RESUMO
Primary CNS lymphoma (PCNSL) is a rare subtype of non-Hodgkin lymphoma with the worst outcomes amongst all extranodal lymphomas. There is a scarcity of data on real-world outcomes of primary CNS lymphoma (PCNSL) owing to the rarity of the disease. This study analyzed the demographic patterns, risk stratification, treatment regimens used, & outcomes of patients treated at Tata Memorial Center Mumbai, India. This is a retrospective analysis of newly diagnosed primary CNS lymphoma patients treated at our centre over seven years from January 2013 to December 2019. A total of 142 patients with PCNSL were diagnosed during this period. Thirty (21.1%) patients were deemed ineligible for any systemic or local therapies,ten patients were referred to other hospitals, two patients had relapsed disease, and one was excluded because age less than 18 years. Finally 99 patients were included in the final analysis. Among these 99 patients,72 patients (72.7%) were < 60 years,70 (70.7%) patients had Eastern cooperative oncology group (ECOG) performance status (PS) less than equal to 2. DLBCL was the most common histology (86.4%) while rests were high grade B cell NHL NOS (11.4%),Burkitt's Lymphoma(1%),Peripheral T-cell Lymphoma NOS (1.2%). Only one of 99 patients was positive for HIV serology. Multiple intracranial lesions were found in 59.5%. Surgical resection was performed in 28.4% of patients. Out of 63 patients in whom the International extranodal lymphoma study group (IELSG) score is available, 34(54%) were IELSG high-risk groups. As per Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) risk grouping, patients were almost equally distributed in all the risk groups, with 32(32.3%) patients in risk group 1 (age < 50 years), 36(36.4%) patients in risk group 2 (age > 50 years, KPS > = 70), and 31(31.3%) patients in risk group 3 age > 50 years, KPS < 70). First-line treatment with high dose methotrexate (HD-MTX) based regimens was administered to 92 (92.9%) patients, and 72.8% of these patients received rituximab. Of these 92 patients, 59 (64.1%) patients could complete induction, and 52 patients received consolidation. Thirty-one patients received high dose cytarabine based chemo consolidation, one patient underwent high dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ACST), and 19 patients received whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) and 1 patient received temozolomide as consolidation regimen. Thus only 52 patients completed the entire course of induction with consolidation therapy. The response to treatment was assessed using International PCNSL Collaborative Group Criteria. Post completion of consolidation, 49(94.2%) patients had a complete response. With a median follow-up duration of 39.2 months, the median progression-free survival (PFS) and the median overall survival (OS) of the patients taken into the analysis (N = 99) were 21 and 37 months respectively. On multivariate analysis, age < 60 yrs, > = 5 HD-MTX cycles received & the use of rituximab predicted better OS.Outcomes of patients with PCNSL treated with HD-MTX based therapy are comparable to reported literature however a large proportion of patients do not undergo required treatment despite the curable nature of disease. Supplementary Information: The online version supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12288-022-01557-7.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this research was to compare Heaviness of Smoking Index (HSI), high early smoking, and heavy smoking with the Fagerstrom Test for Nicotine Dependence (FTND) and further to evaluate the sensitivity of HSI, high early smoking, and heavy smoking among existing smokers. METHODS: A cross sectional study was conducted by using FTND questionnaire among 200 existing smokers. The cut-off point for HSI was kept at 4; high early smokers and heavy smokers were classified as those individuals who smoked within 30 minutes after waking up and individuals who smoked 30 cigarettes or more daily, respectively. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analysis and Cohen's Kappa statistics were evaluated. FINDINGS: A significant agreement was observed between the HSI and the FTND, having Kappa value of 0.70, with good sensitivity of 78.16% and specificity as high as 91.15%. The ROC analysis confirmed that a cut-off score of 4 for HSI was suitable. Agreement between FTND and high early smoking was observed to be moderate (Kappa = 0.47, P < 0.001), while very low agreement (Kappa = 0.19, P < 0.001) was observed for FTND and heavy smoking. CONCLUSION: Results show that HSI is an effective tool which can be substituted for the conventional FTND by the clinicians, psychotherapists, and investigators in health research.
RESUMO
The recent outbreak of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) coronavirus (CoV)-2 (SARS-CoV-2) causing coronavirus disease (covid19) has posed a great threat to human health. Previous outbreaks of SARS-CoV and Middle East respiratory Syndrome CoV (MERS-CoV) from the same CoV family had posed similar threat to human health and economic growth. To date, not even a single drug specific to any of these CoVs has been developed nor any anti-viral vaccine is available for the treatment of diseases caused by CoVs. Subunits present in spike glycoproteins of SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2 are involved in binding to human ACE2 Receptor which is the primary method of viral invasion. As it has been observed in the previous studies that there are very minor differences in the spike glycoproteins of SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2. SARS-CoV-2 has an additional furin cleavage site that makes it different from SARS-CoV (Walls et al., 2020). In this study, we have analyzed spike glycoproteins of SARS-CoV-2 and SARS-CoV phylogenetically and subjected them to selection pressure analysis. Selection pressure analysis has revealed some important sites in SARS-CoV-2 and SARS-CoV spike glycoproteins that might be involved in their pathogenicity. Further, we have developed a potential multi-epitope vaccine candidate against SARS-CoV-2 by analyzing its interactions with HLA-B*15:03 subtype. This vaccine consists of multiple T-helper (TH) cells, B-cells, and Cytotoxic T-cells (CTL) epitopes joined by linkers and an adjuvant to increase its immunogenicity. Conservation of selected epitopes in SARS, MERS, and human hosts, suggests that the designed vaccine could provide cross-protection. The vaccine is designed in silico by following a reverse vaccinology method acknowledging its antigenicity, immunogenicity, toxicity, and allergenicity. The vaccine candidate that we have designed as a result of this work shows promising result indicating its potential capability of simulating an immune response.
RESUMO
BackgroundPatients with cardiovascular disease are at increased risk of critical illness and mortality from Covid-19 disease. Conflicting findings have raised concerns regarding the association of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) use with likelihood or severity of infection during this pandemic. ObjectiveTo study the cumulative evidence for association of ACEI/ARB use with outcomes among patients with confirmed Covid-19. MethodsThe MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were thoroughly searched from November 01, 2019 to May 15, 2020 for studies reporting on outcomes based on ACEI/ARB use in patients with confirmed Covid-19. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis guidelines were used for the present study. Relevant data was collected and pooled odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using random-effects model. Main Outcome measuresIn-hospital mortality was the primary end of interest. Second end-point was severe or critical illness defined as either need for intensive care unit, invasive mechanical ventilation, or mortality. ResultsFifteen studies with total of 23,822 patients (N ACEI/ARB=6,650) were included in the present analysis. Overall, prevalence of ACEI/ARB use ranged from 7.7% to 46.2% across studies. Among 10 studies, patients using ACEI/ARB had similar odds of mortality [OR 1.03 (0.69-1.55)] and severe or critical illness [1.18 (0.91-1.54)] compared to those not on ACEI/ARB. In an analysis restricted to patients with hypertension, ACEI/ARB use was associated with significantly lower mortality [0.64 (0.45-0.89)], while the odds of severe/critical illness [0.76(0.52-1.12); p=0.16] remained non-significant compared with non-ACEI/ARB users. ConclusionThere is no evidence for increased risk of severe illness or mortality in patients using ACEI/ARB compared with non-users. In patients with hypertension, ACE/ARB use might be associated with reduced mortality, however these findings need to be confirmed in prospective randomized controlled trials.
