A Phase II trial of cisplatin plus WR-2721 (amifostine) for metastatic breast carcinoma: an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Study (E8188).

BACKGROUND: Cisplatin has minimal antitumor activity when used as second- or third-line treatment of metastatic breast carcinoma. Older reports suggest an objective response rate of 8% when 60-120 mg/m2 of cisplatin is administered every 3-4 weeks. Although a dose-response effect has been observed with cisplatin, the dose-limiting toxicities associated with cisplatin (e.g., nephrotoxicity, ototoxicity, and neurotoxicity) have limited its use as a treatment for breast carcinoma. WR-2721 or amifostine initially was developed to protect military personnel in the event of nuclear war. Amifostine subsequently was shown to protect normal tissues from the toxic effects of alkylating agents and cisplatin without decreasing the antitumor effect of the chemotherapy. Early trials of cisplatin and amifostine also suggested that the incidence and severity of cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity, ototoxicity, and neuropathy were reduced. METHODS: A Phase II study of the combination of cisplatin plus amifostine was conducted in patients with progressive metastatic breast carcinoma who had received one, but not more than one, chemotherapy regimen for metastatic disease. Patients received amifostine, 910 mg/m2 intravenously over 15 minutes. After completion of the amifostine infusion, cisplatin 120 mg/m2 was administered over 30 minutes. Intravenous hydration and mannitol was administered before and after cisplatin. Treatment was administered every 3 weeks until disease progression. RESULTS: Forty-four patients were enrolled in the study of which 7 (16%) were ineligible. A median of 2 cycles of therapy was administered to the 37 eligible patients. Six partial responses were observed for an overall response rate of 16%. Most patients (57%) stopped treatment because of disease progression. Neurologic toxicity was reported in 52% of patients. Seven different life-threatening toxicities were observed in patients while receiving treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of cisplatin and amifostine in this study resulted in an overall response rate of 16%. Neither a tumor-protective effect nor reduced toxicity to normal tissues was observed with the addition of amifostine to cisplatin in this trial.

Levels of hypoxia-inducible factor-1 alpha during breast carcinogenesis.

BACKGROUND: Hypoxia-inducible factor-1 (HIF-1) is a transcription factor that regulates gene expression in critical pathways involved in tumor growth and metastases. In this report, we investigated whether the level of HIF-1 alpha is increased during carcinogenesis in breast tissue and is associated with other tumor biomarkers. METHODS: Paraffin-embedded clinical specimens from five pathologic stages of breast tumorigenesis and from normal breast tissue were used. HIF-1 alpha protein and the biomarkers vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), HER-2/neu, p53, Ki-67, and estrogen receptor (ER) were identified immunohistochemically, and microvessel density (a measure of angiogenesis) was determined. Associations among levels of HIF-1 alpha and these biomarkers were tested statistically. All statistical tests are two-sided. RESULTS: The frequency of HIF-1 alpha-positive cells in a specimen increased with the specimen's pathologic stage (P<.001, chi(2) test for trend) as follows: normal breast tissue (0 specimens with > or = 1% HIF-1 alpha-positive cells in 10 specimens tested), ductal hyperplastic lesions (0 in 10), well-differentiated ductal carcinomas in situ (DCIS) (11 in 20), well-differentiated invasive breast cancers (12 in 20), poorly differentiated DCIS (17 in 20), and poorly differentiated invasive carcinomas (20 in 20). Increased levels of HIF-1 alpha were statistically significantly associated with high proliferation and increased expression of VEGF and ER proteins. In DCIS lesions, increased levels of HIF-1 alpha were statistically significantly associated with increased microvessel density. HIF-1alpha showed a borderline association with HER-2/neu but no association with p53. CONCLUSIONS: The level of HIF-1 alpha increases as the pathologic stage increases and is higher in poorly differentiated lesions than in the corresponding type of well-differentiated lesions. Increased levels of HIF-1 alpha are associated with increased proliferation and increased expression of ER and VEGF. Thus, increased levels of HIF-1 alpha are potentially associated with more aggressive tumors.

