Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 22
Filtrar
1.
Ann Med ; 53(1): 2268-2277, 2021 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34854770

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Lactate/albumin (L/A) ratio is a biomarker in sepsis that has been shown to outperform lactate. This prospective study aims to validate the superior prognostic value of the L/A ratio to lactate in sepsis and septic shock. METHODS: Prospective cohort conducted from September 2018 till February 2021 on adult patients presenting to the Emergency Department (ED) at a tertiary care centre with sepsis or septic shock. The primary outcome was the prognostic value of the L/A ratio compared to lactate with regards to mortality. RESULTS: A total of 939 septic patients were included throughout the study period. A total of 236 patients developed septic shock. The AUC value of the L/A ratio in septic patients was 0.65 (95% CI 0.61-0.70) and was higher than that of lactate alone 0.60 (95% CI 0.55-0.64) with a p < .0001. The optimal L/A ratio cut-off threshold that separated survivors from non-survivors was found to be 0.115 for all septic patients. The AUC of the L/A ratio was significantly higher for patients with a lactate ≥2 mmol/L: 0.69 (95% CI 0.64-0.74) versus 0.60 (95% CI 0.54-0.66) with a p < .0001 as well as for patients with an albumin level less than 30 g/L (AUC = 0.69 95% CI= 0.62-0.75 vs AUC= 0.66 95% CI= 0.59-0.73, p = .04). Among septic shock patients there was no statically significant difference in the AUC value of the L/A ratio compared to lactate (0.53 95% CI 0.45-0.61 vs 0.50 95% CI 0.43-0.58 respectively with a p-value = .11). CONCLUSIONS: The L/A ratio is a better predictor of in-patient mortality than lactate in sepsis patients. This superiority was not found in the septic shock subgroup. Our results encourage the use of the ratio early in the ED as a superior prognostic tool in sepsis patients.Key messagesWe aimed to assess the prognostic usefulness of the Lactate/Albumin ratio compared to lactate alone in septic and septic shock patients.The L/A ratio proved to be a better predictor of in-patient mortality than lactate alone in sepsis patients. This pattern also applies across various subgroups in our study (malignancy, diabetics, age above 65, lactate level less than 2 mmol/L, albumin less than 30 g/L). Our results favour the use of the L/A ratio over lactate alone in patients with sepsis and the previously mentioned subgroups.Our results do not favour the use of the ratio instead of lactate in septic shock patients as there was no statistically significant difference between the AUCs of the ratio and lactate alone.


Assuntos
Sepse , Choque Séptico , Adulto , Albuminas , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Humanos , Ácido Láctico , Prognóstico , Estudos Prospectivos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Sepse/diagnóstico , Choque Séptico/diagnóstico
2.
Ann Med ; 53(1): 1737-1743, 2021 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34632897

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: This study aims to examine the outcome of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients admitted with sepsis to the intensive care unit (ICU). DESIGN: Single centre, retrospective cohort study. SETTING: The study was conducted in the Intensive Care Department of King Abdulaziz Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. PARTICIPANTS: Data were extracted from a prospectively collected ICU database from 2002 to 2017. Patients were considered to have sepsis based on the sepsis-3 definition and were stratified into 2 groups based on the presence or absence of ESRD. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOMES: The primary outcome of the study was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included ICU mortality, ICU and hospital lengths of stay, and mechanical ventilation duration. RESULTS: A total of 8803 patients were admitted to the ICU with sepsis during the study period. 730 (8.3%) patients had ESRD. 49.04% of ESRD patients with sepsis died within their hospital stay vs. 31.78% of non-ESRD patients. ESRD septic patients had 1.44 greater odds of dying within their hospital stay as compared to septic non-ESRD patients (OR 1.44, 95% CI 1.03-1.53). Finally, the predictors of hospital mortality in septic ESRD patients were found to be mechanical ventilation (OR 3.36; 95% CI 2.27-5.00), a history of chronic liver disease (OR 2.26; 95% CI 1.26-4.07), and use of vasopressors (OR 1.74; 95% CI 1.19-2.54). Among patients with ESRD, hospital mortality was higher in subgroups of patients with chronic cardiac (OR 1.86 (1.36-2.53) vs. 1.19 (0.96-1.47)) and chronic respiratory illnesses (OR 2.20 (1.52-3.20) vs. 1.21 (0.99-1.48)). CONCLUSION: ESRD patients admitted to the intensive care unit with sepsis are at greater odds of mortality compared to patients with non-ESRD. This risk is particularly increased if these patients have a concomitant history of chronic cardiac and respiratory illnesses.Key MessagesSepsis and bacterial infections are very common in ESRD patients and following cardiovascular disease; sepsis is the second leading cause of death in patients with ESRD.This study aims to examine the outcome of patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients admitted with sepsis to the intensive care unit (ICU).The results of this study have shown that end-stage renal disease is associated with greater odds of ICU and hospital mortality among septic patients admitted to an intensive care unit.ESRD patients were also more likely to be started on vasopressors and mechanical ventilation.


