass for Weight Loss and Improvement of Comorbidities?

BACKGROUND: Revisional gastric bypass (R-RYGB) surgery is utilized for the management of inadequate weight loss or weight regain observed after some cases of bariatric surgeries. Data on the mid-term effectiveness of primary gastric bypass (P-RYGB) compared with R-RYGB (e.g., post sleeve gastrectomy/gastric banding) are controversial. METHODS: Retrospective chart review of all patients who received P-RYGB and R-RYGB (January 2011-June 2015) at our center. One hundred twenty patients who underwent P-RYGB and 34 R-RYGB who completed 18 months follow-up were included. We compared the effectiveness of P-RYGB with R-RYGB by assessing four anthropometric, two glycemic, and four lipid parameters, as well as the control of type 2 diabetes (T2DM), hypertension, dyslipidemia (remission, improvement, persistence, relapse, de novo), mortality and complications rates. RESULTS: A comparison of the effectiveness of P-RYGB with R-RYGB at 18 months revealed no significant differences in patients' age, gender, and preoperative BMI between groups. However, patients who received P-RYGB had lower mean weight (P = 0.001) and BMI (P < 0.001), reflected by a higher mean delta BMI (P = 0.02), total weight loss percentage (TWL%) (P < 0.0001) and excess weight loss percentage (EWL%) (P < 0.0001). No differences in glycemic parameters, lipid profiles, control of T2DM, hypertension, and dyslipidemia were observed. No death is reported and complication rates were comparable. CONCLUSIONS: Although R-RYGB effectively addressed inadequate weight loss, weight regain, and recurrence of comorbidities after restrictive bariatric surgery, R-RYGB resulted in inferior weight loss compared with P-RYGB. Neither procedure differed in their clinical control of T2DM, hypertension, and dyslipidemia. Both procedures exhibited comparable complication rates.

Lorcaserin vs. Phentermine among non-surgical and surgical obese patients: Anthropometric, glycemic, lipid, safety and cost outcomes.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate effectiveness, safety, and costs of Lorcaserin vs. phentermine among obese non-surgical and surgical patients (post bariatric surgery). METHODS: This retrospective study retrieved charts of all patients (January 2013-June 2016) who received Lorcaserin or phentermine for 3 months. The study assessed anthropometric, glycemic, and lipid changes, as well as side effects and cost of medications among overweight and obese non-surgical (n = 83) and surgical patients (n = 46). These two patient groups were compared using Chi-square (χ2) and unpaired't' test for qualitative and quantitative variables respectively. RESULTS: At 3 months, among the non-surgical group, Phentermine patients had greater percentage of total weight loss (TWL%) (7.65 ±â€¯8.26 vs. 2.99 ±â€¯3.72%, P = 0.003), and greater BMI reduction (-3.16 ±â€¯3.63 vs. -1.15 ±â€¯1.53 kg/m2, P = 0.003) than Lorcaserin. Within the surgical group, Lorcaserin patients had significantly smaller TWL% (1.86 ±â€¯5.06 vs. 7.62 ±â€¯9.80%, P = 0.012), and smaller BMI reduction (-0.74 ±â€¯1.80 vs. -3.06 ±â€¯4.08 kg/m2, P = 0.012) than Phentermine. Lorcaserin exhibited significant total cholesterol and LDL improvements only among surgical patients with significant weight reduction (≥5% TW). Both medications were not associated with glycemic improvements among non-surgical and surgical groups. Phentermine had slightly more side effects but was less expensive. CONCLUSIONS: Among both patient groups, phentermine was more effective in achieving weight loss. Lorcaserin showed dyslipidemia improvements only among surgical patients who achieved significant weight reduction. Anti-obesity medications as part of weight management programs can result in weight loss among non-surgical and surgical patients, or halt weight regain among surgical patients. This is the first study to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of two anti-obesity medications (lorcaserin vs. phentermine) among two distinct obese patient groups, non-surgical and surgical patients.

Evolution of 29 Anthropometric, Nutritional, and Cardiometabolic Parameters Among Morbidly Obese Adolescents 2 Years Post Sleeve Gastrectomy.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is a popular treatment for adolescent morbid obesity. Research on LSG outcomes among adolescents assessed a narrow range of anthropometric, nutritional, or cardiometabolic parameters, leading to an incomplete picture of these changes. We examined a wide variety of anthropometric, nutritional, and cardiometabolic parameters among adolescents before and after LSG. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed medical charts of all obese adolescents who underwent LSG at Hamad Medical Corporation, Qatar, between January 2011 and June 2015 (N = 102). We assessed preoperative levels and postoperative changes in 4 anthropometric, 15 nutritional, and 10 cardiometabolic parameters. RESULTS: The study sample comprised 79 patients with complete information (36 males, mean age 15.99 ± 1.1 years). At a mean of 24.2 months post-LSG, we observed (1) significantly reduced mean weight and body mass index by 51.82 ± 28.1 kg and 17 ± 6.24 kg/m2, respectively; (2) the highest prevalence of post-LSG deficiencies pertained to vitamin D, albumin, and ferritin (89.3, 38, and 33.3%, respectively); (3) low hemoglobin levels (29.3%) only in females; (4) trace elements were not deficient; (4) significant reductions in percentage of adolescents with elevated low-density lipoprotein (from 66.1 to 38.9%), alanine aminotransferase (from 45.3 to 10.9%), and aspartate aminotransferase (from 24.1 to 8.6%) levels; (5) 100% remission of prediabetes cases; and (6) 80% remission of type 2 diabetes cases. CONCLUSIONS: LSG achieved significant weight loss and improvement of cardiometabolic risk factors among adolescents. However, the slight worsening of preexisting nutritional deficiencies warrants careful preoperative surveillance and appropriate postoperative nutritional supplementation.