Phase II study of cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil in previously treated metastatic breast cancer: an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group study (PA 185).

PURPOSE: The present study was conducted to investigate the efficacy and toxicity of a cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) combination in previously treated advanced breast cancer. METHODS: Thirty-six women with recurrent metastatic breast cancer were entered on a phase II study of 5-FU 1000 mg/m2/day given intravenously as a continuous infusion on days 1-3 and cisplatin 30 mg/m2/day given intravenously over 1 h on days 2-4, repeated every 21 days. All subjects had received one previous chemotherapy regimen for metastatic disease and either progressed during treatment or relapsed after responding to previous chemotherapy. Fourteen patients had also received previous adjuvant chemotherapy, 17 patients had previous radiation therapy, and 29 patients had previous hormonal therapy. RESULTS: Among 32 response-evaluable patients, there were 10 partial remissions (31%) and 1 complete remission (3%), with an overall objective response rate of 34%. Median duration of response was 4 months. Median survival was 10.5 months for responders and 9.5 months for the entire group. Toxicity was mild to moderate in most patients. Overall twelve patients experienced grade 3 toxicity (10 hematologic, 1 mucositis, and 2 nausea). There were no grade 4 or 5 toxicities. CONCLUSION: Infusional cisplatin and 5-FU is a well tolerated and active regimen in women with previously treated advanced breast cancer.

A phase I/II study of vinorelbine, doxorubicin, and methotrexate with leucovorin rescue as first-line treatment for metastatic breast cancer.

PURPOSE: This study was performed to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and toxicity of vinorelbine when used in combination with doxorubicin and methotrexate with leucovorin rescue in women with metastatic breast cancer. METHODS: Enrolled in the study were 23 women with metastatic breast cancer who had not received prior chemotherapy for metastatic disease. Patients treated at the first dose level received vinorelbine 20 mg/m2 on day 1, doxorubicin 40 mg/m2 on day 1, methotrexate 100 mg/m2 on day 1 and leucovorin 20 mg orally every 6 h for six doses beginning on day 2. Treatment was repeated every 21 days. The vinorelbine dose was escalated by 5 mg/m2 for patients treated at subsequent dose levels. The MTD was defined as the dose level at which fewer than one-third of patients enrolled experienced dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). When the MTD of vinorelbine had been determined, the doxorubicin dose was then escalated by 10 mg/m2 with the vinorelbine dose held at its MTD. RESULTS: total of 98 courses of treatment (median of 4 per patient, range 2-8) were administered. The MTD of this regimen was found to be vinorelbine 25 mg/m2, doxorubicin 40 mg/m2, and methotrexate 100 mg/m2 with leucovorin rescue. At higher doses of vinorelbine, neutropenia, fatigue, arm pain, malaise, nausea and vomiting were dose-limiting. Higher doses of doxorubicin resulted in universal dose limiting neutropenia, and frequent nonhematologic DLT consisting of arm pain, malaise, stomatitis, nausea and vomiting. Amongst the 20 patients with measurable disease, there were 3 complete responses (15%, 95% confidence interval 3%-38%), 5 partial responses (25%, 95% confidence interval 9%-49%) and an overall response rate of 40% (95% confidence interval 19%-64%). The median survival was estimated to be 25 months from the start of chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Vinorelbine at 25 mg/m2 can be safely administered with doxorubicin at 40 mg/m2 and methotrexate at 100 mg/m2 with leucovorin rescue. Response rates observed with this regimen suggest that this combination of chemotherapeutic agents may not be more effective than the combination of vinorelbine and doxorubicin.