Assuntos
Mortalidade Hospitalar , Falência Renal Crônica/terapia , Sepse/complicações , Idoso , Cuidados Críticos , Feminino , Humanos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Falência Renal Crônica/mortalidade , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Diálise Renal , Estudos Retrospectivos , Arábia Saudita/epidemiologia , Sepse/mortalidade , Taxa de Sobrevida
3.
Ann Med ; 53(1): 1207-1215, 2021 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34282693

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) remains one of the most common causes of death. There is a scarcity of evidence concerning the prevalence of bacteraemia in cardiac arrest patients presenting to the Emergency Department (ED). We aimed to determine the prevalence of bacteraemia in OHCA patients presenting to the ED, as well as study the association between bacteraemia and in-hospital mortality in OHCA patients. In addition, the association between antibiotic use during resuscitation and in-hospital mortality was examined. METHODS AND RESULTS: This was a study of 200 adult OHCA patients who presented to the ED between 2015 and 2019. Bacteraemia was confirmed if at least one of the blood culture bottles grew a non-skin flora pathogen or if two blood culture bottles grew a skin flora pathogen from two different sites. The prevalence of bacteraemia was 46.5%. Gram positive bacteria, specifically Staphylococcus species, were the most common pathogens isolated from the bacteremic group. 42 patients survived to hospital admission. The multivariate analysis revealed that there was no association between bacteraemia and hospital mortality in OHCA patients (OR = 1.3, 95% CI= 0.2-9.2) with a p-value of .8. There was no association between antibiotic administration during resuscitation and hospital mortality (OR = 0.6, 95% CI= 0.1 - 3.8) with a p-value of .6. CONCLUSION: In our study, the prevalence of bacteraemia among OHCA patients presenting to the ED was found to be 46.5%. Bacteremic and non-bacteremic OHCA patients had similar initial baseline characteristics and laboratory parameters except for higher serum creatinine and BUN in the bacteremic group. In OHCA patients who survived their ED stay there was no association between hospital mortality and bacteraemia or antibiotic administration during resuscitation. There is a need for randomised controlled trials with a strong patient oriented primary outcome to better understand the association between in-hospital mortality and bacteraemia or antibiotic administration in OHCA patients.KEY MESSAGESWe aimed to determine the prevalence of bacteraemia in OHCA patients presenting to the Emergency Department. In our study, we found that 46.5% of patients presenting to our ED with OHCA were bacteremic.Bacteremic and non-bacteremic OHCA patients had similar initial baseline characteristics and laboratory parameters except for higher serum creatinine and BUN in the bacteremic group.We found no association between bacteraemia and hospital mortality. There was no association between antibiotic administration during resuscitation and hospital mortality.There is a need for randomised controlled trials with a strong patient oriented primary outcome to better understand the association between in-hospital mortality and bacteraemia or antibiotic administration in OHCA patients.


Assuntos
Bacteriemia/epidemiologia , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Parada Cardíaca Extra-Hospitalar/microbiologia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Reanimação Cardiopulmonar , Feminino , Bactérias Gram-Positivas/isolamento & purificação , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Positivas/diagnóstico , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Positivas/epidemiologia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Parada Cardíaca Extra-Hospitalar/epidemiologia , Prevalência , Estudos Retrospectivos , Staphylococcus/isolamento & purificação , Centros de Atenção Terciária
4.
Am J Emerg Med ; 49: 304-309, 2021 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34182275

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND IMPORTANCE: Inadequate initial antibiotic treatment of ESBL urinary tract infections (UTI) can lead to increase in the number of antibiotics used, return visits, longer hospitalizations, increased morbidity and mortality and increased costs. Given the important health implications on patients, this study aimed to examine the prevalence and predictors of ESBL UTIs among Emergency Department (ED) patients of a tertiary care center in Beirut, Lebanon. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Single-center retrospective observational study involving all adult UTI patients who presented to the ED of the American University of Beirut Medical Center, a tertiary care center between August 2019 and August 2020. RESULTS: Out of the 886 patients that were included, 24.9% had an ESBL organism identified by urine culture. They had higher bladder catheter use within the previous 90 days, antibiotic use within last 90 days, and were more likely to have a history of an ESBL producing isolate from any body site in the last year. Antibiotic use in the last 90 days and a history of ESBL producing isolate at any site in the previous year were significantly associated with developing an ESBL UTI (OR = 1.66, p = 0.001 and OR = 2.53, p < 0.001 respectively). Patients diagnosed with cystitis were less likely to have an ESBL organism (OR = 0.4 95%CI [0.20-0.81], p = 0.01) CONCLUSION: The prevalence of ESBL organisms was found to be 24.9% in urinary tract infections. The predictors of an ESBL UTI infection were antibiotic use in the last 90 days, a history of ESBL producing isolate at any site in the previous year. Based on the findings of our study, we can consider modifying initial empiric antibiotic treatment for patients presenting with a UTI with the above stated risk factors.


