Hepatic encephalopathy. Metabolic consequence of cirrhosis often is reversible.

Hepatic encephalopathy is a well-recognized clinical complication of chronic liver disease. About 30% of patients with cirrhosis die in hepatic coma. Hepatic encephalopathy can occur in patients with fulminant liver disease without evidence of portal-systemic shunting. These patients have increased intracranial pressure and brain edema with a deleterious clinical course and poor prognosis unless liver transplantation is available. The pathogenesis of portal-systemic hepatic encephalopathy probably is multifactorial, although the predominant causative agent appears to be ammonia. The molecular basis of neurotoxicity of ammonia or other agents implicated in the condition is poorly understood. Therapy includes timely recognition and correction of precipitating factors. Once the condition is manifested, standard therapy is acute administration of lactulose, a disaccharide that is undigested in the small intestine. Its beneficial action is not fully understood. The use of oral antibiotics and BCAAs is of some benefit in patients who do not respond to lactulose. Limitation of protein in the diet may be useful for short periods but is not recommended for long-term use because of potential worsening of already poor nutrition. Several experimental therapies based on potential pathogenetic mechanisms have not resulted in improved outcomes over standard therapy with lactulose. However, future research will likely focus on the correction of alterations in neurotransmission. It is hoped that newer therapies will provide protection from the putative neurotoxins that cause secondary defects in neurotransmission.

Nutrition in acute pancreatitis.

The majority of patients (80%) admitted with acute pancreatitis recovers after a few days of bowel rest and intravenous fluids. However, some cases progress to a fulminant disease complicated by a severe systemic inflammatory response and multiple organ failure, a condition in which mortality is related to the degree of negative nitrogen balance. The goal of nutrition support in this situation is to cover the increased metabolic demands without stimulating pancreatic secretion and exacerbating the "autodigestion" that characterizes the condition. Although human and animal studies have shown conflicting results regarding the effect of composition and location of feeding on pancreatic enzyme secretion, there is consensus that total parenteral nutrition (TPN), given at moderate infusion rates, does not significantly stimulate secretion in humans and that enteral diets stimulate enzyme secretion unless delivered below the jejunum. Consequently, until recently TPN has been the standard of therapy. The fact that the cost and complications of TPN can often outweigh its benefits (catheter sepsis, hyperglycemia) has led to a series of recent controlled clinical trials of modified enteral diets in which the diet is delivered by nasojejunal tube. Results have demonstrated that enteral nutrition, with either elemental or polymeric formulas, was cheaper, safer, and at the same time more effective in reducing the systemic inflammatory response. The pathophysiologic explanation for these observations needs further investigation.