Long term follow-up of women treated with 16-week, dose-intensive adjuvant chemotherapy for high risk breast carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: A Phase II study was performed evaluating the disease free and overall survival rates associated with a dose-intensive, 16-week, doxorubicin-based adjuvant chemotherapy regimen in women with breast carcinoma and > or = 10 involved axillary lymph nodes. METHODS: Eligible patients underwent staging with computed tomography and bone scanning and were treated with a 16-week, dose-intensive chemotherapy regimen, comprised of 8 2-week courses of cyclophosphamide, 100 mg/m2 orally, on Days 1-7; doxorubicin, 40 mg/m2 intravenously (i.v.), on Day 1; methotrexate, 100 mg/m2 i.v., on Day 1 with leucovorin rescue, 10 mg/m2, every 6 hours for 6 doses orally on Day 2; vincristine, 1 mg i.v. on Day 1; 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), 600 mg/m2 i.v., on Day 2 over 2 hours; and 5-FU, 300 mg/m2/day continuous i.v. on Days 8 and 9. Tamoxifen, 20 mg daily, was administered to patients with estrogen receptor positive tumors treated after October 1988. All patients were offered locoregional radiation therapy. RESULTS: Sixty-four women were treated on protocol. The median follow-up of 27 surviving patients was > 8 years at last follow-up. Three patients were lost to follow-up. The median time to progression was 54 months, the Kaplan-Meier estimate of event free survival at 5 years was 44% (95% confidence interval [CI], 31-56%), and the Kaplan-Meier estimate of overall survival at 5 years was 57% (95% CI, 44-69%). At 98 months the Kaplan-Meier estimate of freedom from recurrence was 31% (95% CI, 19-43%) and the Kaplan-Meier estimate of survival at 111 months was 36% (95% CI, 23-49%). CONCLUSIONS: Despite the use of dose-intensive, doxorubicin-based, adjuvant chemotherapy, and intensive staging prior to study entry, the results of the current study are similar to those of previous reports for standard dose chemotherapy and appear inferior to those reported for high dose therapy.

Adjuvant systemic management of early stage carcinoma of the breast.

In the last three decades, there has been a gradual, though significant change in the treatment of early stage breast cancer. For almost a century, physicians advocated an "anatomical view" of the dissemination of this disease, which justified a more radical and mutilating treatment strategy. Finally in the mid-1970s, results from large randomized trials began to show that either mastectomy or lumpectomy with radiation therapy were appropriate treatment for women with early stage disease. These results suggested that breast cancer can actually be a systemic disease ("biological view") even in early stages. This hypothesis was confirmed when large randomized clinical trials demonstrated the effectiveness of adjuvant systemic therapy in controlling micrometastatic disease in women with node-positive and node negative disease. As we approach the end of this century, most patients with early stage disease will be offered some form of adjuvant systemic therapy, before or after local treatment with surgery, with or without local radiation therapy. There has been a lot of interest on the proper sequence of the therapeutic modalities, in particular with the recent publication of larger randomized trials of primary systemic therapy. This specific topic is discussed elsewhere in this issue by Singletary.

Sixteen-week multidrug regimen versus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and fluorouracil as adjuvant therapy for node-positive, receptor-negative breast cancer: an Intergroup study.