Assuntos
Infecções Urinárias/microbiologia , beta-Lactamases/metabolismo , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Distribuição de Qui-Quadrado , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/organização & administração , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Escherichia coli/efeitos dos fármacos , Escherichia coli/metabolismo , Escherichia coli/patogenicidade , Infecções por Escherichia coli/tratamento farmacológico , Feminino , Humanos , Líbano , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prevalência , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Infecções Urinárias/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções Urinárias/epidemiologia , beta-Lactamases/efeitos dos fármacos
5.
Shock ; 56(6): 910-915, 2021 12 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33651724

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The weekend effect is the increased mortality in hospitalized patients admitted on the weekend. The aim of this study was to examine the effect of weekend admissions on septic shock patients. METHODS: This is a retrospective observational study of the 2014 Nationwide Emergency Department Sample Database. Septic shock patients were included in this study using ICD-9-CM codes. Descriptive analysis was done, in addition to bivariate analysis to compare variables based on admission day. Multivariate analysis was conducted to examine the association between admission day and mortality in septic shock patients after adjusting for potential confounding factors. RESULTS: A total of 364,604 septic shock patients were included in this study. The average age was 67.19 years, and 51.1% were males. 73.0% of patients presented on weekdays. 32.3% of septic shock patients died during their hospital stay. After adjusting for confounders, there was no significant difference in the emergency department or in-hospital mortality of septic shock patients admitted on the weekend compared with those admitted during weekdays, (OR = 1.00 [95% CI: 0.97-1.03], P value = 0.985). CONCLUSION: There was no statistically significant difference in overall mortality between septic shock patients admitted on the weekend or weekday. Our results are contradictory to previous studies showing an increased mortality with the weekend effect. The previous observations that have been made may not stand up with current treatment protocols.


Assuntos
Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Choque Séptico/mortalidade , Idoso , Bases de Dados Factuais , Feminino , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Humanos , Masculino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Tempo
6.
BMJ Open ; 11(2): e038349, 2021 02 16.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33593761

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: This study aims to examine the outcome of haematological and patients with solid cancer presenting with sepsis to the emergency department (ED). DESIGN: Single-centred, retrospective cohort study. Setting conducted at an academic emergency department of a tertiary hospital. PARTICIPANTS: All patients >18 years of age admitted with sepsis were included. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were stratified into two groups: haematological and solid malignancy. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME: The primary outcome of the study was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included intensive care unit (ICU) mortality, ICU and hospital lengths of stay and mechanical ventilation duration. RESULTS: 442 sepsis cancer patients were included in the study, of which 305 patients (69%) had solid tumours and 137 patients (31%) had a haematological malignancy. The mean age at presentation was 67.92 (±13.32) and 55.37 (±20.85) (p<0.001) for solid and liquid tumours, respectively. Among patients with solid malignancies, lung cancer was the most common source (15.6%). As for the laboratory workup, septic solid cancer patients were found to have a higher white blood count (12 576.90 vs 9137.23; p=0.026). During their hospital stay, a total of 158 (51.8%) patients with a solid malignancy died compared with 57 (41.6%) patients with a haematological malignancy (p=0.047). There was no statistically significant association between cancer type and hospital mortality (OR 1.15 for liquid cancer p 0.58). There was also no statistically significant difference regarding intravenous fluid administration, vasopressor use, steroid use or intubation. CONCLUSION: Solid tumour patients with sepsis or septic shock are at the same risk of mortality as patients with haematological tumours. However, haematological malignancy patients admitted with sepsis or septic shock have higher rates of bacteraemia.


