A novel cause of erythromelalgia due to pseudoephedrine.

Objective: Erythromelalgia is a rare, highly debilitating disorder characterised by severe episodes of discomfort, erythema, and desquamation of the extremities. Its causes include genetic factors, medications, and several underlying medical conditions. This paper describes a novel cause of erythromelalgia through a case report and literature review. Case description: A 47-year-old Caucasian man presented with a two-year history of intermittent pain, redness and desquamation of the hands. He experienced several such episodes, each lasting 3-4 weeks. A skin biopsy confirmed the diagnosis of erythromelalgia. After several recurrences, he admitted to the intermittent use of pseudoephedrine as a nasal decongestant, which coincided with the episodes of erythromelalgia. Complete resolution of symptoms was reported on cessation of this medication. Conclusion: Pseudoephedrine has been reported to cause a wide range of cutaneous reactions but has not been known to precipitate erythromelalgia. Recognition of this rare side effect may offer early diagnosis and reduced morbidity.

Effectiveness and diagnostic accuracy of teledermatology for the assessment of skin conditions.

BACKGROUND: Teledermatology provides a platform for swift specialist advice without the potential need for face-to-face review. Our objectives were to investigate the effectiveness, accuracy and diagnostic concordance of the platform with regard to the remote management of skin conditions. METHODS: We undertook a single-centre, retrospective chart review over a 1-year period, comprising a total of 1703 teledermatology referrals. Two physicians independently assessed the diagnostic concordance between telederm diagnosis (TD), in-person diagnosis (ID) and histopathological diagnosis (HD). RESULTS: There were a total of 1703 TD referrals, of which 341 were rejected, leaving 1362 referrals for evaluation. Sixty-five per cent of these referrals were managed remotely and discharged with advice, although 4.6% of these were later re-referred for an in-person review. A total of 20% of referrals were rejected, of which the majority was due to a lack of appropriate imaging. The total concordance of TD compared to ID was 76.4%. When comparing the TD and ID/HD, we obtained a Kappa value of 0.636 indicating substantial agreement. In terms of accuracy, there were 49 biopsy-proven skin cancers picked up by the service in this cohort of data. Of these, 61.2% were given an accurate diagnosis on first impression via teledermatology, 14.3% were given a different diagnosis but correctly categorised as skin cancer and 24.5% could not be assessed; however, they were triaged and escalated based upon clinical suspicion. CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrates that teledermatology is an effective platform in terms of diagnosis and remote management, with adequate diagnostic accuracy and concordance to in-person diagnosis.