PURPOSE: The Intergroup conducted this breast cancer adjuvant trial to compare an investigational 16-week regimen with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and fluorouracil (5-FU; CAF). The 16-week regimen features greater doxorubicin and 5-FU dose-intensity than CAF and improved scheduling of antimetabolites with sequential methotrexate and 5-FU, as well as infusion 5-FU. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 646 node-positive, receptor-negative patients were randomly assigned to receive either the 1 6-week regimen or six cycles of CAF. Breast cancer outcomes included recurrence as well as disease-free and overall survival. Toxicity was evaluated by the Common Toxicity Criteria (CTC). Treatment-related quality of life was assessed by the Breast Chemotherapy Questionnaire (BCQ) before, during, and 4 months after treatment in 163 patients. The trial was designed to use one-sided tests of significance for power calculations, but is now reported with both one-sided and the traditional two-sided tests of significance. RESULTS: At a median follow-up of 3.9 years, the estimated 4-year recurrence-free survival rate was 67.5% with the 16-week regimen versus 62.7% with CAF (P = .19, two-sided; P = .095, one-sided). The estimated 4-year survival rate was 78.1% with the 16-week regimen versus 71.4% with CAF (P = .10, two-sided; P = .05, one-sided). CAF produced significantly higher grades of leukopenia, granulocytopenia, and thrombocytopenia, as well as liver and cardiac toxicity, whereas the 16-week regimen produced significantly higher grades of anemia, nausea, stomatitis, and weight loss, as well as skin and neurotoxicity. There were three treatment-related deaths with CAF but none with the 16-week regimen. During treatment, quality of life declined significantly more with the 16-week regimen than CAF, but by 4 months posttreatment, there was no difference. CONCLUSION: The 16-week regimen produced marginally better breast cancer outcomes than CAF with similar toxicity but a greater reduction in during-treatment quality of life. The 16-week regimen should not be used instead of a standard-dose regimen without careful consideration of the 16-week regimen's pros and cons, which include its complicated schedule. It should probably not be tested further, but its antimetabolite schedules and frequent drug administration (ie, dose density) should be considered in the development of new regimens.

Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group randomized trials of observation versus maintenance therapy for patients with metastatic breast cancer in complete remission following induction treatment.

PURPOSE: To investigate the value of maintenance treatment for patients with metastatic breast cancer whose disease is in complete remission (CR). PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred ninety-five women (141 eligible) whose disease was in CR or in CR except for bone metastases following six cycles (6 months) of doxorubicin-containing induction treatment were randomized to receive cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, fluorouracil, prednisone, tamoxifen, and halotestin [CMF(P)TH] or observation. In a previous pilot study, patients in CR after 24 months of induction treatment were randomized to continue chemotherapy for 4 more years or stop chemotherapy. RESULTS: Among patients randomized to CMF(P)TH, life-threatening toxicity included leukopenia in 3%, thrombocytopenia in 3%, cardiac in 2%, and diabetes in 1%. The median time to relapse from randomization was 18.7 months on CMF(P)TH and only 7.8 months on observation (P < .0001). The median time to death was 32.2 months on CMF(P)TH and 28.7 months on observation (P=.74). Similar results were seen in the pilot study (median time to relapse, 12.6 and 6.4 months; median survival, 37.7 and 24.2 months; study too small for statistical significance). Maintenance treatment was always the most significant covariate in time-to-relapse models. CONCLUSION: There is definite toxicity associated with CMF(P)TH maintenance treatment. When CR was obtained on induction, maintenance treatment with CMF(P)TH was never significant in survival models. However, maintenance treatment was always the most significant covariate in the time-to-relapse models, which motivates its consideration for appropriately informed patients.

Adjuvant CMFVP versus adjuvant CMFVP plus ovariectomy for premenopausal, node-positive, and estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer patients: a Southwest Oncology Group study.

PURPOSE: To determine whether the addition of surgical ovariectomy to standard chemotherapy prolongs disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival in premenopausal patients with estrogen receptor (ER)-positive operable breast cancer with positive axillary nodes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Three hundred fourteen premenopausal patients with ER-positive, node-positive breast cancer were enrolled between July 1979 and July 1989. Patients were stratified according to number of involved nodes and type of primary surgery and randomized to receive either of the following: (1) cyclophosphamide 60 mg/m2/d by mouth for 1 year, methotrexate 15 mg/m2 intravenously (i.v.) weekly for 1 year, fluorouracil (5-FU) 400 mg/m2 i.v. weekly for 1 year, vincristine .625 mg/m2 i.v. weekly for the first 10 weeks, and prednisone weeks 1 to 10 with doses decreasing from 30 mg/m2 to 2.5 mg/m2 (CMFVP); or (2) bilateral ovariectomy followed by CMFVP. RESULTS: The median follow-up time is 7.7 years and the maximum 13.2 years. Treatment arms are not significantly different with respect to either survival or DFS (one-sided log-rank, P = .55 and .70, respectively). The 7-year survival rate is 71% on the CMFVP arm and 73% on CMFVP plus ovariectomy. No significant differences were observed in node or receptor level subsets. CONCLUSION: We conclude that, in this study, the addition of ovariectomy did not improve results over chemotherapy alone in the treatment of premenopausal women with node-positive, ER-positive, operable breast cancer. Our sample size was too small to detect a small improvement. The death hazards ratio of CMFVP/CMFVP plus ovariectomy was 1.22 (95% confidence interval [CI], .79 to 1.89).