Assuntos
Neoplasias , Sepse , Choque Séptico , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Humanos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Tempo de Internação , Neoplasias/complicações , Estudos Retrospectivos , Sepse/complicações
7.
Front Med (Lausanne) ; 7: 561, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33072777

RESUMO

Objective: The clinical interpretation of lactate ≤ 2.00 mmol/L in emergency department (ED) patients is not well-characterized. This study aims to determine the optimal cutoff value for lactate within the reference range that predicts in-hospital mortality among ED patients. Methods: This was a retrospective study of adult patients presenting to a tertiary ED with an initial serum lactate level of <2.00 mmol/L. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Youden's index was utilized to determine the optimal threshold that predicts mortality. Patients above the threshold were labeled as having relative hyperlactatemia. Results: During the study period, 1,638 patients were included. The mean age was 66.9 ± 18.6 years, 47.1% of the population were female, and the most prevalent comorbidity was hypertension (56.7%). The mean lactate level at presentation was 1.5 ± 0.3 mmol/L. In-hospital mortality was 3.8% in the overall population, and 16.2% were admitted to the ICU. A lactate level of 1.33 mmol/L was found to be the optimal cutoff that best discriminates between survivors and non-survivors. Relative hyperlactatemia was an independent predictor of in-hospital mortality (OR 1.78 C1.18-4.03; p = 0.02). Finally, relative hyperlactatemia was associated with increased mortality in patients without hypertension (4.7 vs. 1.1%; p = 0.008), as well as patients without diabetes or COPD. Conclusion: The optimal cutoff of initial serum lactate that discriminates between survivors and non-survivors in the ED is 1.33 mmol/L. Relative hyperlactatemia is associated with increased mortality in emergency department patients, and this interaction seems to be more important in healthy patients.

8.
Front Med (Lausanne) ; 7: 550182, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33072780

RESUMO

Background: The aim of this study is to evaluate the prognostic value of the Lactate to Albumin (L/A) ratio compared to that of lactate only in predicting morbidity and mortality in sepsis patients. Methods: This was a single-center retrospective cohort study. All adult patients above the age of 18 with a diagnosis of sepsis who presented between January 1, 2014 and June 30, 2019 were included. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Results: A total of 1,381 patients were included, 44% were female. Overall in-hospital mortality was 58.4% with the mortalities of sepsis and septic shock being 45.8 and 67%, respectively. 55.5% of patients were admitted to the intensive care unit. The area under the curve value for lactate was 0.61 (95% CI 0.57-0.65, p < 0.001) and for the L/A ratio was 0.67 (95% CI 0.63-0.70, p < 0.001). The cutoff generated was 1.22 (sensitivity 59%, specificity 62%) for the L/A ratio in all septic patients and 1.47 (sensitivity 60%, specificity 67%) in patients with septic shock. The L/A ratio was a predictor of in-hospital mortality (OR 1.53, CI 1.32-1.78, p < 0.001). Conclusion: The L/A ratio has better prognostic performance than initial serum lactate for in-hospital mortality in adult septic patients.

9.
Oman Med J ; 34(4): 341-344, 2019 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31360324

RESUMO

We report a case of a patient presenting to the emergency department in cardiac arrest following a liposuction procedure, which was performed in a physician office using lidocaine anesthesia. During liposuction of the thighs, using the power-assisted technique, the patient was given a subcutaneous dose of lidocaine equal to 71 mg/kg without any noticeable intraoperative complication. Two hours later, the patient experienced dizziness, a rapid decline in mental status, tonic-clonic seizure, and cardiac arrest. The patient was successfully resuscitated in the emergency department with the return of spontaneous circulation after 22 minutes of continuous advanced cardiovascular life support resuscitation. The patient suffered from subsequent severe hypoxic-ischemic brain injury, and a complicated hospital stay, including brain edema, electrolytes disturbances, and nosocomial infections contributed to her death two months later due to septic shock.

10.
Emerg Med Int ; 2019: 8747282, 2019.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30863642

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: EGDT (Early Goal Directed Therapy) or some portion of EGDT has been shown to decrease mortality secondary to sepsis and septic shock. OBJECTIVE: Our study aims to assess the effect of adopting this approach in the emergency department on in-hospital mortality secondary to sepsis/septic shock in Lebanon. HYPOTHESIS: Implementation of the EGDT protocol of sepsis in ED will decrease in-hospital mortality. METHODS: Our retrospective study included 290 adult patients presenting to the ED of a tertiary center in Lebanon with severe sepsis and/or septic shock. 145 patients between years 2013 and 2014 who received protocol care were compared to 145 patients treated by standard care between 2010 and 2012. Data from the EHR were retrieved about patients' demographics, medical comorbidities, and periresuscitation parameters. A multivariate analysis using logistic regression for the outcome in-hospital mortality after adjusting for protocol use and other confounders was done and AOR was obtained for the protocol use. 28-day mortality, ED, and hospital length of stay were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: The most common infection site in the protocol arm was the lower respiratory tract (42.1%), and controls suffered more from UTIs (33.8%). Patients on protocol care had lower in-hospital mortality than that receiving usual care, 31.7% versus 47.6% (p=0.006) with an AOR of 0.429 (p =0.018). Protocol patients received more fluids at 6 and 24 hours (3.8 ± 1.7 L and 6.1 ± 2.1 L) compared to the control group (2.7 ± 2.0 L and 4.9 ± 2.8 L p=<0.001). Time to and duration of vasopressor use, choice of appropriate antibiotics, and length of ED stay were not significantly different between the two groups. CONCLUSION: EGDT- (Early Goal Directed Therapy-) based sepsis protocol implementation in EDs decreases in-hospital mortality in developing countries. Adopting this approach in facilities with limited resources, ICU capabilities, and prehospital systems may have a pronounced benefit.

