Evolution of body mass index and complications rate in severely or morbidly obese patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty.

INTRODUCTION: Associations between obesity and knee osteoarthritis or complications after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are well established. The procedure can significantly improve knee function, favoring weight loss, despite the risk of surgical complications. The main objective of the present study was to assess change in body mass index (BMI) after TKA in patients with severe or morbid obesity (BMI≥35kg/m2). The secondary endpoint was the rate of surgical revision. The hypotheses were that there is no significant change in BMI after TKA and that there is a significant rate of revision. METHODS: This retrospective descriptive study was conducted for the period June 2009 to December 2019. Thirty-three patients (48 knees) were included: 27 women, 6 men; mean age, 66.5 years (range, 55-80). Preoperatively, 11 patients had BMI 35-39.9kg/m2 and 22 BMI≥40 (including 11 with BMI≥45kg/m2). The preoperative axis was in varus for 35 patients (73%, including 54%≥10°) and in valgus for 13 (27% including 33%≥10°). Radiological and clinical evaluation was carried out at 3 months and 1 year postoperatively. At≥2 years, change in BMI and EQ5D functional score were established by telephone survey; >5% change in BMI was considered significant. RESULTS: Mean follow-up was 6.9±2.3 years (range, 2.9-10.5). Twenty-five patients (38 knees) were included for analysis. Mean postoperative BMI was 41±5kg/m2, with a mean decrease of 1.2±3.6kg/m2. At the last follow-up, BMI had increased in 8 patients (32%), including 3 by >5% (12%), and decreased in 16 (64%), including 7 by >5% (28%). The higher the baseline BMI, the greater the decrease: for BMI [35-39.9], -0.81 (range, -6.8; +4.3); for BMI [40-44.5],-1 (range, -9; +5.22); and for BMI>45, -1.54 (range, -3.97; +1.3). EQ5D averaged 0.75 at last follow-up. The higher the preoperative BMI, the more satisfactory the postoperative EQ5D: EQ5D for BMI [35-39.9]=0.71 (range, 0.36; 1); for BMI [40-44.5]=0.75 (range, 0.45; 1); and for BMI>45=0.80 (range, 0.48; 1). Four early surgical site infections (10.5%) and 2 isolated changes of the tibial component for early loosening (5.2%) required surgical revision. CONCLUSION: Patients with severe or morbid obesity had a low tendency to lose weight after TKA, but this does not appear to us to be clinically relevant: the functional results were good. Nevertheless, this series showed a significant rate of revision (15%). TKA was feasible in patients with BMI≥35kg/m2, but requires appropriate patient information. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Litigation in arthroscopic surgery: a 20-year analysis of legal actions in France.

PURPOSE: The main objective of this study was to identify the epidemiological characteristics of litigation following arthroscopic procedures, performed in private practice and public hospitals in France. The secondary objective was to establish a risk profile for medical malpractice lawsuits after arthroscopic surgery. METHODS: All court decisions related to arthroscopic surgery between 1994 and 2020 were collected and reviewed cases from the two main French legal databases (Legifrance and Doctrine). Data were retrospectively collected and included: gender, joint and defendant's specialty involved, reason behind the lawsuit, initial indication and the type of arthroscopic procedure performed. The final verdicts as well as the indemnity awarded to the plaintiff (if any) were recorded. RESULTS: One-hundred eighty cases met the inclusion criteria of the study and were analyzed: 58 cases were before administrative courts and 122 were before civil courts. An orthopaedic surgeon was involved alone or in solidum in 45.6% of cases (82/180), followed by anesthesiologists in 5.6% (10/180). The private surgery center or public hospital were implicated in 63.9% (115/180) of cases. The 2 most common joints involved in litigation following arthroscopic surgery were the knee (82.2%, n = 148) and the shoulder (11.1%, n = 20). The main reasons behind the lawsuit were related to postoperative infection in 78/180 cases and to a musculoskeletal complication in 45/180 cases (25%). A failure to inform was also reported in 34/180 cases (18.9%). Of the 180 cases, 122 cases (67.8%) resulted in a verdict for the plaintiff. The average indemnity award for the plaintiff was 77.984 euros [2.282-1.117.667]. A verdict for the plaintiff was significantly associated with postoperative infection or a wrong-side surgery, while technical error and musculoskeletal complications were more significantly likely to result in a verdict in favor of the defendant (p = 0.003). CONCLUSION: This study evaluated and mapped lawsuits following after arthroscopic surgery in France over a period of more than 20 years. The main joint involved in lawsuits was knee. The main causes of lawsuits following arthroscopic surgery were related to postoperative infection, musculoskeletal complications and failure to inform. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.