Short-course FAC-M versus 1 year of CMFVP in node-positive, hormone receptor-negative breast cancer: an intergroup study.

PURPOSE: To compare 1 year of therapy with continuous cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, fluorouracil (5-FU), vincristine, and prednisone (CMFVP) with a short course of treatment with a doxorubicin-based regimen in the postsurgical adjuvant treatment of patients with hormone receptor-negative, node-positive breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Five-hundred thirty-one eligible women with hormone receptor-negative, node-positive breast cancer were randomized to receive either 1 year of therapy with CMFVP or 20 weeks of therapy with four 5-week courses of treatment with 5-FU, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, and methotrexate (FAC-M). RESULTS: At a median follow-up time of 4.9 years, the two treatment arms cannot be demonstrated to be different with respect to overall survival (stratified log-rank, P = .27). The 5-year survival rate is 64% on the CMFVP arm and 61% on the FAC-M arm. CMFVP produces marginally superior disease-free survival (P = .06). The estimated 5-year disease-free survival rate is 55% for patients treated with CMFVP as opposed to 50% for patients treated with FAC-M. CONCLUSION: Neither regimen was shown to be superior in terms of overall survival. Because the disease-free survival produced by CMFVP is marginally superior to that produced by FAC-M, we do not recommend FAC-M for further investigation or for routine use. Possible implications of this study are discussed in the context of other adjuvant chemotherapy trials.

Vinorelbine (Navelbine) in the treatment of breast cancer: a summary.

One of the new agents intensively studied in the last decade for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer is vinorelbine (Navelbine; Burroughs Wellcome Co, Research Triangle Park, NC; Pierre Fabre Médicament, Paris, France). This vinca alkaloid produces response rates comparable to other single agents in women with metastatic breast cancer and is associated with a nonhematologic toxicity profile that makes it particularly advantageous for palliative treatment. In vitro studies provide evidence of the decreased neurotoxicity of vinorelbine compared with other vinca alkaloids and clinical studies document the drug's favorable toxicity profile. Granulocytopenia, the dose-limiting toxicity of this agent, is transient and, at current recommended dose levels, seldom results in life-threatening consequences. Results of a randomized clinical trial of intravenous vinorelbine show a similar or slightly improved effect on patient quality of life compared with intravenous melphalan (Alkeran; Burroughs Wellcome Co). Response rates in phase II trials of single-agent vinorelbine in women with previously untreated metastatic breast cancer range from approximately 30% to 60%. A number of studies are under way on the use of vinorelbine in combination with other agents commonly administered for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer. The low toxicity of vinorelbine makes it an attractive addition to several current combination regimens. Studies of increased dose intensity regimens of vinorelbine also are being actively pursued. Efforts to optimize the use of vinorelbine will hopefully lead to improved therapeutic options for the management of metastatic breast cancer.

Adjuvant CMFVP versus tamoxifen versus concurrent CMFVP and tamoxifen for postmenopausal, node-positive, and estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer patients: a Southwest Oncology Group study.