11.
Am J Emerg Med ; 37(2): 378.e1-378.e6, 2019 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30503276

RESUMO

Acute mesenteric venous thrombosis (MVT) is an uncommon cause of intestinal ischemia and is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Patients with acute MVT often present with gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding and other unspecific findings making the diagnosis challenging. This condition requires emergent treatment. The high rates of misdiagnosis of these patients and subsequently the delay in proper and quick management put patients at increased risk of having a negative outcome. Physicians should suspect acute MVT in patients with GI bleed while also considering other factors such as, a past medical history of pro-thrombotic conditions, past surgical history of splenectomy, symptoms of nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, physical exam findings of abdominal tenderness and abdominal distention and a laboratory workup indicating leukocytosis and an increased plasma lactic acid level. An increase in the yield of accurate diagnosis of acute MVT is possible if physicians in the ED accurately interpret all these findings. The authors herein present a case of acute MVT in a patient whose initial complaint was GI bleeding and provide a thorough review of the literature of cases of acute MVT presenting with GI bleed.


Assuntos
Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/etiologia , Oclusão Vascular Mesentérica/diagnóstico , Veias Mesentéricas/diagnóstico por imagem , Trombose Venosa/diagnóstico , Adulto , Erros de Diagnóstico , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Oclusão Vascular Mesentérica/complicações , Oclusão Vascular Mesentérica/diagnóstico por imagem , Oclusão Vascular Mesentérica/cirurgia , Veias Mesentéricas/cirurgia , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Trombose Venosa/complicações , Trombose Venosa/diagnóstico por imagem , Trombose Venosa/cirurgia
12.
Crit Ultrasound J ; 10(1): 32, 2018 Dec 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30506432

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Fluid responsiveness is an important topic for clinicians. Aggressive hydration has been shown to lead to worse outcomes. The aim of this study was to investigate the sensitivity and specificity of mitral valve (MV) velocity time integral (VTI) as a non-invasive marker of volume responsiveness. METHODS: This was a prospective observational study conducted in a tertiary emergency department. End-stage renal disease patients presenting to the emergency department requiring emergent hemodialysis were enrolled. A focused echocardiogram was done on enrolled patients. Two sets of measurements were obtained before and after hemodialysis. During each scanning session, the left ventricular outflow tract and the mitral valve VTI were obtained before and after a passive leg raise maneuver. RESULTS: 54 patients were enrolled, of which, 30 (55%) were male. The mean age was 47.4 years. The mean volume of fluid removed was 3.89 ± 0.91 L. All patients had a diagnosis of hypertension, 22 (41%) patients were diabetic, 14 (26%) patients had coronary artery disease, and 19 (35%) patients had congestive heart failure. The mean change in LVOT VTI was 1.83% (95% CI 0.12-3.55) in the pre-dialysis group and 15.05% (95% CI 12.76-17.34) in the post-hemodialysis cohort. The mean change in MV VTI was 3.74% (95% CI 2.84-4.65) in the pre-dialysis cohort and 12.95% (95% CI 11.50-14.39) in the post-dialysis cohort. For patients who had < 4 L removed, the mean delta LVOT VTI post-hemodialysis was 12.64% (95% CI 9.79-15.49) and the mean delta MV VTI was 10.48% (95% CI 8.28-12.69). For patients who had > 4 L removed, the mean delta LVOT VTI was 16.84% (95% CI 13.47-20.22) and the mean MV VTI was 14.77% (95% CI 13.03-16.51). Mitral valve VTI with PLR was found to have a sensitivity of 89.18% and a specificity of 94.11% in detecting volume responsiveness. CONCLUSION: Mitral valve velocity time integral in conjunction with passive leg raise seem to correlate with volume responsiveness in hemodialysis patients.