PURPOSE: To compare chemohormonal therapy, chemotherapy alone, and hormonal therapy alone in postmenopausal patients with estrogen receptor (ER)-positive operable breast cancer and positive axillary nodes with respect to survival and disease-free survival (DFS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eight hundred ninety-two postmenopausal women with ER-positive, node-positive breast cancer were enrolled by the Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG) from July 1979 to March 1989 and 74 by the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) between June 1987 and March 1989. Patients were stratified according to number of involved nodes and type of primary surgery and randomized to receive the following: (1) tamoxifen 10 mg twice daily by mouth for 1 year; (2) cyclophosphamide 60 mg/m2/d by mouth for 1 year, methotrexate 15 mg/m2 intravenously (IV) weekly for 1 year, fluorouracil (5-FU) 400 mg/m2 IV weekly for 1 year, vincristine .625 mg/m2 IV weekly for the first 10 weeks, and prednisone during weeks 1 to 10 with doses decreasing from 30 mg/m2 to 2.5 mg/m2 (CMFVP); or (3) the combination of tamoxifen and CMFVP. RESULTS: The median follow-up duration is 6.5 years, with a maximum of 12.8 years. Treatment arms are not significantly different with respect to either survival or DFS (log-rank, 2 df, P = .82 and .23, respectively). The 5-year survival rate is 77% for the tamoxifen arm, 78% for CMFVP, and 75% for the combination. No significant differences were observed in node or receptor level subsets. Severe or worse toxicity was experienced by 56% of patients on CMFVP and 61% on CMFVP plus tamoxifen, compared with 5% on tamoxifen alone. CONCLUSION: CMFVP chemotherapy, either alone or in combination with tamoxifen, has not been shown to be superior to tamoxifen alone in the treatment of postmenopausal women with node-positive, ER-positive, operable breast cancer.

Adjuvant therapy of breast cancer.

About 180,000 American women will be diagnosed with early stage breast cancer during 1993. In many of these patients breast cancer is a systemic disease at diagnosis and thus not curable by local treatment alone. The development of optimal forms of systemic adjuvant therapy has been a major area of research for more than 30 years. The two most widely employed types of adjuvant therapy, cytotoxic chemotherapy and tamoxifen, have been shown to improve relapse-free and overall survival in certain patient subsets. This review highlights recent advances in adjuvant therapy of early stage breast cancer and discusses current treatment guidelines.

Failure of GM-CSF to permit dose-escalation in an every other week dose-intensive regimen for advanced breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: In an attempt to improve dose intensity and therapeutic effectiveness in breast cancer, GM-CSF was incorporated into a multi-drug every other week chemotherapy regimen that had been previously reported to have promising activity, but whose dose-limiting toxicity was neutropenia. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A Phase I-II study in patients with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer was initiated using GM-CSF and a 5-drug chemotherapy regimen employing oral cyclophosphamide daily for 7 days and doxorubicin, vincristine, methotrexate, 5-fluorouracil, and leucovorin IV every 2 weeks for 10 courses. In the first 8 patients, GM-CSF in escalating doses (1-20 micrograms/kg s.c. per day) was given on days 8-13 of each 2 week cycle. In the last 12 patients, GM-CSF was given on days 3-14 of each cycle in an attempt to improve its effectiveness by prolonging treatment duration. RESULTS: The regimen was poorly tolerated. Only 10 patients completed all 10 courses of treatment, and most of those required dose delays and/or reductions. GM-CSF failed to reduce neutropenia when given by either schedule. Furthermore, thrombocytopenia was severe and progressive, especially with the more prolonged GM-CSF schedule in which the mean lowest nadir platelet count was 15,000/microliters. Anemia, fatigue, mucositis, and neutropenic fevers were also common, and dose escalations were not possible in any patient. Central venous catheter complications were also common. Complete or partial remissions were observed in 15 of 20 patients, but response durations were brief. CONCLUSIONS: GM-CSF in two different schedules failed to ameliorate myelosuppression when used in combination with this multiple drug, every other week regimen. Neutropenia and, especially, thrombocytopenia remained dose limiting.

Sixteen week dose intense chemotherapy for inoperable, locally advanced breast cancer.