13.
BMC Emerg Med ; 18(1): 38, 2018 11 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30384834

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Blunt abdominal trauma in the setting of polycystic kidney disease is still scantly described in the literature and management guidelines of such patients are not well-established. CASE PRESENTATION: The authors herein present a case of hypovolemic shock secondary to segmental renal artery bleed in a 75-year-old man with polycystic kidney disease after minimal blunt abdominal trauma, who underwent successful selective arterial embolization, and provide a thorough review of similar cases in the literature, while shedding the light on important considerations when dealing with such patients. CONCLUSIONS: It is important to suspect renal injury in patients with pre-existing renal lesions irrespective of the mechanism of injury; and, vice-versa to suspect an underlying abnormality in patients with a clinical deterioration that's out of proportion to the mechanism of injury.


Assuntos
Injúria Renal Aguda/fisiopatologia , Rim Policístico Autossômico Dominante/fisiopatologia , Ferimentos não Penetrantes , Traumatismos Abdominais/diagnóstico por imagem , Idoso , Humanos , Masculino , Rim Policístico Autossômico Dominante/diagnóstico por imagem , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/diagnóstico por imagem
14.
BMJ Open ; 8(7): e022185, 2018 08 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30068620

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Patients with congestive heart failure (CHF) may be at a higher risk of mortality from sepsis than patients without CHF due to insufficient cardiovascular reserves during systemic infections. The aim of this study is to compare sepsis-related mortality between CHF and no CHF in patients presenting to a tertiary medical centre. DESIGN: A single-centre, retrospective, cohort study. SETTING: Conducted in an academic emergency department (ED) between January 2010 and January 2015. Patients' charts were queried via the hospital's electronic system. Patients with a diagnosis of sepsis were included. Descriptive analysis was performed on the demographics, characteristics and outcomes of patients with sepsis of the study population. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 174 patients, of which 87 (50%) were patients with CHF. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOMES: The primary outcome of the study was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital lengths of stay, and differences in interventions between the two groups. RESULTS: Patients with CHF had a higher in-hospital mortality (57.5% vs 34.5%). Patients with sepsis and CHF had higher odds of death compared with the control population (OR 2.45; 95% CI 1.22 to 4.88). Secondary analyses showed that patients with CHF had lower instances of bacteraemia on presentation to the ED (31.8% vs 46.4%). They had less intravenous fluid requirements in first 24 hours (2.75±2.28 L vs 3.67±2.82 L, p =0.038), had a higher rate of intubation in the ED (24.2% vs 10.6%, p=0.025) and required more dobutamine in the first 24 hours (16.1% vs 1.1%, p<0.001). ED length of stay was found to be lower in patients with CHF (15.12±24.45 hours vs 18.17±26.13 hours, p=0.418) and they were more likely to be admitted to the ICU (59.8% vs 48.8%, p=0.149). CONCLUSION: Patients with sepsis and CHF experienced an increased hospital mortality compared with patients without CHF.


Assuntos
Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Insuficiência Cardíaca Sistólica/mortalidade , Insuficiência de Múltiplos Órgãos/mortalidade , Sepse/mortalidade , Centros de Atenção Terciária , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Insuficiência Cardíaca Sistólica/fisiopatologia , Insuficiência Cardíaca Sistólica/terapia , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Humanos , Líbano/epidemiologia , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Insuficiência de Múltiplos Órgãos/fisiopatologia , Insuficiência de Múltiplos Órgãos/terapia , Avaliação de Resultados da Assistência ao Paciente , Estudos Retrospectivos , Sepse/fisiopatologia , Sepse/terapia , Sinais Vitais
15.
Ann Gen Psychiatry ; 17: 21, 2018.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29849740

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Emergency Department (ED) visits for suicide attempts have been described worldwide; however, the populations studied were predominantly Western European, North American, or East Asian. This study aims to describe the epidemiology of ED patients presenting post-suicide attempt to an academic medical center in Lebanon and to report on factors that affect ED disposition. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted between 2009 and 2015. Patients of any age group were included if they had presented to the ED after a suicide attempt. Patients with unintentional self-harm were excluded. Descriptive analysis was performed on the demographics and characteristics of suicide attempts of the study population. A bivariate analysis to compare the two groups (hospitalized or discharged) was conducted using Student's t test and Pearson Chi-square where appropriate. A multivariate analysis was then conducted to determine the predictors of hospital admission. RESULTS: One hundred and eight patients were included in the final analysis. Most patients were females (71.4%) and between 22 and 49 years of age. A considerable number of patients were unemployed (43%), unmarried (61.1%), and living with family (86.9%). Most suicide attempts were performed at home (93.5%) and on a weekday (71.3%). The most common mechanisms of injury were overdose with prescription medications (61.3%), overdose with over-the-counter drugs (27.9%), and self-inflicted lacerations (10.1%). The classes of medication most commonly abused were benzodiazepines (39.3%) followed by acetaminophen (27.3%). A large portion of our patients were admitted (70.3%), with the majority going to the psychiatric ward (71.1%). Of note, a quarter (27.5%) of our patients left the ED against medical advice, with 23.5% of admitted patients leaving the hospital before completion of treatment. The main predictors of admission were found to be overdose on prescription medications OR 9.25 (2.12-40.42 CI95%). CONCLUSIONS: The characteristics of our suicide attempters mirror those of international and regional suicide attempters. Further work is required to quantify the effect of voluntary refusal of hospital treatment, the repercussions of family, and financial barriers to healthcare and suicide as a whole in our society.