Up to 15% of women with breast cancer have locally advanced disease at diagnosis. The poor response of these patients to local therapy alone and the frequent development of disseminated disease suggest that early intensive systemic therapy may benefit these women. Twenty-four patients with non-metastatic, locally advanced, primarily inflammatory, inoperable breast cancer were treated with a 16-week dose-intense chemotherapy regimen as induction therapy. Treatment consisted of 8 repetitive 2-week cycles consisting of 100 mg/m2 cyclophosphamide orally D1-7, 40 mg/m2 doxorubicin intravenously (IV) D1, 1 mg vincristine IV D1, 100 mg/m2 methotrexate IV D1, 10 mg/m2 leucovorin every 6 hours for six oral doses D2-3, and 600 mg/m2 5-FU IV over 2 hours D2. A continuous infusion of 300 mg/m2 5-FU per day was given IV D8-9 of each 2-week cycle. After induction all patients had at least a partial clinical response and were operable; 9/24 (37%) achieved a clinical complete response. All patients underwent at least a simple mastectomy. Pathologic examination revealed no evidence of gross macroscopic tumor in 11/24 patients (46%) and no evidence of microscopic disease in 4/24 patients (17%). Seven of 24 patients (29%) had no microscopic disease in the breast. At a median follow-up of 45 months, there have been 10 relapses in the 24 patients treated with this induction regimen. The actuarial relapse-free survival at 5 years is 58%. Actuarial overall survival at 5 years is 75%. We conclude that this regimen is safe and well-tolerated and that the results of this therapy are sufficiently promising to warrant further study of this regimen in patients with locally advanced breast cancer.

Phase II study of goserelin for patients with postmenopausal metastatic breast cancer.

PURPOSE: To determine the response rate of postmenopausal breast cancer patients to the gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GN-RH) agonist, Zoladex (goserelin; ICI Pharma, Wilmington, DE). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A multi-institutional single-agent trial in postmenopausal patients was conducted. Serum levels of follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), testosterone, and estradiol were requested before and after Zoladex treatment. RESULTS: For estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) patients, the response rate was 11%, with one complete response (CR) and three partial responses (PRs) among 36 eligible patients. Responses were of short duration. There were no responses among 16 estrogen receptor-negative (ER-) patients. CONCLUSION: GN-RH agonists have activity in ER+ postmenopausal patients, but response rates are not as high as with other available endocrine therapies and the duration of response is short.

Management of locally recurrent breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Locoregional recurrences occur commonly in women with breast cancer and often have grave prognostic implications. Major controversies exist concerning the prophylaxis, implications, and treatment of such relapses and are the focus of this review. METHODS: The relevant medical literature was reviewed and analyzed. RESULTS: Locoregional recurrences may be prevented by postoperative radiation therapy; however, this has little impact on survival. Postoperative systemic therapy prevents locoregional relapse, but less efficiently than radiation therapy. When these modalities are combined, radiation therapy often is delayed until after several cycles of chemotherapy. Optimal sequencing remains controversial. Most patients with locoregional relapses have an exceedingly poor outlook. Radiation therapy provides excellent local control; however, the addition of combination chemotherapy should be considered for patients with defined poor prognostic features. The clinical impact of recurrence in the breast after breast-conserving primary treatment now is emerging. Such local relapses do not have the dreaded prognostic implications of locoregional relapse after mastectomy, but are a marker for an increased risk of dissemination. Standard therapy in this setting remains mastectomy. Additional breast-conserving surgery may be considered in the context of clinical trials for patients with certain favorable features. Conversely, some local relapses after breast-conserving surgery have a poorer prognosis, and the addition of adjuvant systemic therapy should be considered in addition to mastectomy. CONCLUSIONS: The heterogenous nature of locoregional relapses has made it difficult to conduct prospective randomized clinical trials. However, many retrospective data exist, making it possible to recommend rational treatment approaches for these patients.