16.
Am J Emerg Med ; 36(8): 1474-1479, 2018 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29730094

RESUMO

In the setting of cardiac arrest, refractory ventricular fibrillation (VF) is difficult to manage, and mortality rates are high. Double sequential defibrillation (DSD) has been described in the literature as a successful means to terminate this malignant rhythm, after failure of traditional Advanced Cardiac Life Support (ACLS) measures. The authors herein present a case of refractory VF in a patient with cardiac arrest, on whom DSD was successful in reversion to sinus rhythm, and provide a thorough review of similar cases in the literature.


Assuntos
Suporte Vital Cardíaco Avançado , Cardioversão Elétrica/métodos , Parada Cardíaca Extra-Hospitalar/terapia , Fibrilação Ventricular/terapia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Desfibriladores , Serviços Médicos de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Parada Cardíaca Extra-Hospitalar/mortalidade , Recidiva , Fibrilação Ventricular/mortalidade
17.
J Emerg Med ; 54(1): 47-53, 2018 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29110979

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The placement of a central venous catheter for the administration of vasopressors is still recommended and required by many institutions because of concern about complications associated with peripheral administration of vasopressors. OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to determine the incidence of complications from the administration of vasopressors through peripheral venous catheters (PVC) in patients with circulatory shock, and to identify the factors associated with these complications. METHODS: This was a prospective, observational study conducted in the emergency department (ED) of a tertiary care medical center. Patients presenting to the ED with circulatory shock and in whom a vasopressor was started through a PVC were included. Research fellows examined the i.v. access site for complications twice daily during the period of peripheral vasopressor administration, then daily up to 48 h after treatment discontinuation or until the patient expired. RESULTS: Of the 55 patients that were recruited, 3 (5.45% overall, 6% of patients receiving norepinephrine) developed complications; none were major. Two developed local extravasation and one developed local thrombophlebitis. All three complications occurred during the vasopressor infusion, none in the 48 h after discontinuation, and none required any medical or surgical intervention. Two of the three complications occurred in the hand, and all occurred in patients receiving norepinephrine and with 20-gauge catheters. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of complications from the administration of vasopressors through a PVC is small and did not result in significant morbidity in this study. Larger prospective studies are needed to better determine the factors that are associated with these complications, and identify patients in whom this practice is safe.


Assuntos
Cateterismo Periférico/efeitos adversos , Choque/tratamento farmacológico , Vasoconstritores/efeitos adversos , Administração Intravenosa/efeitos adversos , Administração Intravenosa/métodos , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Cateterismo Periférico/métodos , Efeitos Colaterais e Reações Adversas Relacionados a Medicamentos/epidemiologia , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/organização & administração , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Vasoconstritores/farmacologia , Vasoconstritores/uso terapêutico
18.
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med ; 25(1): 69, 2017 Jul 14.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28705203

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Elevated lactate has been found to be associated with a higher mortality in a diverse patient population. The aim of the study is to investigate if initial serum lactate level is independently associated with hospital mortality for critically ill patients presenting to the Emergency Department. METHODS: Single-center, retrospective study at a tertiary care hospital looking at patients who presented to the Emergency Department (ED) between 2014 and 2016. A total of 450 patients were included in the study. Patients were stratified to lactate levels: <2 mmol/L, 2-4 mmol/L and >4 mmol/L. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included 72-h hospital mortality, ED and hospital lengths of stay. RESULTS: The mean age was 64.87 ± 18.08 years in the <2 mmol/L group, 68.51 ± 18.01 years in the 2-4 mmol/L group, and 67.46 ± 17.67 years in the >4 mmol/L group. All 3 groups were comparable in terms of age, gender and comorbidities except for diabetes, with the 2-4 mmol/L and >4 mmol/L groups having a higher proportion of diabetic patients. The mean lactate level was 1.42 ± 0.38 (<2 mmol/L), 2.72 ± 0.55 (2-4 mmol/L) and 7.18 ± 3.42 (>4 mmol/L). In-hospital mortality was found to be 4 (2.7%), 18(12%) and 61(40.7%) patients in the low, intermediate and high lactate groups respectively. ED and hospital length of stay were longer for the >4 mmol/L group as compared to the other groups. While adjusting for all variables, patients with intermediate and high lactate had 7.13 (CI 95% 2.22-22.87 p = 0.001) and 29.48 (CI 95% 9.75-89.07 p = <0.001) greater odds of in-hospital mortality respectively. DISCUSSION: Our results showed that for all patients presenting to the ED, a rising lactate value is associated with a higher mortality. This pattern was similar regardless of patients' age, presence of infection or blood pressure at presentation. CONCLUSION: Higher lactate values are associated with higher hospital mortalities and longer ED and hospital lengths of stays. Initial ED lactate is a useful test to risk-stratify critically ill patients presenting to the ED.


Assuntos
Estado Terminal/mortalidade , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Ácido Láctico/sangue , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Comorbidade , Feminino , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos
19.
J Ultrasound Med ; 36(12): 2503-2510, 2017 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28660688

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this meta-analysis was to determine the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (US) for confirming the tip location and placement of central venous catheters in adult patients. METHODS: A systematic review was performed using electronic databases, including MEDLINE, ClinicalTrials.gov, Cochrane, Embase, PubMed, and Scopus. Inclusion criteria were studies conducted on adult patients receiving an internal jugular or a subclavian central venous catheter in the emergency department or intensive care unit. Furthermore, the catheter tip location had to be checked with the use of the agitated saline contrast-enhanced US technique. RESULTS: A total of 2245 articles were screened by title and abstract. Seventeen articles were retrieved and assessed for the predefined inclusion criteria. Four articles and 1 abstract were used in the final analysis. Contrast-enhanced US showed pooled sensitivity of 72% (95% confidence interval, 44%-91%), pooled specificity of 100% (95% confidence interval, 99%-100%), a positive predictive value of 92.1%, and a negative predictive value of 98.5% compared with chest radiography for confirming the placement of central venous catheters. CONCLUSIONS: In the setting of central venous catheter placement, postprocedural contrast-enhanced US imaging is a safe, efficient, and highly specific confirmatory test for the catheter tip location compared with chest radiography.


Assuntos
Cateterismo Venoso Central/instrumentação , Cateteres Venosos Centrais , Meios de Contraste , Aumento da Imagem/métodos , Ultrassonografia de Intervenção/métodos , Cateterismo Venoso Central/métodos , Humanos , Veias Jugulares/diagnóstico por imagem , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Veia Subclávia/diagnóstico por imagem
20.
BMJ Open ; 7(3): e013502, 2017 Mar 13.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28289047

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Most sepsis studies have looked at the general population. The aim of this study is to report on the characteristics, treatment and hospital mortality of patients with cancer diagnosed with sepsis or septic shock. SETTING: A single-centre retrospective study at a tertiary care centre looking at patients with cancer who presented to our tertiary hospital with sepsis, septic shock or bacteraemia between 2010 and 2015. PARTICIPANTS: 176 patients with cancer were compared with 176 cancer-free controls. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOMES: The primary outcome of this study was the in hospital mortality in both cohorts. Secondary outcomes included patient demographics, emergency department (ED) vital signs and parameters of resuscitation along with laboratory work. RESULTS: A total of 352 patients were analysed. The mean age at presentation for the cancer group was 65.39±15.04 years, whereas the mean age for the control group was 74.68±14.04 years (p<0.001). In the cancer cohort the respiratory system was the most common site of infection (37.5%) followed by the urinary system (26.7%), while in the cancer-free arm, the urinary system was the most common site of infection (40.9%). intravenous fluid replacement for the first 24 hours was higher in the cancer cohort. ED, intensive care unit and general practice unit length of stay were comparable in both the groups. 95 (54%) patients with cancer died compared with 75 (42.6%) in the cancer-free group. The 28-day hospital mortality in the cancer cohort was 87 (49.4%) vs 46 (26.1%) in the cancer-free cohort (p=0.009). Patients with cancer had a 2.320 (CI 95% 1.225 to 4.395, p=0.010) odds of dying compared with patients without cancer in the setting of sepsis. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study looking at an in-depth analysis of sepsis in the specific oncology population. Despite aggressive care, patients with cancer have higher hospital mortality than their cancer-free counterparts while adjusting for all other variables.


Assuntos
Bacteriemia/mortalidade , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Neoplasias/mortalidade , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Bacteriemia/etiologia , Cuidados Críticos , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Feminino , Hidratação , Humanos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Líbano/epidemiologia , Tempo de Internação , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias/complicações , Infecções Respiratórias/complicações , Estudos Retrospectivos , Sepse/complicações , Sepse/mortalidade , Centros de Atenção Terciária , Infecções Urinárias/complicações
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...